|
[QUOTE=chalsall;342558]Is [URL="https://www.gpu72.com/c10ck3r/"]this useful to you?[/URL] If so, 2.5 THz-Days of GPU TF of "What Makes Sense" to 74 in the LL range would be great! :smile:
Let me know if you'd prefer feet rather than meters.[/QUOTE] Indeed it will be! Thank you so much! I will reserve the batch momentarily! |
[QUOTE=c10ck3r;342559]Indeed it will be! Thank you so much! I will reserve the batch momentarily![/QUOTE]
You are most welcome -- it took me all of half an hour (I love Perl, and the diverse range of modules available). BTW, it's currently using the NAD27 ellipsoid; let me know if you'd prefer another (like WGS72, WGS84, etc). And thanks for the TFing. :smile: |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342561]BTW, it's currently using the NAD27 ellipsoid; let me know if you'd prefer another (like WGS72, WGS84, etc).[/QUOTE]
During a very hectic day, a couple of things popped into my head about this... First, it would be highly advisable to use the same ellipsoid that your GPS is using. It's less than a minute for me to set it to be anything you'd like. Secondly, are you using Differential GPS (or military grade)? Otherwise you're going to have much greater varation in your data feed than three inches.... |
[QUOTE=c10ck3r;342559]Indeed it will be! Thank you so much! I will reserve the batch momentarily![/QUOTE]
Love you Clocker! But do what actually makes sense. TF 63M+ to 73. I promise Chris will be grateful when the LL tsunami hits the fan. D |
[QUOTE=davieddy;342592]I promise Chris will be grateful when the LL tsunami hits the fan.[/QUOTE]
Oh, ye of little faith (and little knowledge of what's in the pipeline...). :smile: |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342591]During a very hectic day, a couple of things popped into my head about this... First, it would be highly advisable to use the same ellipsoid that your GPS is using. It's less than a minute for me to set it to be anything you'd like.
Secondly, are you using Differential GPS (or military grade)? Otherwise you're going to have much greater varation in your data feed than three inches....[/QUOTE] This is the base station we use: [URL]http://www.trimble.com/agriculture/base-stations.aspx[/URL] During operations, 4 RTK Fix is required at all times, which I think is mil. specs. This feeds to the auto-guidance system which then feeds back to my computer. Out of curiosity, will your tool work in offline mode? I didn't test it in field today due to local weather problems :( Knocked me down to a 7 hour day instead of 17 like yesterday! P.S. Do you just want me to report once in ~2 weeks, or daily as possible? |
So is this your farm?
[url]https://maps.google.com/maps?ll=37.976,-97.777&t=h&z=15[/url] |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342601]Oh, ye of little faith (and little knowledge of what's in the pipeline...). :smile:[/QUOTE]
A log jam preceeded by a long fart? Compare this with the regular 300 LLs/day. |
[QUOTE=c10ck3r;342611]This is the base station we use: [URL]http://www.trimble.com/agriculture/base-stations.aspx[/URL]
During operations, 4 RTK Fix is required at all times, which I think is mil. specs. This feeds to the auto-guidance system which then feeds back to my computer.[/QUOTE] Extreme coolness. :smile: [QUOTE=c10ck3r;342611]Out of curiosity, will your tool work in offline mode? I didn't test it in field today due to local weather problems :( Knocked me down to a 7 hour day instead of 17 like yesterday![/QUOTE] In all honesty, my "app" is simply leveraging on Geo::Ellipsoid. As in, it simply works with the given Start and End Lat and Long -- online vs. offline is irrelevant. The code is literally: [code] ... use Geo::Ellipsoid; ... $geo = Geo::Ellipsoid->new(ellipsoid=>'NAD27', units=>'degrees', distance_units => 'meter'); @Origin = ( $Lat1, $Long1 ); @Dest = ( $Lat2, $Long2 ); ( $Range, $Bearing ) = $geo->to( @Origin, @Dest ); [/CODE] [QUOTE=c10ck3r;342611]P.S. Do you just want me to report once in ~2 weeks, or daily as possible?[/QUOTE] Entirely up to you. |
[QUOTE=davieddy;342622]Compare this with the regular 300 LLs/day.[/QUOTE]
Actually, approximately 291.7 LLs/day over the last 30 days. |
[QUOTE=Xyzzy;342619]So is this your farm?
[URL]https://maps.google.com/maps?ll=37.976,-97.777&t=h&z=15[/URL][/QUOTE] Close, but no cigar. In all actuality, the approximation I used is from trying to mentally recall the coordinates of our seed packaging lab. I work for a company that does precision planting of probably 30 different locations, each one being planted to one (or more) of 4 different crops, planting at each location anywhere from 144 to ~4000, 200-400 sq ft plots with 12-30 inch rows, depending on the crop. We do this all over a 5 state region for seed and chemical companies as well as universities. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342629]Actually, approximately 291.7 LLs/day over the last 30 days.[/QUOTE]
No. There is a quirk in your table updates that means you only count 29 days of data between 00.00 and 08.00 UTC. Perhaps you could correct this. D |
[QUOTE=davieddy;342703]There is a quirk in your table updates that means you only count 29 days of data between 00.00 and 08.00 UTC.[/QUOTE]
Incorrect. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342733]Incorrect.[/QUOTE]
I despair. Here is a mini case study of "One LL" between 50M and 60M: [code] 7th June 19:00 Total Change Today 142557 0 Yesterday 142364 193 1 week 141191 1366 30 days 136562 5995 [B]I predict:[/B] 8th June 02:00 Total Change Today 142557 0 Yesterday 142557 0 1 week 141191+x 1366-x 30 days 136562+y 5995-y [B]where x and y are ~193[/B] [/code] D |
[QUOTE=davieddy;342765]Here is a mini case study of "One LL" between 50M and 60M:[/QUOTE]
You are such a twit... The [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/"]Visualisation Tool[/URL] updates once a day. Only once the current day's data is available do the databases update. BTW, have I said I think you're a twit? |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342780]You are such a twit...
The [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/"]Visualisation Tool[/URL] updates once a day. Only once the current day's data is available do the databases update. BTW, have I said I think you're a twit?[/QUOTE] Or perhaps he is willfully ignorant. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342780]You are such a twit...
The [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/"]Visualisation Tool[/URL] updates once a day. Only once the current day's data is available do the databases update. BTW, have I said I think you're a twit?[/QUOTE] Look at those tables now. Yesterday's, last week's and last month's data has updated, but "today's" hasn't. Hence the 29 day change istead of the thirty. BTW Have I said I think you are a twat? D |
[QUOTE=kracker;342782]Or perhaps he is willfully ignorant.[/QUOTE]
Entirely possible. |
[QUOTE=davieddy;342784]Look at those tables now.[/QUOTE]
Just did. They're not any different than what were there six hours ago. [QUOTE=davieddy;342784]Yesterday's, last week's and last month's data has updated, but "today's" hasn't. Hence the 29 day change istead of the thirty.[/QUOTE] Not quite sure where you're looking. Perhaps through a bottle? [QUOTE=davieddy;342784]BTW Have I said I think you are a twat?[/QUOTE] Many times. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342786]Just did. They're not any different than what were there six hours ago.
Not quite sure where you're looking. Perhaps through a bottle? [/QUOTE] Are you blind as well? [QUOTE=davieddy;342784]Look at those tables now. Yesterday's, last week's and last month's data has updated, but "today's" hasn't. Hence the 29 day change istead of the thirty. [/QUOTE] [QUOTE=davieddy;342765]I despair. Here is a mini case study of "One LL" between 50M and 60M: [code] 7th June 19:00 Total Change Today 142557 0 Yesterday 142364 193 1 week 141191 1366 30 days 136562 5995 [B]I predict:[/B] 8th June 02:00 Total Change Today 142557 0 Yesterday 142557 0 1 week 141191+x 1366-x 30 days 136562+y 5995-y [B]where x and y are ~193[/B] [/code] [/QUOTE] The tables are now exactly as I predicted. x = 204 y = 187 Careful reading of data is tedious but necessary. Intelligent interpretation of it will forever be beyond you. |
Hey twit-twats:
Try [URL="http://mersenneforum.org/mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=16263"]mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=16263 [/URL] Thank ye! |
[QUOTE=davieddy;342787]The tables are now exactly as I predicted.
x = 204 y = 187 Careful reading of data is tedious but necessary. Intelligent interpretation of it will forever be beyond you.[/QUOTE] A friend of mine once said to me "Don't fight unarmed combatants". Could you please provide the URLs you're referencing (which my spiders provide)? |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342790]
Could you please provide the URLs you're referencing (which my spiders provide)?[/QUOTE] I know it's a bit flaky, but I was quoting this obscure resource: [QUOTE=chalsall;342780]The [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/"]Visualisation Tool[/URL] updates once a day.[/QUOTE]I suggest you do likewise. |
[QUOTE=davieddy;342793]I know it's a bit flaky, but I was quoting this obscure resource:
I suggest you do likewise.[/QUOTE] More accurately [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/exponent_status_tabular_data/1/0/"]here [/URL] |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;340795]I will be in Tennessee on vacation all of next week, so I may fall behind a little on the LMH hours -
594.46 GHzD/10.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Uncwilly;342441]Aramis has been MIA since then. His twitter is not a very active account. Has he logged in since then?[/QUOTE]I have heard from him. He is ok, but his computer is under the weather, PSU problems. Just to check point for his convenience, I am at 1347 GHzDays. And on PrimeNet I am nipping at his heals for P-1 for the last 365 days. And now that somethings have stabilised, I may borg another machine. |
I've turned in 642 GHz-days in the 332M range in the last couple of days. Just consider that I'm picking up slack for Aramis.
|
[QUOTE=kladner;344527]I've turned in 642 GHz-days in the 332M range in the last couple of days. Just consider that I'm picking up slack for Aramis.[/QUOTE]
I have noticed the progress as shown here: [url]http://mersenne.info/trial_factored_tabular_delta_30/3/332000000/[/url] |
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;344529]I have noticed the progress as shown here:
[URL]http://mersenne.info/trial_factored_tabular_delta_30/3/332000000/[/URL][/QUOTE] The over-79 bit runs are someone else. I haven't committed that far yet this time around. I'll queue up a couple more shortly. |
[QUOTE=kladner;344545]The over-79 bit runs are someone else. I haven't committed that far yet this time around. I'll queue up a couple more shortly.[/QUOTE]I know you have been doing the 72->73.
|
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;344546]I know you have been doing the 72->73.[/QUOTE]Great.
I assume you mean LMH (=Lady Margaret Hall to me and Paul). We should win that £150,000 in a jiffy. Come back soon Aramis. We are missing you. (Not to mention Dubslow and Eric). |
[QUOTE=davieddy;344547]Great.
I assume you mean LMH (=Lady Margaret Hall to me and Paul). We should win that £150,000 in a jiffy. Come back soon Aramis. We are missing you. (Not to mention Dubslow and Eric).[/QUOTE] where did Aramis and Dubslow go? |
Hey all,
I should have posted something earlier - honestly it didn't enter my head that anyone would miss me, and I didn't want to frustrate myself by reading over the forums when I couldn't participate. My 750 watt power supply finally faltered on those 2 evga FTW cards + the pump for my system. It actually still runs with one of the cards unplugged, but if I turn on anything more challenging to the video cards than netflix the whole thing shuts down. I can't run prime95 for long either, as with the pump running on low power I don't have the flow to dissipate the heat through my ancient swiftech storm. A new power supply should be here tomorow. I have to flush my system with fresh fluid, but I would be surprised if it is not turning out a torrent of LMH numbers by monday. I'm just going to grab a bunch of them and let them roll. |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;344581]Hey all, I should have posted something earlier - honestly it didn't enter my head that anyone would miss me, and I didn't want to frustrate myself by reading over the forums when I couldn't participate.[/QUOTE]
You might be surprised... We're actually a rather caring (if intense) group.... :smile: |
[QUOTE=chalsall;344583]You might be surprised... We're actually a rather caring (if intense) group.... :smile:[/QUOTE]
Same here. Was really wondering where he was...:max: and as swl said, where's Dubslow? |
Back on online!
Well, my power supply arrived DOA Friday, but the new one is in, the system is flushed, and prime95 is running alongside 2 instances of mfactc, so the system is fully functional and stable.
It's still heating up, but it's even running a little cooler than before, so great. I think the video cards are flushing assignments from before out, but both fetch files are configured to bring in lowest exponent > 332M to 79. I should probably get about 2 done per day till I'm all caught up. |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;340795]594.46 GHzD/10.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;344511]Just to check point for his convenience, I am at 1347 GHzDays. And on PrimeNet I am nipping at his heals for P-1 for the last 365 days. And now that somethings have stabilised, I may borg another machine.[/QUOTE]1610 GHz-days and climbing. On the i5's that I am working with, the stage 1 is outstripping the stage 2 (I have 2 cores working P-1 with MaxHighMemWorkers=1). I will have to give them some TF to chew on while waiting for more mem. |
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;345212]1610 GHz-days and climbing.[/QUOTE]
Crikey. It's going to take 16 days to catch up to that, with 13 for the backlog and 3 more for the work you'll do in the next 2 weeks. I do apologize for getting so far behind. There are 2 (332200157, 332200793) in the hopper now, and 2 more in the queue. |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;345218]Crikey. It's going to take 16 days to catch up to that, with 13 for the backlog and 3 more for the work you'll do in the next 2 weeks. I do apologize for getting so far behind. There are 2 (332200157, 332200793) in the hopper now, and 2 more in the queue.[/QUOTE]
You can count my modest contributions in 332M as part of the general trade-off with Uncwilly. The main thing is that work gets done, anyway. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342558]2.5 THz-Days of GPU TF of "What Makes Sense" to 74 in the LL range would be great![/QUOTE][QUOTE=c10ck3r;342559]I will reserve the batch momentarily![/QUOTE][QUOTE=davieddy;342592]But do what actually makes sense.
TF 63M+ to 73. I promise Chris will be grateful when the LL tsunami hits the fan.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=chalsall;342601]Oh, ye of little faith (and little knowledge of what's in the pipeline...). :smile:[/QUOTE][QUOTE=davieddy;342622]A log jam preceeded by a long fart? Compare this with the regular 300 LLs/day.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=chalsall;342629]Actually, approximately 291.7 LLs/day over the last 30 days.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=davieddy;342703]No. There is a quirk in your table updates that means you only count 29 days of data between 00.00 and 08.00 UTC. Perhaps you could correct this.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=chalsall;342733]Incorrect.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=davieddy;342765]I despair. Here is a mini case study of "One LL" between 50M and 60M: [code] 7th June 19:00 Total Change Today 142557 0 Yesterday 142364 193 1 week 141191 1366 30 days 136562 5995 [B]I predict:[/B] 8th June 02:00 Total Change Today 142557 0 Yesterday 142557 0 1 week 141191+x 1366-x 30 days 136562+y 5995-y [B]where x and y are ~193[/B] [/code][/QUOTE][QUOTE=chalsall;342780]You are such a twit... The [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/"]Visualisation Tool[/URL] updates once a day. Only once the current day's data is available do the databases update. BTW, have I said I think you're a twit?[/QUOTE] It updates [B]twice[/B] a day. At midday the data is updated with the new data (as of ~7.00 a.m.). At midnight you do something stupid: You increment the dates in the title of the "factoring depth" and exponent status tables, and in the case of the status, update the data for"yesterday", "last week" and "last month". As you point out so perceptively, you can't update "today" because you don't yet have the data. This is why between midnigh and midday, the monthly change is for 29 days and not 30. [B]The remedy is extremely simple:[/B] [B]cease your midnight escapades.[/B] [B]PLEASE DO IT NOW.[/B] [QUOTE=davieddy;342784]Look at those tables now. Yesterday's, last week's and last month's data has updated, but "today's" hasn't. [B]Hence the 29 day change instead of the thirty[/B]. BTW Have I said I think you are a twat?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=chalsall;342786]Just did. They're not any different than what were there six hours ago. Not quite sure where you're looking. Perhaps through a bottle?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=davieddy;342787]Are you blind as well? The tables are now exactly as I predicted. x = 204 y = 187 Careful reading of data is tedious but necessary. Intelligent interpretation of it will forever be beyond you.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=chalsall;342790]A friend of mine once said to me "Don't fight unarmed combatants". Could you please provide the URLs you're referencing (which my spiders provide)?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=davieddy;342793]I know it's a bit flaky, but I was quoting this obscure resource: [URL]http://www.ideas4lease.com/blog/about/[/URL] I suggest you do likewise.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=c10ck3r;342798]More accurately [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/exponent_status_tabular_data/1/0/"]here [/URL][/QUOTE] |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;345218]Crikey. It's going to take 16 days to catch up to that, with 13 for the backlog and 3 more for the work you'll do in the next 2 weeks. I do apologize for getting so far behind. There are 2 (332200157, 332200793) in the hopper now, and 2 more in the queue.[/QUOTE]
Well, next week will be [B][U]very[/U][/B] sparse for me. I will be on vacation, thus my laptop will be turning in less than its stock 1 per day. Further, this weekend, 3 of the minions will get an o/s update. At least 2 will be off-line (for P95 purposes) until my return.:ouch2: |
Great Googly Moogly. My computer has been churning out these LMH numbers, and it is only the thought of all that great p-1 work it's buying that kept me going at all. It makes me tired just looking at the computer crunching on these giant numbers all day. But hey, finally found a factor! Anyway:
The first dozen are [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=339622#post339622"]here[/URL]. There were no factors. 419.41 GHD/10. [code]Number | Work | Range | Date Reserved | GHzD | Status [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332216113"]332216113[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-05-08 01:26 | 322.47 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332205773"]332205773[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-05-09 17:16 | 322.47 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332207357"]332207357[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-05-12 06:08 | 276.41 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332201717"]332201717[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-05-14 02:35 | 322.48 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332221639"]332221639[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-05-14 02:35 | 276.38 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332218331"]332218331[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-05-16 00:07 | 276.40 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332222911"]332222911[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-05-16 00:07 | 276.40 | No Factor Kladner, picking up the slack! TY! | 642.00 | Factors? [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332200793"]332200793[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/3/2013 23:34 | 276.414 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332200157"]332200157[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/3/2013 23:34 | 276.414 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332201689"]332201689[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/3/2013 23:40 | 276.413 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332201237"]332201237[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/3/2013 23:40 | 276.413 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332204351"]332204351[/URL] | LL TF | 78-79 | 7/4/2013 22:40 | 184.274 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332201711"]332201711[/URL] | LL TF | 78-79 | 7/4/2013 21:40 | 184.275 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332204447"]332204447[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/5/2013 21:40 | 276.411 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332205623"]332205623[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/5/2013 23:40 | 276.41 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332207131"]332207131[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/6/2013 17:41 | 276.408 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332206999"]332206999[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/6/2013 17:41 | 276.409 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332207677"]332207677[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 7/7/2013 12:40 | 322.476 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332208007"]332208007[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/7/2013 13:40 | 276.408 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332213443"]332213443[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/8/2013 9:40 | 276.403 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332214803"]332214803[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/8/2013 12:40 | 276.402 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332195761"]332195761[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/9/2013 7:40 | 276.418 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332216791"]332216791[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/11/2013 1:46 | 276.4 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332216039"]332216039[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 7/10/2013 2:40 | 322.468 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332218409"]332218409[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 7/11/2013 4:40 | 322.466 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332217433"]332217433[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 7/11/2013 1:46 | 322.467 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332222797"]332222797[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/12/2013 9:41 | 276.395 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332221691"]332221691[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/12/2013 9:41 | 276.396 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332223053"]332223053[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/13/2013 7:40 | 276.395 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332223659"]332223659[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/13/2013 13:40 | 276.395 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332223713"]332223713[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/14/2013 2:40 | 276.395 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332224547"]332224547[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 7/14/2013 10:40 | 322.46 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332224643"]332224643[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/14/2013 21:41 | 276.394 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332224663"]332224663[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/15/2013 15:40 | 276.394 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332224757"]332224757[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/16/2013 0:40 | 276.394 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332194531"]332194531[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/16/2013 15:41 | 276.419 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332211203"]332211203[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/16/2013 22:40 | 276.405 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332225071"]332225071[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 7/17/2013 17:40 | 322.459 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332216359"]332216359[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 7/17/2013 15:41 | 322.468 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332226289"]332226289[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 7/18/2013 12:40 | 322.458 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332225239"]332225239[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/18/2013 11:40 | 276.393 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332228731"]332228731[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 7/19/2013 15:40 | 46.065 | 106162503180076083463529 [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332227529"]332227529[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/19/2013 14:40 | 276.391 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332230117"]332230117[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 7/20/2013 13:40 | 276.389 | No Factor [/code] 1676.741 GHzD/10 |
He is at 2,311 GHz days at the moment.
Sorry, shouldn't of said that. :edit: |
The first dozen are [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=339622#post339622"]here[/URL]. There were no factors. 419.41 GHD/10. The next set is 2 posts up from this one, garnering up to 1676.741 GHzD/10
[code]Number | Work | Range | Date Reserved | GHzD | Status [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332240287"]332240287[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-08-06 01:44 | 345.476 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332240351"]332240351[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-08-05 23:44 | 345.476 | 561155428179204038025743 [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332240281"]332240281[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-08-05 05:44 | 345.476 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332240201"]332240201[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-08-04 17:44 | 345.476 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332238583"]332238583[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-08-04 06:44 | 322.446 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332238469"]332238469[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-08-03 15:44 | 322.446 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332238553"]332238553[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-08-03 08:45 | 322.446 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332238091"]332238091[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-08-02 15:45 | 322.447 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332238449"]332238449[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-08-02 10:46 | 322.446 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332237557"]332237557[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-08-01 11:45 | 322.447 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332237359"]332237359[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-08-01 10:44 | 276.383 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332235901"]332235901[/URL] | LL TF | 78-79 | 2013-07-31 13:44 | 184.256 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332237027"]332237027[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-07-31 08:44 | 276.384 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332236999"]332236999[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-07-31 00:44 | 276.384 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332236481"]332236481[/URL] | LL TF | 78-79 | 2013-07-30 09:44 | 184.256 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332234003"]332234003[/URL] | LL TF | 78-79 | 2013-07-30 06:44 | 184.257 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332235269"]332235269[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-07-29 19:44 | 276.385 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332235619"]332235619[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-07-29 17:44 | 276.385 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332234339"]332234339[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-07-28 23:44 | 322.450 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332235179"]332235179[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-07-28 22:44 | 276.385 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332233687"]332233687[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-07-28 03:44 | 322.451 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332233861"]332233861[/URL] | LL TF | 78-79 | 2013-07-27 23:44 | 184.257 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332233043"]332233043[/URL] | LL TF | 78-79 | 2013-07-27 09:45 | 184.258 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332233477"]332233477[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-07-27 05:44 | 322.451 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332232757"]332232757[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-07-26 15:44 | 345.484 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332231299"]332231299[/URL] | LL TF | 78-79 | 2013-07-26 07:44 | 184.259 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332232569"]332232569[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-07-25 19:44 | 322.452 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332232473"]332232473[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-07-25 13:44 | 322.452 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332231623"]332231623[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-07-24 20:44 | 322.453 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332231171"]332231171[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-07-24 10:45 | 322.453 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332231101"]332231101[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-07-23 22:45 | 322.453 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332228791"]332228791[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-07-23 10:44 | 276.390 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332229943"]332229943[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-07-23 00:44 | 322.454 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332230277"]332230277[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-07-22 13:44 | 276.389 | No Factor [URL="http://[URL]http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332230189"]332230189[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-07-22 02:43 | 276.389 | No Factor[/code] Up to 2692.46. Switching the 'slow' card over to regular numbers, but the 580 is still pumping out LMH numbers because Unc seems to have upped his game a bit since before I had left. :) |
[QUOTE=kracker;346901]He is at 2,311 GHz days at the moment.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;348389]Up to 2692.46. Switching the 'slow' card over to regular numbers, but the 580 is still pumping out LMH numbers because Unc seems to have upped his game a bit since before I had left. :)[/QUOTE]I had a lull week before last. I was away from some of my borg. 2 were down for 9 days. Late last week one worker had run through all of its Stage1 work and was waiting for memory and gathered some LMH from PrimeNet. 2,746 as we speak. I have noticed the effect in the 100M range that you are having. I really do like all of the P-1 kills that I have been getting. I should also be in the top 30 of P-1'ers for the year within the week. |
Tragedy!
My 580 died last night. I'm still running on my 480, but until I get the 580 replacement from EVGA I'm going to be hard pressed to keep up with your massive army of minions. I finished the last two numbers my 580 had queued on my 480, but now I've got to turn it back to the 6 numbers I had in my 480's queue.
|
My sincere condolences on your loss. I hope replacement is expeditious. I begin to feel that number crunching is just plain rough on gaming cards.
I'll put something in the queue up in that range. |
[QUOTE=kladner;349891]I begin to feel that number crunching is just plain rough on gaming cards.[/QUOTE]
Thank you for the condolences and the offer. WRT the strain, it could be. But I've been running the 480 in the same loop for years, so I am a bit suspicious of the card on this one. I swear NVidia only releases quality cards every 3 years or so. |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;349941]Thank you for the condolences and the offer. WRT the strain, it could be. But I've been running the 480 in the same loop for years, so I am a bit suspicious of the card on this one. I swear NVidia only releases quality cards every 3 years or so.[/QUOTE]
You're welcome! It has seemed that some brands might hold up better than others, so I'm a bit surprised to hear of an EVGA going down. Along with Asus, they seem to be some of the better ones. I've got one each in progress on the 570 and 460, and two more interleaved with 6xM assignments in the queue for the 570. |
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;348401]2,746 as we speak. I have noticed the effect in the 100M range that you are having. I really do like all of the P-1 kills that I have been getting. I should also be in the top 30 of P-1'ers for the year within the week.[/QUOTE]Just to check point. 4,067 I have 46 P-1 factors since the start of this and have completer 1072 P-1 tests.
|
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;352468]Just to check point. 4,067 I have [B]46 P-1 factors[/B] since the start of this and have completer 1072 P-1 tests.[/QUOTE]
Waaa! No fair! I've only done a very small fraction of that number in the 332M TF range, admittedly, but still have yet to see a factor. On the other hand, I know Aramis has run a lot more than I have, and has only mentioned one factor. I guess I'll have to throw a few more at the wall and see if I can get one to stick. :poop: :unsure: |
[QUOTE=kladner;352470]Waaa! No fair! I've only done a very small fraction of that number in the 332M TF range, admittedly, but still have yet to see a factor. On the other hand, I know Aramis has run a lot more than I have, and has only mentioned one factor.
I guess I'll have to throw a few more at the wall and see if I can get one to stick. :poop: :unsure:[/QUOTE] Hey! no fair! only Aramis is supposed to do Uncwilly... but if you want you can pick me up and I can start P-1! :half-joke: [SIZE=1](I'm sure that would make Uncwilly happy--LOL)[/SIZE] |
332281699 Factored 32506374799431112750879
From my last batch in the range. WOOHOO! First ever for me at that altitude. :toot::fusion::banana::philmoore::george::chalsall::joe o: |
[QUOTE=kladner;352572]332281699 Factored 32506374799431112750879[/QUOTE]
Woo! :-D Those things are terribly rare. Regarding my card, I still have the same card. Apparently it got something spilled on it, and that's not covered. I tried to clean it some and have some mixed results. It seems like sometimes when the computer reboots it finds the card, and the card works just as well as ever. But sometimes it reboots and finds no card. So I'm doing what I can. It's been running for a few days now. I'll post my accounting of hours in the LMH range since the last time I posted And if you could post your hours Klad I'd appreciate it. Also if anyone else feels like doing LMH to match Uncwilly's mighty mighty army of p-1 drones, feel free! Clearly I'm not keeping up so well. |
The last post is [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=348389#post348389"]here[/URL], with 2692.46 GHD/10. There's been 4 factors so far, including todays set. GHD/10 so far is now up to 3369.6.
[code]Number | Work | Range | Date Completed | GHzD | Status [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242931"]332242931[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-09-23 08:43 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242909"]332242909[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-09-22 09:43 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332209541"]332209541[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-09-21 10:43 | 276.41 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332209531"]332209531[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-09-20 15:43 | 276.41 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242907"]332242907[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-09-19 19:43 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332235887"]332235887[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-09-18 18:43 | 276.39 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332225027"]332225027[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-09-17 21:43 | 322.46 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242829"]332242829[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-09-16 21:43 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242439"]332242439[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-09-15 19:43 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242187"]332242187[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-08-18 08:44 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242133"]332242133[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-08-16 22:44 | 322.44 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242171"]332242171[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-08-15 23:44 | 322.44 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242117"]332242117[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-08-14 19:45 | 161.22 | 182828077528306537537943 [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242093"]332242093[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-08-14 10:45 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242091"]332242091[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-08-13 11:45 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242007"]332242007[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-08-12 11:48 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332241941"]332241941[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-08-11 12:48 | 138.19 | 154379640999923508617839 [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332217007"]332217007[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-08-10 08:45 | 276.40 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332241691"]332241691[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-08-09 13:47 | 322.44 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332241191"]332241191[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-08-08 15:44 | 345.48 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332240369"]332240369[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-08-07 16:44 | 345.48 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332236621"]332236621[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-08-06 19:45 | 276.38 | No Factor[/code] |
I'm afraid this is everything I've done in this range. I'm not sure to what point my results previously have been tallied. (In two parts)
[CODE] [FONT="]332317291 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^73 to 2^74 5.7566[/FONT] [FONT="]332317291 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5132[/FONT] [FONT="]332317291 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^75 to 2^76 23.0264[/FONT] [FONT="]332317291 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^76 to 2^77 46.0529[/FONT] [FONT="]332317291 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^77 to 2^78 92.1058[/FONT] [FONT="]332296729 NF 2013-09-03 0.0 no factor for M332296729 from 2^73 to 2^74 5.7570[/FONT] [FONT="]332296729 NF 2013-09-03 0.0 no factor for M332296729 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5139[/FONT] [FONT="]332296729 NF 2013-09-03 0.0 no factor for M332296729 from 2^75 to 2^76 23.0279[/FONT] [FONT="]332296729 NF 2013-09-03 0.0 no factor for M332296729 from 2^76 to 2^77 46.0557[/FONT] [FONT="]332296729 NF 2013-09-03 0.0 no factor for M332296729 from 2^77 to 2^78 92.1115[/FONT] [FONT="]332291723 NF 2013-09-23 0.0 no factor for M332291723 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332291723 F 2013-09-23 0.0 64583125417846088683991 [/FONT]20.5314 [FONT="]332291569 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332291569 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332291353 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332291353 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332291329 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332291329 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332291321 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332291321 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332291279 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332291279 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332291261 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332291261 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332291131 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332291131 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332291039 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332291039 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332290811 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332290811 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332290807 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332290807 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332290513 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332290513 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5141[/FONT] [FONT="]332290339 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332290339 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289653 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332289653 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289521 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332289521 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289493 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332289493 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289479 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332289479 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289457 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332289457 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289409 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332289409 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289281 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332289281 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289179 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332289179 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289149 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332289149 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289127 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332289127 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289053 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332289053 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332289049 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332289049 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288947 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332288947 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288927 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332288927 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288909 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332288909 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288849 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332288849 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288839 NF 2013-09-21 0.0 no factor for M332288839 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288819 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288819 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288809 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288809 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288753 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288753 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288683 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288683 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288653 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288653 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288651 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288651 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288633 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288633 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288611 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288611 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288513 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288513 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288491 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288491 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288479 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288479 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288471 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288471 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332288251 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332288251 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332287987 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332287987 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332287777 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332287777 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332287691 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332287691 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332287673 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332287673 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332287663 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332287663 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5142[/FONT] [FONT="]332287621 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332287621 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332287427 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332287427 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332287337 NF 2013-09-20 0.0 no factor for M332287337 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332287297 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332287297 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332287037 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332287037 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332286989 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332286989 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332286979 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332286979 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332286377 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332286377 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332286371 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332286371 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332286139 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332286139 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332286109 NF 2013-09-16 0.0 no factor for M332286109 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [/CODE] |
Part two:
[CODE] [FONT="]332286077 NF 2013-09-15 0.0 no factor for M332286077 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332286049 NF 2013-09-15 0.0 no factor for M332286049 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332285797 NF 2013-09-15 0.0 no factor for M332285797 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332285783 NF 2013-09-15 0.0 no factor for M332285783 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332285717 NF 2013-09-15 0.0 no factor for M332285717 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332285677 NF 2013-09-15 0.0 no factor for M332285677 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332285659 NF 2013-09-15 0.0 no factor for M332285659 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332285021 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332285021 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332285011 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332285011 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332284999 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284999 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332284993 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284993 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332284949 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284949 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332284919 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284919 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332284891 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284891 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332284859 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284859 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332284763 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284763 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332284747 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284747 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5143[/FONT] [FONT="]332284727 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284727 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332284723 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284723 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332284709 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284709 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332284663 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284663 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332284399 NF 2013-09-11 0.0 no factor for M332284399 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332284367 NF 2013-09-10 0.0 no factor for M332284367 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332284301 F 2013-09-10 0.0 29847029067698806872361 [/FONT]19.1134 [FONT="]332283883 NF 2013-09-10 0.0 no factor for M332283883 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332283733 NF 2013-09-10 0.0 no factor for M332283733 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332283613 NF 2013-09-10 0.0 no factor for M332283613 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332283529 NF 2013-09-09 0.0 no factor for M332283529 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332282147 NF 2013-09-09 0.0 no factor for M332282147 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332282099 NF 2013-09-09 0.0 no factor for M332282099 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332282047 NF 2013-09-09 0.0 no factor for M332282047 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332281997 NF 2013-09-09 0.0 no factor for M332281997 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5144[/FONT] [FONT="]332281699 F 2013-09-09 0.0 32506374799431112750879 [/FONT]20.5314 [FONT="]332281441 NF 2013-09-09 0.0 no factor for M332281441 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5145[/FONT] [FONT="]332281427 NF 2013-09-09 0.0 no factor for M332281427 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5145[/FONT] [FONT="]332281421 NF 2013-09-09 0.0 no factor for M332281421 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5145[/FONT] [FONT="]332281409 NF 2013-09-09 0.0 no factor for M332281409 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5145[/FONT] [FONT="]332279251 NF 2013-08-31 0.0 no factor for M332279251 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5145[/FONT] [FONT="]332279251 NF 2013-08-31 0.0 no factor for M332279251 from 2^75 to 2^76 23.0291[/FONT] [FONT="]332279251 NF 2013-08-31 0.0 no factor for M332279251 from 2^76 to 2^77 46.0582[/FONT] [FONT="]332279251 NF 2013-08-31 0.0 no factor for M332279251 from 2^77 to 2^78 92.1163[/FONT] [FONT="]332279243 NF 2013-09-01 0.0 no factor for M332279243 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5145[/FONT] [FONT="]332279243 NF 2013-09-01 0.0 no factor for M332279243 from 2^75 to 2^76 23.0291[/FONT] [FONT="]332279243 NF 2013-09-01 0.0 no factor for M332279243 from 2^76 to 2^77 46.0582[/FONT] [FONT="]332279243 NF 2013-09-01 0.0 no factor for M332279243 from 2^77 to 2^78 92.1163[/FONT] [FONT="]332279221 NF 2013-08-31 0.0 no factor for M332279221 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5145[/FONT] [FONT="]332279221 NF 2013-08-31 0.0 no factor for M332279221 from 2^75 to 2^76 23.0291[/FONT] [FONT="]332279221 NF 2013-08-31 0.0 no factor for M332279221 from 2^76 to 2^77 46.0582[/FONT] [FONT="]332279221 NF 2013-08-31 0.0 no factor for M332279221 from 2^77 to 2^78 92.1163[/FONT] [FONT="]332278799 NF 2013-08-30 0.0 no factor for M332278799 from 2^74 to 2^75 11.5146[/FONT] [FONT="]332278799 NF 2013-08-30 0.0 no factor for M332278799 from 2^75 to 2^76 23.0291[/FONT] [FONT="]332278799 NF 2013-08-30 0.0 no factor for M332278799 from 2^76 to 2^77 46.0582[/FONT] [FONT="]332278799 NF 2013-08-30 0.0 no factor for M332278799 from 2^77 to 2^78 92.1164[/FONT] [/CODE] |
3 factors in the 74-75 range, nice. I think I'd run them in that range too if it wasn't so hard to track the work. There haven't been any results reported in this thread from you since June/July, and these numbers are all from August/September, so 2 things come to mind:
First, that they are all unreported in this thread and second, that this is not the sum of work you've done in this range. Looks like about 210 GHD/10 using rule-of-thumb math, but I'll dump them into a spreadsheet to get a better sum unless you find more. :) |
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;353916]3 factors in the 74-75 range, nice. I think I'd run them in that range too if it wasn't so hard to track the work. There haven't been any results reported in this thread from you since June/July, and these numbers are all from August/September, so 2 things come to mind:
First, that they are all unreported in this thread and second, that this is not the sum of work you've done in this range. Looks like about 210 GHD/10 using rule-of-thumb math, but I'll dump them into a spreadsheet to get a better sum unless you find more. :)[/QUOTE] I can't be sure. [STRIKE]For some reason, I could not seem to find any 332M results in GPU72's table. I think I looked carefully.[/STRIKE] The results I posted were all I could find on the PrimeNet page. Of course, both of those are limited to 1000 entries. [OK. I went back to GPU72 and realized that how the entries are sorted makes a difference in what appears. I found 112 results by doing different sorts.] These got me back to 8/17/2013, (possibly) 14 more results: [CODE]Manual 332279221 LL TF 74 78 2013-08-29 14:38:29 2013-08-31 21:14:20 172.718 Manual 332279243 LL TF 74 78 2013-08-29 14:38:29 2013-09-01 14:44:40 172.718 Manual 332279251 LL TF 74 78 2013-08-29 14:38:29 2013-08-31 16:43:44 172.718 Manual 332296729 LL TF 73 78 2013-08-29 14:38:29 2013-09-03 17:44:00 178.465 Manual 332566459 LL TF 72 78 2013-08-24 16:46:10 2013-08-26 19:14:21 181.197 Manual 332566463 LL TF 72 78 2013-08-24 16:46:10 2013-08-25 14:44:40 181.197 Manual 332277689 LL TF 74 78 2013-08-19 21:29:45 2013-08-23 04:15:15 172.718 Manual 332277749 LL TF 74 78 2013-08-19 21:29:45 2013-08-20 20:14:57 172.718 Manual 332277769 LL TF 74 78 2013-08-19 21:29:45 2013-08-21 18:14:34 172.718 Manual 332277391 LL TF 74 78 2013-08-19 21:29:44 2013-08-20 20:14:57 172.719 Manual 332242297 LL TF 76 78 2013-08-17 04:10:33 2013-08-18 12:10:51 138.189 Manual 332314951 LL TF 73 78 2013-08-17 04:07:28 2013-08-17 21:44:46 178.456 Manual 332315153 LL TF 73 78 2013-08-17 04:07:28 2013-08-18 12:10:51 178.456 Manual 332315219 LL TF 73 78 2013-08-17 04:07:28 2013-08-19 20:44:55 178.456 [/CODE]I will go comb through my MISFIT results files and see what else I can turn up. I had no intent of messing up statistics. I really didn't pay attention to the dates. The work I do in this area is sporadic. |
And here are MISFIT results lines, connecting with the above, and winding back to mid April.
[QUOTE]Nothing more found going back to mid April. 6/18/13 no factor for M332192831 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] no factor for M332192831 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] 6/19/13 no factor for M332455703 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332455703 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332455703 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332455703 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332455703 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett77_mul32_gs] 6/20/13 no factor for M332455703 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] 6/28/13 no factor for M332196749 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] no factor for M332196749 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] 7/1/13 no factor for M332197469 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] 7/4/13 (Multiple dated results are probably combined below this point.) no factor for M332274193 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332274193 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332274193 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett77_mul32_gs] no factor for M332276261 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332276261 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332276261 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett77_mul32_gs] no factor for M332276261 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] Overlap with Code box content in previous post: no factor for M332314951 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332314951 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332314951 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332314951 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett77_mul32_gs] no factor for M332314951 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] no factor for M332242297 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett77_mul32_gs] no factor for M332242297 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] no factor for M332315153 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332315153 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332315153 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M332315153 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett77_mul32_gs] no factor for M332315153 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] [/QUOTE] |
[URL="http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/p-1/"]4,700 GHz-days expended[/URL], 51 factors found.
|
One more completion:
[SIZE=1] [SIZE=2]332317291 NF 2013-09-16 19:26 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] 92.1058 = 172.711 GHz-days 332317291 NF 2013-09-16 19:26 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett77_mul32_gs] 46.0529 332317291 NF 2013-09-16 19:26 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] 23.0264 332317291 NF 2013-09-16 19:26 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] 11.5132 332317291 NF 2013-09-16 19:26 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] 5.7566[/SIZE][/SIZE] |
[STRIKE]I am puzzled by the GPU72 Completed page. Sorted by either Assigned or Completed I can't seem to find just-completed 332M TF. I see 6xM TF and CPU P-1 which were reported at the same time.[/STRIKE] (They just took longer to appear.) However, it also would be helpful if clicking the Exponent column header toggled between Ascending and Descending sort.
EDIT 02: Here are a few more NF results- 332295967 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:07 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513 332295989 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513 332296067 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513 332296253 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513 332298151 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513 332298209 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513 332298229 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513 332298257 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513 |
I second the bit about the sort. If I could just sort by exponent (desc) It would be trivial to call up a list of every LMH I put in time on.
|
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;355476]I second the bit about the sort. If I could just sort by exponent (desc) It would be trivial to call up a list of every LMH I put in time on.[/QUOTE]
OK, I've put this on my "todo" list... (Why is it that todo lists always get longer, rather than shorter...? :wink:) |
[QUOTE=chalsall;355537]OK, I've put this on my "todo" list...
(Why is it that todo lists always get longer, rather than shorter...? :wink:)[/QUOTE] The more you give, the more people expect. :big grin: |
Some more No Factor results:
332297309 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332297321 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332297347 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332297477 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332299229 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332299283 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332299309 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332299339 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332299349 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332299397 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332299621 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332299687 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332299889 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 332299993 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513 |
[QUOTE=kladner;355546]Some more No Factor results:
332297309 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513[/QUOTE] Do what brings you pleasure. :big grin: That said, my 4 cores that I have running TF's from 74->75 in the range can process them in a reasonable time. (Got 2 cores running 73->74.) GPU's taking 75->77 or better are much appreciated (and can still turn them out in reasonable times.) |
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;355553]Do what brings you pleasure. :big grin:
That said, my 4 cores that I have running TF's from 74->75 in the range can process them in a reasonable time. (Got 2 cores running 73->74.) GPU's taking 75->77 or better are much appreciated (and can still turn them out in reasonable times.)[/QUOTE] I'll hit on the higher ranges. I was kind of getting off on clearing a column in the tables, but I'll go the distance on some, too. I admit that going to the release level of 81 is a slow process, even for a good GPU. But I'll aim for some 79's. EDIT 2: Given a certain number of GHz-days at my disposal, what would your preference be, Team Inspector? A small handful all the way to 81? Somewhat more to a lesser level? Give me some idea of your aimed at points. I'll try to accommodate to the extent that maintaining output in other zones allows. |
[QUOTE=kladner;355560]But I'll aim for some 79's.
Give me some idea of your aimed at points. I'll try to accommodate to the extent that maintaining output in other zones allows.[/QUOTE] If you are willing to go to 79, can you focus on numbers below 332246549 (the 1001[SUP]st[/SUP] number in range)? Will that tie up a GPU for 1 calendar day? (There are 2 remaining below 75 in the range. I might 'poach' them up to 75 just to clean up the range. :cheesehead:) If you only want to go to 77, pick up the lowest available below 332296579 (the 2001[SUP]st[/SUP] number.) BTW, I passed 5,000 GHz-days of P-1. Am now 20th in current P-1 ranking on PrimeNet and in the 60's for lifetime. |
I have [CODE]Factor=N/A,332244xxx,75,79
Factor=N/A,332244xxx,75,79[/CODE]in queue. One each per GPU. I may not have gone about it correctly. I put 332246549 as the upper limit, and asked for lowest TF level. There still appears to be one at 74 in the 332.2M range which I can't seem to snag. (This is on GPU72, not PrimeNet.) The two above will go into process in an hour or two. If there are others you'd like to get in, point me in the right direction and I'll add them. The current items will take about a day per GPU, give or take a bit for the differences between the cards. :smile: EDIT: Got [CODE]Factor=N/A,332284xxx,74,79[/CODE]which was the holdout at 74. If you had something else in mind, I might throw that back.....or maybe just interleave it further down the list. |
The last post is [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=353881#post353881"]here[/URL], with 3369.6 GHD/10. There's been 5 factors so far, including todays set. GHD/10 so far is now up to [FONT=Calibri]4348.45[/FONT].
[code]Number | Work | Range | Date Completed | GHzD | Status [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332244137"]332244137[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-10-08 06:44 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332244091"]332244091[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-10-08 03:43 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332243309"]332243309[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-10-07 06:44 | 322.44 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332243287"]332243287[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 2013-10-07 01:43 | 322.44 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332243279"]332243279[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-10-06 08:45 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332231213"]332231213[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 2013-10-06 01:44 | 276.39 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332243209"]332243209[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-10-05 08:43 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332243203"]332243203[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-10-05 04:43 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332243159"]332243159[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-10-04 09:45 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332243099"]332243099[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-10-04 02:44 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332243029"]332243029[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-10-03 09:43 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332243003"]332243003[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-10-03 01:43 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242969"]332242969[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-10-02 11:13 | 345.47 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332240159"]332240159[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-10-01 23:43 | 356.99 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332240089"]332240089[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-10-01 11:43 | 356.99 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332239253"]332239253[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-30 21:44 | 356.99 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332238437"]332238437[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-30 11:43 | 356.99 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332238407"]332238407[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-29 19:43 | 356.99 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332238073"]332238073[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-29 11:43 | 356.99 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332237981"]332237981[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-28 16:44 | 357.00 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332237797"]332237797[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-28 10:43 | 357.00 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332237483"]332237483[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-09-27 14:43 | 345.48 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332237617"]332237617[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-27 10:43 | 357.00 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332234827"]332234827[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-26 12:43 | 357.00 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332237453"]332237453[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-26 10:43 | 357.00 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332232931"]332232931[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-25 10:43 | 357.00 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332232977"]332232977[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-25 10:43 | 80.61 | 118787691707013852544999 [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332232949"]332232949[/URL] | LL TF | 74-79 | 2013-09-25 07:43 | 357.00 | No Factor [URL="http://"http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332242957"]332242957[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 2013-09-24 09:43 | 345.47 | No Factor[/code] |
[QUOTE=kladner;355567]I have [CODE]Factor=N/A,332244xxx,75,79
Factor=N/A,332244xxx,75,79[/CODE]in queue. They will be finished about 0700 CDT. :smile: |
A few more-
[CODE]332244553 LL TF 75 79 2013-10-08 01:25:32 2013-10-09 16:44:42 345.472 332244569 LL TF 75 79 2013-10-08 01:25:32 2013-10-09 16:44:42 345.472 332284207 LL TF 74 79 2013-10-08 01:41:49 2013-10-13 06:45:03 356.945 [/CODE] |
One more-
[CODE]332284207 LL TF 74 79 2013-10-13 356.945 GHz-days[/CODE] |
And another:
:smile: [QUOTE]no factor for M332246729 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] CPU credit is 23.0313 GHz-days. no factor for M332246729 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett77_mul32_gs] CPU credit is 46.0627 GHz-days. no factor for M332246729 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] CPU credit is 92.1253 GHz-days. no factor for M332246729 from 2^78 to 2^79 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] CPU credit is 184.2507 GHz-days[/QUOTE] |
Completed an hour ago-
[QUOTE]332247761 - LLTF 75-79 2013-10-22 - 345.468[/QUOTE] |
332265467 _ LL TF_ 75-79 2013-10-24 00:35:21 2013-10-25 02:43:41 345.450
I am curious why exponents factored to 79 do not then appear in that column in the GPU72 Available TF table. These seem to be getting released to LL workers. Is there no provision for P-1 work**, or is this an inefficient use of processing power in this range? **EDIT: .....or further TF work.... |
Any numbers TF'd to 79 or higher are released for work. It used to be lower, but now 79 is the number. You can factore numbers tohigher than 79 through gpu72, but you can't start at 79. It is possible to start at 78 if you use the 'highest factored' option.
Regarding the efficiency of factoring higher than 79, I think that is the case on only a couple of cards. Personally I don't like factoring higher than 79 because it messes with my numbers - I can factor from 64 to 79 in 24 hours. But going from 79 to 80 takes 25 all by itself, due to the mfactc algorithms getting less efficient past 76. |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;357513] [snip]
Regarding the efficiency of factoring higher than 79, I think that is the case on only a couple of cards. Personally I don't like factoring higher than 79 because it messes with my numbers -[U] I can factor from 64 to 79 in 24 hours. But going from 79 to 80 takes 25 all by itself, due to the mfactc algorithms getting less efficient past 76.[/U][/QUOTE] Exactly. Each step higher seems to take a bit longer than all that have gone before combined. I don't mean this as any exact representation, but I've seen a similar proportion. Thanks for the answer. I was just wondering. Am I presenting results here in useful format? I'm not really keeping track, but I know you were maintaining a spreadsheet balancing this work with Uncwilly's P-1 output. If a particular set of numbers would be helpful, i.e. the Manual Results output page, I'll make more of a point of doing it that way. |
I tend to post mine in batches of thousands of hours, to make tracking them easy. I don't think the format much matters, I only use the format I do because it's easy to modify gpu72's output to display it. Since only 1/10th the GHDs we put out are to match Uncwilly's GHD, putting a given number out here from 74-79 is what, 341 GHDs or so? So it matches to 34 of Unc's. Since he's got his minions running p-1 at record setting rates, we need lots of those. So yeah, my wrapups are just so I don't have to post them 4 times a day. :-D
I haven't done yours or Kracker's since... I don't even remember - August? Because they've been coming out in small pieces. Maybe I'll parse through the forums for the past couple months and roll them up. They are certainly appreciated. And certainly, if you or anyone can come up with a better way to track the numbers I'm all ears. Unc's numbers are easy to track because he uses gpu72 exclusively for this - I can just glance at his red line to see where he is. There's no easy way for me to separate my LMH tf from my regular tf on the public graph. |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;357619]And certainly, if you or anyone can come up with a better way to track the numbers I'm all ears. Unc's numbers are easy to track because he uses gpu72 exclusively for this - I can just glance at his red line to see where he is. There's no easy way for me to separate my LMH tf from my regular tf on the public graph.[/QUOTE]
I'm still trying to keep my head above water with regards to "real-work", but when I have some cycles I'll add the ability to select one's "Completed" report results based on range and/or dates. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;357621]I'm still trying to keep my head above water with regards to "real-work", but when I have some cycles I'll add the ability to select one's "Completed" report results based on range and/or dates.[/QUOTE]
Thank you, Chalsall. I understand that's not a priority. I'd still have to go through the list and post it either way. |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;357619][snip].....
I haven't done yours or Kracker's since... I don't even remember - August? Because they've been coming out in small pieces. Maybe I'll parse through the forums for the past couple months and roll them up. They are certainly appreciated. And certainly, if you or anyone can come up with a better way to track the numbers I'm all ears. Unc's numbers are easy to track because he uses gpu72 exclusively for this - I can just glance at his red line to see where he is. There's no easy way for me to separate my LMH tf from my regular tf on the public graph.[/QUOTE] On the first part above, perhaps I can troll through and come up with a list for you. In the future, I will collect at least a few to post at a time. I was only posting as they come out so that I would not forget altogether. Either GPU72 Completed, or PrimeNet Results pages work for me. Now that I think of it, though, the PrimeNet page lets you set the range which really makes it a piece of cake to get just 332M+ results. I was startled just now to see that I have done 458 bit-levels in the last 365. Of course, that number reflects a lot of single-bit runs, but there are also some exponents done through seven levels. Factors = 5 Total GHz-days = [FONT=Arial]11,850.5164[/FONT] |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;357619] Since only 1/10th the GHDs we put out are to match Uncwilly's GHD, putting a given number out here from 74-79 is what, 341 GHDs or so? So it matches to 34 of Unc's. Since he's got his minions running p-1 at record setting rates, we need lots of those.[/QUOTE]I found a new idle boxen to borg. I had it running TF on 4 threads as a shake down, now it is assigned to P-1 on 2 cores. That is now 10 cores doing P-1 (and 8 doing TF.)
:busy: |
According to this: [url]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/p-1/[/url] I have 6,354 GHz-days. I should move into 12th place (for P-1) before the end of the month. And may be 11th place on PrimeNet by the end of the year (and 35th lifetime).
|
[QUOTE=Uncwilly;358812]According to this: [URL]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/p-1/[/URL] I have 6,354 GHz-days. I should move into 12th place (for P-1) before the end of the month. And may be 11th place on PrimeNet by the end of the year (and 35th lifetime).[/QUOTE]
According to this: [URL]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/p-1/graph/11-20/[/URL] the slope of your line is a lot more extreme than mine. But that's OK. I have an affinity for the number thirteen, and green is my favorite color. :grin: EDIT 1: On the other hand, this: [URL]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/lltf/graph/9-18/[/URL] suggests that I have a pretty good chance of moving into the top ten in LL TF. I am a little less certain of moving above the tenth slot, though. Kdgehman and I seem to be running nearly parallel to each other, ATM, and KDG passed me up at a much higher rate than shows now, a while back. EDIT 2: I have a three 322.2M assignments completed to 79, and a couple more in the pipe. These are mostly 345 GHz-day runs, with one a little higher. |
Uncwilly [I]passed [/I]me in P-1?? Here I come... :bump2:
|
[QUOTE=kracker;358851]Uncwilly [I]passed [/I]me in P-1?? Here I come... :smile:[/QUOTE]
Gonna throw some heavy silicon at him? :edit: I hope you have a good supply if you hope to match that slope. |
[QUOTE=kladner;358853]Gonna throw some heavy silicon at him? :edit: I hope you have a good supply if you hope to match that slope.[/QUOTE]
I know what I am doing. I know what kind of firepower he has. I know what kind of firepower I have. EDIT: Although I am nothing compared to the t o p 3 or so. |
[QUOTE=kracker;358854]I know what I am doing. I know what kind of firepower he has. I know what kind of firepower I have.
EDIT: Although I am nothing compared to the t o p 3 or so.[/QUOTE] I will be watching with great interest! Go get him! :shark: |
[QUOTE=kladner;358857]I will be watching with great interest! Go get him! :shark:[/QUOTE]
... I have around 10 cores running P-1, will push another 10 or so in a few days. I may just get another quad haswell soon... :razz: |
[QUOTE=kracker;358859]I have around 10 cores running P-1, will push another 10 or so in a few days.[/QUOTE]If I dialed back the memory I allow each thread, I could add a few more cores. (I should have changed my mem settings on my desktop machine at work before I left on Friday, as it won't be being used until Wednesday.:bangheadonwall:) Currently, I have a decent amount and MaxHighMemWorkers=1 On some machines the stage 1 is so far ahead of the stage 2 that I have thrown some TF's (73->74 in the 100M range) in to balance the flow and sop up the power.
|
The End is Nigh!
Well this day came sooner than I expected. On the up side, Owltheevil's cudap-1 does not make my video cards scream. The cudalucas program did and the high pitched cries set my teeth on edge, so I had little hope for the cudap-1 program. Sure enough though, I did 5 p-1 numbers and although I can't figure out how to report the results, neither stage 1 nor stage 2 caused any noises to come from my video cards.
The ratio of GHDs I get doing cudap-1 vs doing TF in the LMH range is not quite 1:10, but I actually get more GHDs/Day doing the regular LL range, so in the end, it makes more sense for me to run p-1 on my video card than it does to run LMH TF in exchange for 1/10 P-1 hours. Also I see that due to the new p-1 power our TF in the LL range is no longer keeping up with our P-1 work, doubling the need for me to get back on to LL-TF. I will post the work I've done, and also the work I already have queued (which is considerable), and that will be a final tally for me in the LMH range. Uncwilly if you want to go back to DC'ing the LMH range once you meet the work hours I have queued I'd understand that. I'm only running on one card at the moment, so it may take a month for me to finish the work I have queued, but the hours won't change, so. |
I see. Well, someone will be sad. :no:
|
The last post is [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=355600#post355600"]here[/URL], with [FONT=Calibri]4348.45[/FONT] GHD/10. There's been 6 factors found so far, including today's set. GHD/10 so far for me is now up to 5495.41. Kladner added 1185.05 for 6680.46.
[code]Number | Work | Range | Date Completed | GHzD | Status [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332258503"]332258503[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 11/01/2013 04:43 | 322.427 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332248339"]332248339[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/31/2013 22:43 | 345.468 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332248333"]332248333[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/31/2013 03:43 | 345.468 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332258497"]332258497[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/31/2013 03:43 | 322.427 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332248327"]332248327[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/30/2013 08:43 | 345.468 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332258461"]332258461[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/30/2013 04:14 | 322.427 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332248277"]332248277[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/29/2013 13:43 | 345.468 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332248753"]332248753[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/29/2013 03:43 | 345.467 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332248249"]332248249[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/28/2013 22:43 | 322.437 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332248073"]332248073[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/28/2013 11:43 | 345.468 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332248181"]332248181[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/28/2013 11:43 | 345.468 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332248171"]332248171[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 15:43 | 23.031 | 95277971918488656349609 [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332248031"]332248031[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 14:44 | 345.468 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332248067"]332248067[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 09:43 | 345.468 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332247961"]332247961[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/19/2013 12:43 | 322.437 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332247967"]332247967[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/19/2013 10:43 | 322.437 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332247583"]332247583[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/18/2013 12:45 | 322.437 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332247701"]332247701[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/18/2013 12:45 | 276.375 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332247557"]332247557[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/17/2013 17:43 | 322.437 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332247533"]332247533[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/17/2013 12:43 | 322.437 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332247511"]332247511[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/16/2013 19:43 | 276.375 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332247529"]332247529[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/16/2013 12:43 | 345.469 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332203639"]332203639[/URL] | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/16/2013 00:44 | 276.411 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332246639"]332246639[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/15/2013 10:45 | 322.438 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332246549"]332246549[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/14/2013 10:43 | 322.438 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332246527"]332246527[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/14/2013 05:43 | 322.438 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332246231"]332246231[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/13/2013 11:43 | 322.439 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332245889"]332245889[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/13/2013 07:43 | 322.439 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332245439"]332245439[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/12/2013 11:44 | 322.439 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332245861"]332245861[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/12/2013 00:44 | 322.439 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332244929"]332244929[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/11/2013 04:44 | 322.440 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332245003"]332245003[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/11/2013 02:44 | 322.440 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332244541"]332244541[/URL] | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/10/2013 04:44 | 322.440 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332244587"]332244587[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/10/2013 04:44 | 345.472 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332244467"]332244467[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/09/2013 05:44 | 345.472 | No Factor [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=332244301"]332244301[/URL] | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/09/2013 04:44 | 345.472 | No Factor [/code] |
My pending work is partly done, but I took a block and did them breadth first and gpu72 doesn't consider them done until they're completely done. They've all been done up to 77 I believe, but anyway:
[code]332248507 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332248591 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332248603 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332248771 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332248783 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332248897 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332248907 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332248927 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332248963 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332248993 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332249279 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332249507 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332250389 | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 322.43 332250707 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332251393 | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 322.43 332251483 | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 322.43 332251873 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332251943 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332252021 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332252033 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332252087 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332252243 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332252363 | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 322.43 332253529 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332253617 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332253637 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:24 | 345.46 332253773 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 345.46 332253799 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 345.46 332253811 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 345.46 332253827 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 345.46 332253953 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.37 332253973 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332254217 | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 322.43 332254427 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332254471 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332254829 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332254903 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332254921 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332255083 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332255771 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332255899 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332255927 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 345.46 332256209 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332256403 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332256437 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332256443 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332256557 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332257043 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332257829 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332257909 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 276.36 332258513 | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 322.42 332258609 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 345.45 332258611 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:58 | 345.45 332258617 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332258657 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332260891 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332262097 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332262169 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332262199 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332262211 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332262277 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332262361 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332262373 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332262631 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332263003 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332263739 | LL TF | 77-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 276.36 332263871 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332263879 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332263901 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332263903 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332263913 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332263999 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332264057 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332264063 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332264081 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332264203 | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 322.42 332264299 | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 322.42 332264917 | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 322.42 332264957 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332265233 | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 322.42 332265299 | LL TF | 76-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 322.42 332265377 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 332265421 | LL TF | 75-79 | 10/20/2013 20:59 | 345.45 [/code]That's approx 2271 GHD/10, so when I'm done with them the total should be ~8931 GHD/10. I think this exercise was mutually beneficial, and I hope you feel the same. |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;358941]That's approx 2271 GHD/10, so when I'm done with them the total should be ~8931 GHD/10. I think this exercise was mutually beneficial, and I hope you feel the same.[/QUOTE]So that is my target number? If so, I will start to watch closely and slowly change machines over from P-1's to 100M TF's. I will start with tapering off the machine slowly and turn them over to 75 and 76 bit assignments. I might shoot for an even 9000 GHz days of P-1.
No sadness, only thanks for the help. [SIZE="1"][SUP][COLOR="White"]NeverShakeABaby[/COLOR][/SUP][/SIZE] |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 09:43. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.