TF to 73+ for the last week ~ 1750 or 250 per day.

Well below the asking rate of 300+ per day.

No surprise that Chalsall is pissed off with me.

David

[QUOTE=davieddy;337068]TF to 73+ for the last week ~ 1750 or 250 per day.

Well below the asking rate of 300+ per day.

No surprise that Chalsall is [I][B]pissed off[/B][/I] with me. [emphasis mine]

David[/QUOTE]

I believe that the description for most of us would be better stated as "bored".

[QUOTE=kladner;337071]I believe that the description for most of us would be better stated as "bored".[/QUOTE]

:tu:


[SIZE=1][COLOR=silver](Remember kids, don't feed the trolls! :D)[/COLOR][/SIZE]

[QUOTE=bcp19;337055]I am the DC-TF powerhouse[/QUOTE]

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBecM3CQVD8]Pleased to meet you:smile:[/url].

From Chalsall's excellent data tables:
Last week:

3000 DCs TFed to 70.
600 DCs completed.

1150 LLs TFed to 74. 600 to 73.
2200 LLs completed.

I rest my case.

David

[QUOTE=davieddy;337075]I rest my case.[/QUOTE]

So you'll shut up now? Good.

[QUOTE=BigBrother;337077]So you'll shut up now? Good.[/QUOTE]

He will (or at least, should) after he sees tomorrow's report...

Something which should always be kept in mind is some Workers only submit every week or so....

[QUOTE=chalsall;337094]He will (or at least, should) after he sees tomorrow's report...

Something which should always be kept in mind is some Workers only submit every week or so....[/QUOTE]

Really? :grin:
Keep in mind that some people have a highly varying firepower, too. :sad:

Oliver
P.S. I did most of my TF assignments to 2[SUP]73[/SUP] this week but I didn't do the math, just followed my feeling.

[QUOTE=TheJudger;337102]I did most of my TF assignments to 2[SUP]73[/SUP] this week but I didn't do the math, just followed my feeling.[/QUOTE]I would say that you of all folk are entitled to do whatever you feel like!

As it happens, half of you doing 73 bits and the other half doing 74 enables the current fire power to keep pace with the rate of LL completions, as can be readily seen from Chalsall's excellent tables.

If I were doing any TF, I would have stopped by now THX to Chalsall's incessant bullying. I find his recruitment style leaves much to be desired.

3/4 through LL testing 59.5M ATM

Keep up the good work!

David

I was nicely asked by Chalsall in January 2012 to join GPU72.
I checked it out, had a question that was adequately answered, so I joined GPU72.

No bullying happened, and I don't think Chalsall is going to come after me if he really wanted to bully me.
For the price it costs to get where I live, he can buy 1 or 2 nice GPU(s) and have them running for a long time.

[QUOTE=bcp19;337055]I suggest you read this post again [U](follow the link, I've removed the text)[/U].[/QUOTE]
It clearly tells you to stop harrass Chalsall, as he implements what users ask (when they make enough sense).
You'd have Chalsall modify GPU72 so it only does what [B]you want[/B].

[B]NEWSFLASH[/B]: The world (nor this forum) does not revolve around you.
Be happy, you've received a thread that revolves around you.:smile:

[QUOTE=davieddy;337033]
This Primenet monopoly can be broken.
Who needs a single authoratative database?[/QUOTE]

Every single result is returned to PrimeNet's database, including those of GPUto7x team members. There is no subversion of the database going on.

[QUOTE=davieddy;337033]I'll recruit as many GPU owners to a private club as I can, and claim as much credit as possible.[/QUOTE]

Not a "club" and not "private". You, or I, or my brother's uncle's dog is welcome to sign up at the GPUto7x site and begin crunching assignments. Moreover, GPUto7x is registered as a team on PrimeNet. And the only people claiming credit would be the individual participants. Indivisible, personally indistinguishable team credit went the way of the dodo along with PrimeNet v4, some 4-1/2 years ago.

[QUOTE=davieddy;337033]Gee! That worked. Look at the GHz days we are churning out.[/QUOTE]

Yes...and the GHz-days that they are saving, which in turn, brings us closer to the next prime...

[QUOTE=davieddy;337033]Bet that wanker Davieddy wished he had this big iron.
He's a bit old, uppity and too smart for comfort though.
Better get him off my back before he exposes what I'm up to.[/QUOTE]

If GPUto7x were up to anything nefarious, for how long do you seriously believe that George would let the time, money, and energy that he has invested in his project (and 105,000+ users) go down the drain, before pulling Chalsall aside and shutting down GPUto7x?

[QUOTE=chalsall;337094]He will (or at least, should) after he sees tomorrow's report...

Something which should always be kept in mind is some Workers only submit every week or so....[/QUOTE]
Indeed.
A week is a good time to choose as our sampling period, since the submission rate fluctuates during it.

Allow me to cast my trained eye over last week's figures:

2300 LLs completed.
2300 TFed to 73+, [B]of which ~1000 were taken to 73 bits exactly. [/B]

A good week's work all round, and as I have been saying all week:
[B]IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT.[/B]

Cheers,
David