mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   News (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=151)
-   -   (M48) NEW MERSENNE PRIME! LARGEST PRIME NUMBER DISCOVERED! (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=17704)

chalsall 2013-02-05 18:17

Now the "meta news" kicks in...

[URL="http://www.businessinsider.com/scientists-just-found-a-new-prime-number--with-17-million-digits-2013-2"]Business Insider: Mathematicians Just Found A New Prime Number — With 17 Million Digits[/URL]... which is reporting on what New Scientist reported.

ATH 2013-02-05 18:18

M42643801: [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=175938&postcount=16"]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=175938&postcount=16[/URL]
[QUOTE=joblack;175938]I have found it but strangely it shows that it was found on 2009-04-12 02:27 - that can't be secret for so long?
[URL="http://mersenne.org/report_LL/?exp_lo=20000000&exp_hi=60000000&exp_date=&user_only=1&user_id=stigmv&exbad=1&exfactor=1&dispdate=1&B1=Get+LL+data"]
[/URL][/QUOTE]

M57885161:
[QUOTE]On January 25th at 23:30:26 UTC, the largest known prime number, 257,885,161-1, was discovered on Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS) volunteer Curtis Cooper's computer.[/QUOTE]


So this huge gap in GIMPS primes was from April 12th 2009 02:27 UTC to January 25th 2013 23:30:26 UTC, which is:

3 years 288 days 21h03m26s =
197.83963 weeks =
1384.87738 days =
33,237.05722 hours =
1,994,223.43333 minutes =
119,653,406 seconds

We made it below 200 weeks and just below 2,000,000 minutes = 120,000,000 seconds :smile: :cool:

ixfd64 2013-02-05 18:19

Yahoo! News: [url]http://news.yahoo.com/largest-prime-number-discovered-165757465.html[/url]
[I]Business Insider[/I]: [url]http://www.businessinsider.com/scientists-just-found-a-new-prime-number--with-17-million-digits-2013-2[/url]

Batalov 2013-02-05 18:21

Oh, yahoo! :davieddy: "Largest Prime Number Discovered" :davieddy:

ixfd64 2013-02-05 18:30

1 Attachment(s)
Meh.

ewmayer 2013-02-05 18:31

[QUOTE=Batalov;327796]Oh, yahoo! :davieddy: "Largest Prime Number Discovered" :davieddy:[/QUOTE]

That could go in the "Misleading Headlines" thread ... "because there are none larger than this one."

E_tron 2013-02-05 18:40

Wow, it appears that the GIMPS super computer still works :smile: Good job everyone. That was a long prime drought...

I still keep a few machine's pipelines stuff with prime candidates.

I started GIMPS in 1999 with AT compatible Pentium MMX 233MHz machine. This machine is still in service today and has contributed over 30 P90 years and >140 Trial Factoring jobs over the last 14 years! It's primary mission now is a NAS for remote backups, but it manages to squeeze some TF into its dated pipeline :smile:.

ewmayer 2013-02-05 18:40

[QUOTE=ewmayer;326529]I will say only that enough data have been leaked in this thread to narrow the exponent to within 1%, without any knowledge of GIMPS server traffic and such. But you have to learn how filter out the obvious noise, and thread sub-discussions which actually take things farther away from the correct direction.

I will explain after the official announcement.[/QUOTE]

Posted [url=http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=17742]in Math[/url].

ixfd64 2013-02-05 18:55

NBC News: [url]http://www.nbcnews.com/id/50707223/ns/technology_and_science-science[/url]

Another "largest prime number" fail.

firejuggler 2013-02-05 19:02

posted in the 'off topic' section of my favorite online game.... lets see if it light any discussion or anything

dbaugh 2013-02-05 19:26

In the New Scientist report of the latest Mersenne prime find they were compared to diamonds. Some rough calculations show that $1,000,000 was spent on electricity to run GIMPS over the last four years. These are very precious diamonds indeed.


All times are UTC. The time now is 21:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.