Back from my trip, will get something on the C162, starting at 50M

I'll start tomorrow at 34M.

Here's an initial result from running overnight:

[CODE]
1.08e-012 to > 1.24e-012
polynomial selection complete
R0: -5719863062929676337189207185251
R1: 22460096987790239
A0: -128933402178292703902590771718898699400
A1: 421073405536632376084222761455394
A2: 155681802860956564421675381
A3: -433348276277450790316
A4: -61576771533214
A5: 20120100
skew 1984142.36, size 7.914e-016, alpha -7.172, combined = 9.684e-013 rroots = 5[/CODE]

And here's one that's a bit better and is just shy of the expected range:

[CODE]polynomial selection complete
R0: -5715761102217972192913663491093
R1: 38563701940403731
A0: -94976223680906906931434983897990109960
A1: 149364296132506421129552303169504
A2: 134587764449354039562561949
A3: -152747267989982653284
A4: 28665952412356
A5: 20192400
skew 1730343.65, size 8.632e-016, alpha -7.223, combined = 1.031e-012 rroots = 3[/CODE]

my best so far
[code]
polynomial selection complete
R0: -4748246644759646013658813337922
R1: 42336859290668713
A0: -619873703155160995956575412212158768955
A1: 1965078609812576922972172806423063
A2: 619922077604339484846192349
A3: -669168682052209515627
A4: -105354140251766
A5: 51037800
skew 2417935.83, size 8.119e-016, alpha -7.716, combined = 9.668e-013 rroots = 5
[/code]

I got a 9.53 from my first 24h, so this composite is easy to find 9.5-9.7 polys for. We've often had one hit (perhaps a couple of polys) score 10% or more higher than our next-best, so I think 1.05-1.10 should be considered required on this one.

I think 15-20 GPU days is about right for poly select, so I plan to run this one until Thursday morning, or until we produce something > 1.10 - whichever comes first.
-Curtis

fed up by not finding anything worthy of mention in the 50M ( I poked and hopped around like a running rabbit), I went to the other extreme : the low -low leading coeficient
[code]
R0: -10864032340092650460535029544092
R1: 32032727516451869
A0: -2275201192054343365143953099059240923817
A1: 3451968411914398551120853008480077
A2: 976773581797898710041933604
A3: -93678023521421115437
A4: -15242981230347
A5: 813960
skew 7832394.35, size 8.233e-016, alpha -7.195, combined = 9.917e-013 rroots = 5
[/code]
the skew mightbe a bit high but it is below 10M

c162
 

Thanks for all the work everyone has put in. I ran a test case the old fashion way on a GTX 460 just to see what results would pop out.
[CODE]./msieve -g 0 -np 9000000,9010000[/CODE]
[CODE]polynomial selection complete
R0: -6717830615961110570319523537559
R1: 177535805879560157
A0: -3445835305282719729631217061289121337480
A1: 1606749357594607864448001376070484
A2: 2416637138668796096247825314
A3: -157043862458620231949
A4: -201589771126864
A5: 9003540
skew 3734135.90, size 7.198e-16, alpha -7.813, combined = 9.003e-13 rroots = 5
elapsed time 01:58:45[/CODE]
It sounds like Curtis (and I have no idea what I am talking about in this thread) has the ideal situation figured out.

Lionel will grab the best poly(s) and take it from here near the end of the week.

Day 2 produced a 1.06 and a 1.02 for me.

Getting closer...

The 1.06 has size norm 1.134 e-15 and alpha -8.45.

I have a 1.06 but with a skew in the 8M
[code]
polynomial selection complete
R0: -10677947295976653556937379369121
R1: 13890409330094671
A0: -1882698967868741615834498112375619451856
A1: 5449085563849428225995372678979884
A2: 112831863490588729696928604
A3: -169853532031477141371
A4: -1931876922250
A5: 887400
skew 8474905.70, size 9.142e-016, alpha -7.493, combined = 1.062e-012 rroots = 5
[/code]

Looks like we might have a really good one!

[CODE]polynomial selection complete
R0: -5687267901887849117628057930336
R1: 50226349167486893
A0: 173005616341925019068425420358687999075
A1: 206061802204907426411915664451175
A2: -490930924636416636463430237
A3: -56469426027893147207
A4: 155360648044842
A5: 20703312
skew 1853378.17, size 1.010e-015, alpha -7.702, combined = 1.121e-012 rroots = 5[/CODE]