[URL="http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/p-1/"]4,700 GHz-days expended[/URL], 51 factors found.

One more completion:
[SIZE=1]
[SIZE=2]332317291 NF 2013-09-16 19:26 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^77 to 2^78 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett87_mul32_gs] 92.1058 = 172.711 GHz-days
332317291 NF 2013-09-16 19:26 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^76 to 2^77 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett77_mul32_gs] 46.0529
332317291 NF 2013-09-16 19:26 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] 23.0264
332317291 NF 2013-09-16 19:26 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] 11.5132
332317291 NF 2013-09-16 19:26 0.0 no factor for M332317291 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] 5.7566[/SIZE][/SIZE]

[STRIKE]I am puzzled by the GPU72 Completed page. Sorted by either Assigned or Completed I can't seem to find just-completed 332M TF. I see 6xM TF and CPU P-1 which were reported at the same time.[/STRIKE] (They just took longer to appear.) However, it also would be helpful if clicking the Exponent column header toggled between Ascending and Descending sort.

EDIT 02: Here are a few more NF results-

332295967 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:07 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513
332295989 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513
332296067 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513
332296253 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513
332298151 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513
332298209 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513
332298229 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513
332298257 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-06 02:39:08 2013-10-06 14:43:30 11.513

I second the bit about the sort. If I could just sort by exponent (desc) It would be trivial to call up a list of every LMH I put in time on.

[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;355476]I second the bit about the sort. If I could just sort by exponent (desc) It would be trivial to call up a list of every LMH I put in time on.[/QUOTE]

OK, I've put this on my "todo" list...

(Why is it that todo lists always get longer, rather than shorter...? :wink:)

[QUOTE=chalsall;355537]OK, I've put this on my "todo" list...

(Why is it that todo lists always get longer, rather than shorter...? :wink:)[/QUOTE]

The more you give, the more people expect. :big grin:

Some more No Factor results:

332297309 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332297321 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332297347 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332297477 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332299229 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332299283 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332299309 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332299339 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332299349 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332299397 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332299621 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332299687 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332299889 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513
332299993 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513

[QUOTE=kladner;355546]Some more No Factor results:

332297309 LL TF 74 75 2013-10-07 19:43:58 11.513[/QUOTE]
Do what brings you pleasure. :big grin:


That said, my 4 cores that I have running TF's from 74->75 in the range can process them in a reasonable time. (Got 2 cores running 73->74.) GPU's taking 75->77 or better are much appreciated (and can still turn them out in reasonable times.)

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;355553]Do what brings you pleasure. :big grin:


That said, my 4 cores that I have running TF's from 74->75 in the range can process them in a reasonable time. (Got 2 cores running 73->74.) GPU's taking 75->77 or better are much appreciated (and can still turn them out in reasonable times.)[/QUOTE]

I'll hit on the higher ranges. I was kind of getting off on clearing a column in the tables, but I'll go the distance on some, too. I admit that going to the release level of 81 is a slow process, even for a good GPU. But I'll aim for some 79's.

EDIT 2: Given a certain number of GHz-days at my disposal, what would your preference be, Team Inspector? A small handful all the way to 81? Somewhat more to a lesser level? Give me some idea of your aimed at points. I'll try to accommodate to the extent that maintaining output in other zones allows.

[QUOTE=kladner;355560]But I'll aim for some 79's.
Give me some idea of your aimed at points. I'll try to accommodate to the extent that maintaining output in other zones allows.[/QUOTE]
If you are willing to go to 79, can you focus on numbers below 332246549 (the 1001[SUP]st[/SUP] number in range)? Will that tie up a GPU for 1 calendar day?
(There are 2 remaining below 75 in the range. I might 'poach' them up to 75 just to clean up the range. :cheesehead:)

If you only want to go to 77, pick up the lowest available below 332296579 (the 2001[SUP]st[/SUP] number.)

BTW, I passed 5,000 GHz-days of P-1. Am now 20th in current P-1 ranking on PrimeNet and in the 60's for lifetime.

I have [CODE]Factor=N/A,332244xxx,75,79
Factor=N/A,332244xxx,75,79[/CODE]in queue. One each per GPU. I may not have gone about it correctly. I put 332246549 as the upper limit, and asked for lowest TF level.
There still appears to be one at 74 in the 332.2M range which I can't seem to snag. (This is on GPU72, not PrimeNet.) The two above will go into process in an hour or two. If there are others you'd like to get in, point me in the right direction and I'll add them. The current items will take about a day per GPU, give or take a bit for the differences between the cards. :smile:

EDIT: Got [CODE]Factor=N/A,332284xxx,74,79[/CODE]which was the holdout at 74. If you had something else in mind, I might throw that back.....or maybe just interleave it further down the list.