Got a few things running, but I'll start on it in the next few days.

Much appreciated.

expecting poly E from 4.22e-013 to > 4.86e-013
will work on it too.

preliminary result for C168_130_119
[code]
R0: -121129078517396674493795704581707
R1: 513757113756130643
A0: -4796903269477406166798789684544024219860
A1: -1939767502926488388012135203171094
A2: 2264947568446848147808930614
A3: 206624430427792427081
A4: -139943953521736
A5: 23746320
skew 3318318.29, size 1.784e-016, alpha -7.169, combined = 4.034e-013 rroots = 3
[/code]

swellman's c168
 

[CODE]polynomial selection complete
R0: -227978017295717387491052576991319
R1: 334228751938252481
A0: 7941283982567058051338218958227274263872
A1: 6915127316665357468354825657167608
A2: -8317133617647353685311875138
A3: -1096692340620013194727
A4: 116639833697250
A5: 1005480
skew 8345577.10, size 1.913e-016, alpha -7.700, combined = 4.146e-013 rroots = 5[/CODE]

C168_130_119 one high score poly + some descent poys
 

I think the first one is the best :)

[CODE]
# norm 3.309452e-016 alpha -6.772871 e 5.320e-013 rroots 5
skew: 4983821.76
c0: 766651483769690884156450979245674095088
c1: 278811327113080833132552475226228
c2: -486877516305152436528741204
c3: -75723643925170956549
c4: 23223814249498
c5: 343128
Y0: -282667867122049807121116622228207
Y1: 32263997011440997

# norm 2.580414e-016 alpha -6.891996 e 4.524e-013 rroots 3
skew: 9229870.18
c0: -6507553408028436049923247143836249209536
c1: 324174858082179064687832720999400
c2: -475865640426489627484304718
c3: -80092694551664956757
c4: 23142983586538
c5: 343128
Y0: -282667867123569893076313653360865
Y1: 32263997011440997

# norm 2.487297e-016 alpha -7.888867 e 4.389e-013 rroots 5
skew: 29075470.67
c0: -151182998551451046254189278612129230780659
c1: 310966680530461515110772672282345533
c2: -1185532912022151608903594934
c3: -852628767536768630873
c4: 876140598113
c5: 366660
Y0: -278942678676054982979392703674344
Y1: 622703014827614003

# norm 2.378519e-016 alpha -6.449070 e 4.295e-013 rroots 1
skew: 7615604.04
c0: 5304030502741371381099553902586421126235
c1: -988064173004279790426468471366795
c2: -559484248024988378302832781
c3: 34824294081182926435
c4: 25182846949378
c5: 343128
Y0: -282667867085208613645653525306808
Y1: 32263997011440997

# norm 2.341404e-016 alpha -6.748351 e 4.257e-013 rroots 3
skew: 21099264.98
c0: -109341917555554887351162873009011661766392
c1: 52590556007738097688707614438119260
c2: -497342503770980712297534910
c3: -228672465305989973864
c4: 2901684725561
c5: 220248
Y0: -308876793020521775974363328435137
Y1: 58645492669301761

# norm 2.327421e-016 alpha -8.013076 e 4.216e-013 rroots 1
skew: 24873638.53
c0: -121992426856646317460825437380531977730495
c1: 1997868202747435727518847403730219
c2: -5555948914005049370267374527
c3: -314735815305127014351
c4: -17490154352830
c5: 209880
Y0: -311869905589726464955428069172918
Y1: 238030916807335649

# norm 2.286308e-016 alpha -6.348933 e 4.195e-013 rroots 5
skew: 16731167.35
c0: -14757572477830763985700858840914365298465
c1: 21339868228914066280333835567268216
c2: -1890597129765872011191811276
c3: -192781848717064872284
c4: 5308659487361
c5: 220248
Y0: -308876792892340615874533815926242
Y1: 58645492669301761
[/CODE]

Yeah, I'd say you nailed this one. Well done! :)

Wow! Nice find. I think we can call this one completed.

Again thanks to all for the poly searches.

My next two GNFS targets from the Brent tables are:

26^166+1 C156:
946623013757147219625864939067745082911965016299846489279254360452818051702388560824867369272998194721465612739377486727611448360039208026082833642018168653

59^136+1 C156:
675390128507661963695965737962767154746560265893910723934379622603148393844014892081141360416088694085603922284504381363481469729329687787984834633038810689

Polynomials will be gratefully used in a few weeks.

Chris

Starting on 26^166+1.

Edit: expecting poly E from 2.20e-012 to > 2.53e-012

going for 59^136+1
expecting poly E from 2.25e-012 to > 2.59e-012