I am done with C197 as well. Nothing better than 7.317e-15.
Jumping to C200. Will post my CADO setup for VBCurtis later today.
Waiting for your results of 3.4 and higher.

C200 poly
 

[QUOTE=Max0526;485227]Waiting for your results of 3.4 and higher.[/QUOTE]

An early result.
[CODE]R0: -410598653852714232341094400613990473828
R1: 12626617813791569939
A0: -72745779287073921769824738777445124803532848152615
A1: 1056552728038539670895880500812493158436809
A2: -4045854384060881180699631196122563
A3: -785342238610508868989285
A4: 8024791753847454
A5: 4010352
skew 691908938.98, size 8.361e-20, alpha -7.550, combined = 3.575e-15 rroots = 3[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Max0526;485227]I am done with C197 as well. Nothing better than 7.317e-15.
Jumping to C200. Will post my CADO setup for VBCurtis later today.
Waiting for your results of 3.4 and higher.[/QUOTE]

On the C200 I'm CADOing 500k-600k with nq=3125 and P = 14 million. That's about half a day's work on 21 cores, so I plan to continue in 100k blocks while adjusting P to see if poly quality changes.

I'd like to do some smaller ad-values with nq=15625, but you're welcome to try that yourself if you feel like it. I don't think there's any reason to search with nq=3125 and 15625 in the same range, though.

C200
 

[code]
R0: -1645800789218015401422392391392286679451
R1: 3491277860438334403
A0: -25383810721501766523056806529256583842310411785052133040
A1: 5487396690921945998181119567152100133976732348
A2: -26195113735719833159514610293986108
A3: -24237486042318169116579939
A4: -81689501553092
A5: 3876
skew 31625390930.46, size 7.811e-20, alpha -9.900, combined = 3.497e-15 rroots = 5
[/code]

Skew 31 billion, cough.
Alpha 9.9 on a deg 5 is quite remarkable, too.

The alpha seemed uncommonly high, didn’t notice the stratospheric skew.

Maybe Max can work his magic.:stirpot:

C200
 

[QUOTE=swellman;485255][code]
R0: -1645800789218015401422392391392286679451
R1: 3491277860438334403
A0: -25383810721501766523056806529256583842310411785052133040
A1: 5487396690921945998181119567152100133976732348
A2: -26195113735719833159514610293986108
A3: -24237486042318169116579939
A4: -81689501553092
A5: 3876
skew 31625390930.46, size 7.811e-20, alpha -9.900, combined = 3.497e-15 rroots = 5
[/code][/QUOTE]
Spin-off of the poly above:
[code]
Y0: -1645800789218028417772093014891647995395
Y1: 6982555720876668806
c0: -3175533682511449164974204552743404787963770514195209466
c1: 1371897751002159272285733885272842353701633071
c2: -12962015236982101445291157395431810
c3: -24236267268677490993233635
c4: -163523509998664
c5: 15504
skew: 15829341656.90
# size 8.101e-020, alpha -9.958, combined = 3.570e-015 rroots = 5
[/code]

[QUOTE=RichD;485242]An early result.
[CODE]R0: -410598653852714232341094400613990473828
R1: 12626617813791569939
A0: -72745779287073921769824738777445124803532848152615
A1: 1056552728038539670895880500812493158436809
A2: -4045854384060881180699631196122563
A3: -785342238610508868989285
A4: 8024791753847454
A5: 4010352
skew 691908938.98, size 8.361e-20, alpha -7.550, combined = 3.575e-15 rroots = 3[/CODE][/QUOTE]

Max, did RichD’s result scale? His raw score is better than my adjusted poly.

And might 3.5 now be a better minimum reportable score for C200?

C200 -- RichD's 3.575
 

[QUOTE=swellman;485284]Max, did RichD’s result scale?
And might 3.5 now be a better minimum reportable score for C200?[/QUOTE]
It didn't, sorry.
You are welcome to post anything you are comfortable with. I don't mind trying to spin it up. We'll probably make an adjustment after the first flare shows up.

C197 -- winner?
 

@VBCurtis
Did you have a chance to test-sieve C197 polys?
Which one is the winner?

C200
 

[code]
R0: -1375191354069134045183322114551111049796
R1: 3156801492645074161
A0: -338528721008222025614235066235791150075370103170041
A1: 1866015770516966978978053260633526834790530
A2: -527119001454503782276190397930010
A3: -2109749727333229354016618
A4: 22108294382679
A5: 9516
skew 3340598530.89, size 8.520e-20, alpha -7.008, combined = 3.630e-15 rroots = 5
[/code]

Better score than my last, though skew is still ridiculous . Hoping we can reach a 3.9+.