Meep!!
 

[Comm thread Mar 15 17:17] Sending result to server: UID: staffen/Romeo, M49306487 is not prime. Res64: [SNIP] AID:
[Comm thread Mar 15 17:17]
[Comm thread Mar 15 17:17] PrimeNet success code with additional info:
[Comm thread Mar 15 17:17] CPU credit is 90.3267 GHz-days.
[COLOR=#ff0000][/COLOR]
I finished a ll test issued by gpu72 (finally) but on gpu72 it says:
[COLOR=#ff0000]Warning:[COLOR=red]
[LIST][*]1 of your Lucas-Lehmer assignments have been tested by another worker. These are highlighted in red below with a dagger (†).Please understand when you turn in the results these will be credited as a Double Check by PrimeNet.[/LIST][COLOR=black]49306487 Lucas-Lehmer 72 --[/COLOR] [COLOR=#ff0000]† [I][B]2013-01-18 03:24[/B][/I][/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]

[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;333526][Comm thread Mar 15 17:17] Sending result to server: UID: staffen/Romeo, M49306487 is not prime. Res64: [SNIP] AID:[/QUOTE]

Sorry. I'm stupid...

I granted you access to fetch LL/DC work, but I didn't ask for your PrimeNet Display Name. This is what Spidy needs to know to grant you the "credits" for LL and DC work.

The warning you reported is a safety feature, intended to warn people if they've been "poached".

I really need to climb back into the GPU72 code base to fix some bugs, and add some needed features....

I think stupid is probably a stretch. :)

[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;333550]I think stupid is probably a stretch. :)[/QUOTE]

That's very kind. Thank you.

Anyone who makes a mistake must accept being called stupid.

It's part of the kind of work we do. Some are comfortable with it. Others, not so.

[QUOTE=chalsall;333551]That's very kind. Thank you.

Anyone who makes a mistake must accept being called stupid.

It's part of the kind of work we do. Some are comfortable with it. Others, not so.[/QUOTE]

I'd say that anyone (especially anyone writing code) can make a stupid mistake, but it doesn't mean you're stupid. :smile:

[QUOTE=Mini-Geek;333558]I'd say that anyone (especially anyone writing code) can make a stupid mistake, but it doesn't mean you're stupid. :smile:[/QUOTE]

Thank you. :smile:

I try to hold myself to the highest of standards.

If I don't, someone else will. My bosses. LaurV. Or Dubslow. Et al.

Yes, I'm paranoid. The question is am I paranoid enough?

Paranoia the Destroyer: [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSbSueq_KSY"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSbSueq_KSY[/URL]

[QUOTE=richs;333565]Paranoia the Destroyer: [URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSbSueq_KSY"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSbSueq_KSY[/URL][/QUOTE]

LOL...

There's a lot to be said for being paranoid.

Well you know what they say about being paranoid.

You only have to be right once. :D

[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;333573]Well you know what they say about being paranoid.

You only have to be right once. :D[/QUOTE]Even if you are paranoid, that doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.

Even a stopped clock is right - twice a day.
(It can be argued that for this objective function [number of times being right per day], it is more precise than almost any running clock.)