mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Msieve (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=83)
-   -   Polynomial Request Thread (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=18368)

Max0526 2016-10-11 04:25

A better poly for 7,373-
 
amphoria's poly optimized by Msieve:
[code]Msieve v. 1.52 (SVN 958)
R0: -5467829758828677610003436226504845866790
R1: 2243695212369497491
A0: 1584717944544652111361338636393249829320243024039611
A1: 6244530518381050463416318502892817550281131
A2: 629863195693947805948443718832449
A3: -20338404899747920998286739
A4: -138103230226652
A5: 84600
skew 3205605172.37, size 3.829e-020, alpha -8.224, combined = 2.192e-015[/code]and optimized by CADO-NFS:
[code]R0: -5467829758828662556877248212981357943492
R1: 2243695212369497491
A0: 1626635195880018080222702174245256552779602603760905
A1: 6250235554810812252292008498864856719101331
A2: 220470318981252617710909918321915
A3: -20342073001200933131010163
A4: -135265290232652
A5: 84600
skew 3200000000.00, size 3.829e-020, alpha -8.224, combined = 2.192e-015[/code]

frmky 2016-10-11 04:56

Thanks! Here's the best I have for 3,703+. Any better?

[CODE]# norm 1.545586e-20 alpha -9.074452 e 1.105e-15 rroots 5
skew: 6828818355.54
c0: -3222407615029835973560010490181467735307547633105653229
c1: 53407489570586699321783320626147667384387545
c2: 508377025734147691722344152203042945
c3: 4963932753950165293475875
c4: -15264392838805076
c5: 87300
Y0: -36806438438806696151001861640305106430180
Y1: 95878183758594093197
[/CODE]

Gimarel 2016-10-11 07:21

Poly for 7,373-
 
The best poly for 7,373- so far.
I let the polyselection continue for a while.

[CODE]# norm 5.395003e-20 alpha -8.281925 e 2.465e-15 rroots 5
skew: 231930837.82
c0: 1109859739973746143552135465506542624348772748288
c1: 310742081699113752332876673724263235353432
c2: -1893309250118169889097154654861724
c3: -35083030189716491948709517
c4: 33132454354803206
c5: 85765680
Y0: -1369702819513586759963938688412616604455
Y1: 4928095242679925421737
[/CODE]I'll also look for a better poly for 11,671M.

pinhodecarlos 2016-10-11 08:48

Guys, please check here the current list of integers fed or to be fed to the grid.

[url]https://escatter11.fullerton.edu/nfs/numbers.html[/url]

Right now we are completing sieving of 6,460+, rest below until 2,1079+ is done for the moment.

frmky 2016-10-11 20:30

[QUOTE=Gimarel;444768]The best poly for 7,373- so far.
I let the polyselection continue for a while.

[CODE]# norm 5.395003e-20 alpha -8.281925 e 2.465e-15 rroots 5
skew: 231930837.82
c0: 1109859739973746143552135465506542624348772748288
c1: 310742081699113752332876673724263235353432
c2: -1893309250118169889097154654861724
c3: -35083030189716491948709517
c4: 33132454354803206
c5: 85765680
Y0: -1369702819513586759963938688412616604455
Y1: 4928095242679925421737
[/CODE]I'll also look for a better poly for 11,671M.[/QUOTE]
That is considerably better! It reduced the sieving limit from 900M to 560M, and has been submitted to the grid. I will be submitting 11,671M to the grid tomorrow and 3,703+ likely on Friday.

Gimarel 2016-10-12 08:38

Poly for 11,671M
 
I hope that it's not to late. Here's a better poly for 11,671M

[CODE]# norm 8.091519e-20 alpha -8.408878 e 3.155833e-15 rroots 3
skew: 107996745.83
c0: -384559388390185238052831821407480574899673604700
c1: 10748085832694954935447027998148092938830
c2: -1164025190784195463005285907975877
c3: -354531071225021313786850
c4: 205123799151128142
c5: 86486400
Y0: -526170659967914909260231849693059494667
Y1: 100970794921171919629
[/CODE]

Gimarel 2016-10-14 10:25

Polys for 3,703+
 
Two better polys for 3,703+.
Which one is better depends on the range that is planned to sieve.

[CODE]# norm 1.788690e-20 alpha -9.107335 e 1.209056e-15 rroots 5
skew: 1040457091.81
c0: 1583660106005744401792960601946449485424231137783647
c1: 15953961199680499009778025002496801434399971
c2: -140172291645084630128051775699400961
c3: -165085700085592379731475499
c4: 128745925779910842
c5: 10810800
Y0: -14039611074004526205668931098288258056250
Y1: 1795190936105720178911

# norm 1.756253e-20 alpha -8.014349 e 1.202329e-15 rroots 5
skew: 390528386.88
c0: -95931493762884947193763908866486388707708521012621
c1: 902610674111945855170224516493427015147524
c2: 22588972639631322195766454630626432
c3: -58575064413206593741094140
c4: -163179388668012795
c5: 32432400
Y0: -11270179324131638245556203644465900795204
Y1: 642629618855033490953
[/CODE]

swellman 2016-10-21 01:35

C186_145_72
 
After a good deal of ECM, now hoping to find a poly for C186_145_72 from the xyyx project.

[code]
193827236134443466098224493848711326783427017152262904952196883820082655569819229847578714306889013642271468466999382170099561997247424941621375124328481656372181577090568838136723217969[/code]


Amorphia [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=445158&postcount=162] found a decent polynomial[/url] in a target range of 3.66e-014 to 4.21e-014.

[code]
# norm 4.544455e-018 alpha -7.010993 e 3.925e-014 rroots 5
skew: 42379359.70
c0: -124664909780140586713358287271932757503367520
c1: 19857214532726171166338731698655435478
c2: -80374314450663677283618496297
c3: -37388316203874674366923
c4: -86114669846817
c5: 4697244
Y0: -528584393658161950693242720222768713
Y1: 17611375245262387
[/code]

Can anyone help find a better poly? Thank you in advance.

frmky 2016-10-22 06:36

[QUOTE=Gimarel;444841]I hope that it's not to late. Here's a better poly for 11,671M[/QUOTE]
It wasn't. We used yours. Also, thanks for the others!

swellman 2016-10-31 01:26

[QUOTE=swellman;445475]After a good deal of ECM, now hoping to find a poly for C186_145_72 from the xyyx project.

[code]
193827236134443466098224493848711326783427017152262904952196883820082655569819229847578714306889013642271468466999382170099561997247424941621375124328481656372181577090568838136723217969[/code]


Amorphia [url=http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=445158&postcount=162] found a decent polynomial[/url] in a target range of 3.66e-014 to 4.21e-014.

[code]
# norm 4.544455e-018 alpha -7.010993 e 3.925e-014 rroots 5
skew: 42379359.70
c0: -124664909780140586713358287271932757503367520
c1: 19857214532726171166338731698655435478
c2: -80374314450663677283618496297
c3: -37388316203874674366923
c4: -86114669846817
c5: 4697244
Y0: -528584393658161950693242720222768713
Y1: 17611375245262387
[/code]

Can anyone help find a better poly? Thank you in advance.[/QUOTE]

Bump. Can anyone find a better polynomial? I don't have a GPU rig. Thanks.

VBCurtis 2016-10-31 03:40

That's a pretty good poly score for a composite this size. I think you can just run with that one!


All times are UTC. The time now is 23:06.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.