![]() |
A better poly for 7,373-
amphoria's poly optimized by Msieve:
[code]Msieve v. 1.52 (SVN 958) R0: -5467829758828677610003436226504845866790 R1: 2243695212369497491 A0: 1584717944544652111361338636393249829320243024039611 A1: 6244530518381050463416318502892817550281131 A2: 629863195693947805948443718832449 A3: -20338404899747920998286739 A4: -138103230226652 A5: 84600 skew 3205605172.37, size 3.829e-020, alpha -8.224, combined = 2.192e-015[/code]and optimized by CADO-NFS: [code]R0: -5467829758828662556877248212981357943492 R1: 2243695212369497491 A0: 1626635195880018080222702174245256552779602603760905 A1: 6250235554810812252292008498864856719101331 A2: 220470318981252617710909918321915 A3: -20342073001200933131010163 A4: -135265290232652 A5: 84600 skew 3200000000.00, size 3.829e-020, alpha -8.224, combined = 2.192e-015[/code] |
Thanks! Here's the best I have for 3,703+. Any better?
[CODE]# norm 1.545586e-20 alpha -9.074452 e 1.105e-15 rroots 5 skew: 6828818355.54 c0: -3222407615029835973560010490181467735307547633105653229 c1: 53407489570586699321783320626147667384387545 c2: 508377025734147691722344152203042945 c3: 4963932753950165293475875 c4: -15264392838805076 c5: 87300 Y0: -36806438438806696151001861640305106430180 Y1: 95878183758594093197 [/CODE] |
Poly for 7,373-
The best poly for 7,373- so far.
I let the polyselection continue for a while. [CODE]# norm 5.395003e-20 alpha -8.281925 e 2.465e-15 rroots 5 skew: 231930837.82 c0: 1109859739973746143552135465506542624348772748288 c1: 310742081699113752332876673724263235353432 c2: -1893309250118169889097154654861724 c3: -35083030189716491948709517 c4: 33132454354803206 c5: 85765680 Y0: -1369702819513586759963938688412616604455 Y1: 4928095242679925421737 [/CODE]I'll also look for a better poly for 11,671M. |
Guys, please check here the current list of integers fed or to be fed to the grid.
[url]https://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/numbers.html[/url] Right now we are completing sieving of 6,460+, rest below until 2,1079+ is done for the moment. |
[QUOTE=Gimarel;444768]The best poly for 7,373- so far.
I let the polyselection continue for a while. [CODE]# norm 5.395003e-20 alpha -8.281925 e 2.465e-15 rroots 5 skew: 231930837.82 c0: 1109859739973746143552135465506542624348772748288 c1: 310742081699113752332876673724263235353432 c2: -1893309250118169889097154654861724 c3: -35083030189716491948709517 c4: 33132454354803206 c5: 85765680 Y0: -1369702819513586759963938688412616604455 Y1: 4928095242679925421737 [/CODE]I'll also look for a better poly for 11,671M.[/QUOTE] That is considerably better! It reduced the sieving limit from 900M to 560M, and has been submitted to the grid. I will be submitting 11,671M to the grid tomorrow and 3,703+ likely on Friday. |
Poly for 11,671M
I hope that it's not to late. Here's a better poly for 11,671M
[CODE]# norm 8.091519e-20 alpha -8.408878 e 3.155833e-15 rroots 3 skew: 107996745.83 c0: -384559388390185238052831821407480574899673604700 c1: 10748085832694954935447027998148092938830 c2: -1164025190784195463005285907975877 c3: -354531071225021313786850 c4: 205123799151128142 c5: 86486400 Y0: -526170659967914909260231849693059494667 Y1: 100970794921171919629 [/CODE] |
Polys for 3,703+
Two better polys for 3,703+.
Which one is better depends on the range that is planned to sieve. [CODE]# norm 1.788690e-20 alpha -9.107335 e 1.209056e-15 rroots 5 skew: 1040457091.81 c0: 1583660106005744401792960601946449485424231137783647 c1: 15953961199680499009778025002496801434399971 c2: -140172291645084630128051775699400961 c3: -165085700085592379731475499 c4: 128745925779910842 c5: 10810800 Y0: -14039611074004526205668931098288258056250 Y1: 1795190936105720178911 # norm 1.756253e-20 alpha -8.014349 e 1.202329e-15 rroots 5 skew: 390528386.88 c0: -95931493762884947193763908866486388707708521012621 c1: 902610674111945855170224516493427015147524 c2: 22588972639631322195766454630626432 c3: -58575064413206593741094140 c4: -163179388668012795 c5: 32432400 Y0: -11270179324131638245556203644465900795204 Y1: 642629618855033490953 [/CODE] |
C186_145_72
After a good deal of ECM, now hoping to find a poly for C186_145_72 from the xyyx project.
[code] 193827236134443466098224493848711326783427017152262904952196883820082655569819229847578714306889013642271468466999382170099561997247424941621375124328481656372181577090568838136723217969[/code] Amorphia [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=445158&postcount=162] found a decent polynomial[/url] in a target range of 3.66e-014 to 4.21e-014. [code] # norm 4.544455e-018 alpha -7.010993 e 3.925e-014 rroots 5 skew: 42379359.70 c0: -124664909780140586713358287271932757503367520 c1: 19857214532726171166338731698655435478 c2: -80374314450663677283618496297 c3: -37388316203874674366923 c4: -86114669846817 c5: 4697244 Y0: -528584393658161950693242720222768713 Y1: 17611375245262387 [/code] Can anyone help find a better poly? Thank you in advance. |
[QUOTE=Gimarel;444841]I hope that it's not to late. Here's a better poly for 11,671M[/QUOTE]
It wasn't. We used yours. Also, thanks for the others! |
[QUOTE=swellman;445475]After a good deal of ECM, now hoping to find a poly for C186_145_72 from the xyyx project.
[code] 193827236134443466098224493848711326783427017152262904952196883820082655569819229847578714306889013642271468466999382170099561997247424941621375124328481656372181577090568838136723217969[/code] Amorphia [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=445158&postcount=162] found a decent polynomial[/url] in a target range of 3.66e-014 to 4.21e-014. [code] # norm 4.544455e-018 alpha -7.010993 e 3.925e-014 rroots 5 skew: 42379359.70 c0: -124664909780140586713358287271932757503367520 c1: 19857214532726171166338731698655435478 c2: -80374314450663677283618496297 c3: -37388316203874674366923 c4: -86114669846817 c5: 4697244 Y0: -528584393658161950693242720222768713 Y1: 17611375245262387 [/code] Can anyone help find a better poly? Thank you in advance.[/QUOTE] Bump. Can anyone find a better polynomial? I don't have a GPU rig. Thanks. |
That's a pretty good poly score for a composite this size. I think you can just run with that one!
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 23:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.