[QUOTE]Asus Titans against EVGA Titans…[/QUOTE]They are the same card.

[url]http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1747515[/url]

[QUOTE=Xyzzy;333121]They are the same card.[/QUOTE]
Haha, your fun detector was off. I was joking about the comparison table, which is missing random lines for both the cards, I guess that is what the manufacturer communicates (did you click the link?).

BTW: Asus card is better, you see how many features it has, comparing with EVGA which is just a "kepler", and additionally, for the Asus card you need no space, because it is dimensionless!

[QUOTE]Haha, your fun detector was off. I was joking about the comparison table, which is missing random lines for both the cards, I guess that is what the manufacturer communicates (did you click the link?).[/QUOTE]You are so sneaky!

:busted:

There are also many GeForce 500 cards on eBay at low prices, if you ever want to "upgrade" your GTX 690. But then again, buying used hardware on eBay is often hit and miss.

Attempt #2. Now we're talking.

Processing result: M( 29320283 )C, 0xc8b964e9933d3ee8, n = 1835008, CUDALucas v2.03
LL test successfully completes double-check of M29320283

Sweet. Matching residue.

2500MHz ram config for for the win.

-- Craig

We were going to sell the GTX660Ti, but…

4 * LL @ 3.7GHz + 1 * GTX690 + 1 * GTX660Ti = 458 watts = ~800GHz days/d
[LIST][*]We disabled SLI on the GTX690 and gave it the max settings in the .ini file, for maximum performance. (GPUSieveSize=128 & GPUSieveProcessSize=8)[*]We put the GTX660Ti as the primary display and gave it the minimum settings in the .ini file, for interactive responsiveness. (GPUSieveSize=4 & GPUSieveProcessSize=8)[*]We found that at our LCD's native 1920x1080 resolution the GTX690 did not give us any more FPS in the games we play. Apparently the video system is not the bottleneck. Frame rates range from 65 to 120, which is very playable. We have to pause the GTX660Ti AND Prime95 to play games, though. Not due to power draw but due to resource contention. We had to do this before we got the GTX690, too.[/LIST]We really want to automate work selection and submission so we might play with the MISFIT app. It looks awfully complicated, though.

:max:

[QUOTE=Redarm;332885]M( 57885161 )P, n = 3584K, CUDALucas v2.05 Alpha

proven in 55h[/QUOTE]

Ahh yeah, now that's VERY sweet indeed :smile:

Here's my recent DC result after 84 hours on a factory OC 900 MHZ, GTX-580:

M( 57885161 )P, n = 3670K, CUDALucas v2.03 :smile::smile:

P.S. My 680 would have taken 99 hours, while a 480, 113 h :bangheadonwall:

Bee-ee-a-utiful!

[QUOTE=Xyzzy;333133]We really want to automate work selection and submission so we might play with the MISFIT app. It looks awfully complicated, though.
[/QUOTE]
That was my impression too. Then I start playing with it. Now I am endorsing it. Scot did indeed a very good job. You have to try it.

What'd be the ETA on the titan to do a 100m digit test? I think we finally have a realistic way to test these numbers.

[QUOTE=axn;333140]What'd be the ETA on the titan to do a 100m digit test? I think we finally have a realistic way to test these numbers.[/QUOTE]

Only if Titan wears ECC RAM...

Luigi

[QUOTE=ET_;333149]Only if Titan wears ECC RAM...

Luigi[/QUOTE]

With the speed at which Titan could complete a test, that might not be necessary.