![]() |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342780]You are such a twit...
The [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/"]Visualisation Tool[/URL] updates once a day. Only once the current day's data is available do the databases update. BTW, have I said I think you're a twit?[/QUOTE] Or perhaps he is willfully ignorant. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342780]You are such a twit...
The [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/"]Visualisation Tool[/URL] updates once a day. Only once the current day's data is available do the databases update. BTW, have I said I think you're a twit?[/QUOTE] Look at those tables now. Yesterday's, last week's and last month's data has updated, but "today's" hasn't. Hence the 29 day change istead of the thirty. BTW Have I said I think you are a twat? D |
[QUOTE=kracker;342782]Or perhaps he is willfully ignorant.[/QUOTE]
Entirely possible. |
[QUOTE=davieddy;342784]Look at those tables now.[/QUOTE]
Just did. They're not any different than what were there six hours ago. [QUOTE=davieddy;342784]Yesterday's, last week's and last month's data has updated, but "today's" hasn't. Hence the 29 day change istead of the thirty.[/QUOTE] Not quite sure where you're looking. Perhaps through a bottle? [QUOTE=davieddy;342784]BTW Have I said I think you are a twat?[/QUOTE] Many times. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342786]Just did. They're not any different than what were there six hours ago.
Not quite sure where you're looking. Perhaps through a bottle? [/QUOTE] Are you blind as well? [QUOTE=davieddy;342784]Look at those tables now. Yesterday's, last week's and last month's data has updated, but "today's" hasn't. Hence the 29 day change istead of the thirty. [/QUOTE] [QUOTE=davieddy;342765]I despair. Here is a mini case study of "One LL" between 50M and 60M: [code] 7th June 19:00 Total Change Today 142557 0 Yesterday 142364 193 1 week 141191 1366 30 days 136562 5995 [B]I predict:[/B] 8th June 02:00 Total Change Today 142557 0 Yesterday 142557 0 1 week 141191+x 1366-x 30 days 136562+y 5995-y [B]where x and y are ~193[/B] [/code] [/QUOTE] The tables are now exactly as I predicted. x = 204 y = 187 Careful reading of data is tedious but necessary. Intelligent interpretation of it will forever be beyond you. |
Hey twit-twats:
Try [URL="http://mersenneforum.org/mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=16263"]mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=16263 [/URL] Thank ye! |
[QUOTE=davieddy;342787]The tables are now exactly as I predicted.
x = 204 y = 187 Careful reading of data is tedious but necessary. Intelligent interpretation of it will forever be beyond you.[/QUOTE] A friend of mine once said to me "Don't fight unarmed combatants". Could you please provide the URLs you're referencing (which my spiders provide)? |
[QUOTE=chalsall;342790]
Could you please provide the URLs you're referencing (which my spiders provide)?[/QUOTE] I know it's a bit flaky, but I was quoting this obscure resource: [QUOTE=chalsall;342780]The [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/"]Visualisation Tool[/URL] updates once a day.[/QUOTE]I suggest you do likewise. |
[QUOTE=davieddy;342793]I know it's a bit flaky, but I was quoting this obscure resource:
I suggest you do likewise.[/QUOTE] More accurately [URL="http://www.mersenne.info/exponent_status_tabular_data/1/0/"]here [/URL] |
[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;340795]I will be in Tennessee on vacation all of next week, so I may fall behind a little on the LMH hours -
594.46 GHzD/10.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Uncwilly;342441]Aramis has been MIA since then. His twitter is not a very active account. Has he logged in since then?[/QUOTE]I have heard from him. He is ok, but his computer is under the weather, PSU problems. Just to check point for his convenience, I am at 1347 GHzDays. And on PrimeNet I am nipping at his heals for P-1 for the last 365 days. And now that somethings have stabilised, I may borg another machine. |
I've turned in 642 GHz-days in the 332M range in the last couple of days. Just consider that I'm picking up slack for Aramis.
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 01:13. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.