C200
 

A few more with scores a bit worse but hoping at least one can be improved by Max.

[code]
# norm 9.981944e-20 alpha -7.648241 e 3.583e-15 rroots 5
skew: 9656661903.65
c0: 15814593842842758666131181362060227944236903185423215
c1: 92421141918994112071166249062419715541540850
c2: -8700038074230934293283812063185242
c3: -1810279238334858887062394
c4: 87253536396999
c5: 9516
Y0: -1375191354064811838431965872985306732352
Y1: 3156801492645074161


# norm 9.932519e-20 alpha -7.770819 e 3.574e-15 rroots 3
skew: 9949495045.12
c0: 257331074317305990444507785047542611249814764807317776
c1: 72276970282733565226204049235335558244362268
c2: -4881726693420490277339189013487330
c3: -2000412876400873445880614
c4: 55586872228899
c5: 9516
Y0: -1375191354066912834075365376256116019247
Y1: 3156801492645074161


# norm 9.947003e-20 alpha -7.556915 e 3.572e-15 rroots 5
skew: 8882002650.71
c0: 115588237217384955386355049156955042323460036840603931
c1: 74265911089535986784955953917986734855404318
c2: 3472115250429972754111117643691950
c3: -2127776985869815079577554
c4: -7740038754801
c5: 9516
Y0: -1375191354071114399588563062293357128162
Y1: 3156801492645074161


# norm 9.932519e-20 alpha -7.770819 e 3.574e-15 rroots 3
skew: 9949495045.12
c0: 257331074317305990444507785047542611249814764807317776
c1: 72276970282733565226204049235335558244362268
c2: -4881726693420490277339189013487330
c3: -2000412876400873445880614
c4: 55586872228899
c5: 9516
Y0: -1375191354066912834075365376256116019247
Y1: 3156801492645074161
[/code]

Max - Apologies if these are all just variations on the c=9516 theme that don't help.

First msieve hit from C200:
[code]# norm 1.060548e-19 alpha -8.306292 e 3.677e-15 rroots 5
skew: 697608847.11
c0: -40875461427637243387538732304230400612944885731471
c1: 337351765525998980707353108823320558700912
c2: 4854957201609301971262498131868888
c3: -12505209711201145384822768
c4: -10472604823577361
c5: 1009800
Y0: -541012060454628767650971980401131480162
Y1: 18838355335163598623[/code]

First from CADO:
[code]n: 46802612901958501868841642965751124516436202272587430374287737787818526612306217484595957815607978887434356$
skew: 515294842.026
c0: -18767604301794724568739522102957989342449153502601
c1: 1187430458137265550443270176264298191065767
c2: 252401375725248456245856214549773
c3: -6392702231042674615691663
c4: 1708421116152924
c5: 5027400
Y0: -609023179646324520044401061467999841338
Y1: 232970125802380714109627
# MurphyE (Bf=1.00e+08,Bg=1.30e+08,area=5.37e+16) = 2.15e-12
# f(x) = 5027400*x^5+1708421116152924*x^4-6392702231042674615691663*x^3+252401375725248456245856214549773*x^2+$
# g(x) = 232970125802380714109627*x-609023179646324520044401061467999841338[/code]
I didn't run the CADO poly through msieve to see its "real" score.

[QUOTE=Max0526;485315]@VBCurtis
Did you have a chance to test-sieve C197 polys?
Which one is the winner?[/QUOTE]

#1 and #3 (7.87 vs 7.57) are very close. Still testing additional Q values to get a more complete picture of the yield/timing curves. The 7.87 is faster, but the 7.57 yields 25% better; avoiding the higher Q values may make up the speed.

I'm also still unsure of best alim/rlim values, and the relative performance of the two polys changes with changes in lim's. My most-detailed effort is at alim=268M, rlim=400M. I'll try 268/268 before I post to the queue-thread.

Params are 33/66/2.7 rational, 33/95/3.7 algebraic.

@VBCurtis - you’re much more expert in test sieving than I, but in my experience I’d take a 25% increase in yield over a bit more speed all day long. Partly because speed is almost irrelevant in BOINC, but a poor yield can make sieving hard or even impossible if Q gets very large.

Just my $0.02.

That's where I lean as well for such a large job. Similar logic leads to giving up 10% of sieve speed to reduce lim's by 30%, as smaller lim's lead to smaller matrices (all else equal). Smaller lim's also mean less memory use; 400/536M made 15e use nearly 1000MB memory. Those large settings should work for the upcoming C200.

Yield with alim=400M, rlim=536M is very close to 2.0. With 268/400M, we're looking at yield of 1.8 and Q=50M-600M sieve range, entirely reasonable. That should produce 900M+ raw relations.

C200
 

[QUOTE=swellman;485316][code]
R0: -1375191354069134045183322114551111049796
R1: 3156801492645074161
A0: -338528721008222025614235066235791150075370103170041
A1: 1866015770516966978978053260633526834790530
A2: -527119001454503782276190397930010
A3: -2109749727333229354016618
A4: 22108294382679
A5: 9516
skew 3340598530.89, size 8.520e-20, alpha -7.008, combined = 3.630e-15 rroots = 5
[/code]

Better score than my last, though skew is still ridiculous . Hoping we can reach a 3.9+.[/QUOTE]
After spinning:
[code]
Y0: -2750382708133725334613417581253101468804
Y1: 3156801492645074161
A0: -332672675114694145181372303273491852806460469241208920
A1: 340888787128559157309935768355107525561775726
A2: -19908046545539943397396400874113167
A3: -3993710753834215715892388
A4: 56342996697999
A5: 4758
skew: 15629035780.85
# size 8.338e-20, alpha -9.049, combined = 3.704e-15 rroots = 5
[/code]

C200 poly
 

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;485320]First msieve hit from C200:
[code]# norm 1.060548e-19 alpha -8.306292 e 3.677e-15 rroots 5
skew: 697608847.11
c0: -40875461427637243387538732304230400612944885731471
c1: 337351765525998980707353108823320558700912
c2: 4854957201609301971262498131868888
c3: -12505209711201145384822768
c4: -10472604823577361
c5: 1009800
Y0: -541012060454628767650971980401131480162
Y1: 18838355335163598623[/code]

First from CADO:
[code]n: 46802612901958501868841642965751124516436202272587430374287737787818526612306217484595957815607978887434356$
skew: 515294842.026
c0: -18767604301794724568739522102957989342449153502601
c1: 1187430458137265550443270176264298191065767
c2: 252401375725248456245856214549773
c3: -6392702231042674615691663
c4: 1708421116152924
c5: 5027400
Y0: -609023179646324520044401061467999841338
Y1: 232970125802380714109627
# MurphyE (Bf=1.00e+08,Bg=1.30e+08,area=5.37e+16) = 2.15e-12
# f(x) = 5027400*x^5+1708421116152924*x^4-6392702231042674615691663*x^3+252401375725248456245856214549773*x^2+$
# g(x) = 232970125802380714109627*x-609023179646324520044401061467999841338[/code]
I didn't run the CADO poly through msieve to see its "real" score.[/QUOTE]

I can't spin the first poly. The second one with correct score
[code]
skew: 669955760.84960
c0: -18767604301794724568739522102957989342449153502601
c1: 1187430458137265550443270176264298191065767
c2: 252401375725248456245856214549773
c3: -6392702231042674615691663
c4: 1708421116152924
c5: 5027400
Y0: -609023179646324520044401061467999841338
Y1: 232970125802380714109627
# MurphyE = 3.79221133e-15
[/code]
spins into
[code]
Y0: -609023141860534518999014907067872816202
Y1: 232970125802380714109627
c0: 6597855742130600571092019979486718189877646469415
c1: 811355857686769572713280062435647502578631
c2: -2373973916391152933433647573915523
c3: -3961823123299030107336335
c4: 5785430560968924
c5: 5027400
skew: 615255866.07
# size 9.582e-20, alpha -8.316, combined = 3.999e-15 rroots = 5
[/code]
So close to a 4-handle!

C200 poly
 

Another small update.
[CODE]N: 46802612901958501868841642965751124516436202272587430374287737787818526612306217484595957815607978887434356766596560265669642422106894901815250576734687838908431237216708427946009827065503443998015551
R0: -408314216303435100435458262540789233919
R1: 24460427873149114483
A0: 37468162331679089171608618363581985765182102490960
A1: -375757402625087525587441184814759871150764
A2: -2914294123964357660509801097133188
A3: 11370155166060367158990339
A4: 11371636548964438
A5: 4123800
skew 469722874.58, size 1.011e-19, alpha -8.739, combined = 4.088e-15 rroots = 3[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Max0526;485315]@VBCurtis
Did you have a chance to test-sieve C197 polys?
Which one is the winner?[/QUOTE]

Test-sieve results at [url]http://mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=485368&postcount=1400[/url]

C205 poly
 

4.0-4.25M yields nothing of importance. Not even close to the lower end of the expected range.

Two more from CADO for the C200:
[code]n: 468026129019585018688416429657511245164362022725874303742877377878185266123062174845$
Y0: -563511441158041414351093946606736994835
Y1: 29915033353895765503452659
c0: 1021235896704812157082357616365625321869130166816
c1: -64007732066564918703662059235131605120594
c2: 310517199851716872059230176613607
c3: 14734054907549261050441789
c4: 23085508512199572
c5: -252046080
skew: 100405224.736
# # lognorm 64.56, E 55.74, alpha -8.83 (proj -2.60), 5 real roots
# # MurphyE(Bf=1.00e+08,Bg=1.30e+08,area=5.37e+16)=2.27e-12

n: 46802612901958501868841642965751124516436202272587430374287737787818526612306217484595$
skew: 146521018.669
c0: -1872442660276739919980290111336570069874058707196
c1: -102616412513426017372250882501958944741603
c2: 619869176564077326486899317186512
c3: 11587385283031159867231217
c4: -19570630283788782
c5: -57126960
Y0: -557949089283439773749209831628722353318
Y1: 210639254161220778464543
# MurphyE (Bf=1.00e+08,Bg=1.30e+08,area=5.37e+16) = 2.3e-12
# f(x) = -57126960*x^5-19570630283788782*x^4+11587385283031159867231217*x^3+6198691765640$
# g(x) = 210639254161220778464543*x-557949089283439773749209831628722353318[/code]
These score 6-7% better than the previous I posted, which converted to msieve score as 3.79; hopefully that means they're right around 4.0 before polishing!