mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Linux (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   2.6.0 (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=1743)

Xyzzy 2003-12-18 05:33

2.6.0
 
[url]http://www.kernel.org/[/url]

:cat:

Xyzzy 2003-12-18 07:14

[CODE]Linux opteron 2.6.0 #2 Thu Dec 18 01:22:39 EST 2003 x86_64 unknown unknown GNU/Linux[/CODE]

Xyzzy 2003-12-18 07:38

Bittorrent:

[url]http://alge.nlc.no/linux-2.6.0.tar.bz2.torrent[/url]

Angular 2004-02-03 16:53

So it the 2.6 Kernel faster than the 2.4 Kernel?

I recall reading in this forum about the multitasking timeslice being reduced by a factor of 10 (?) and it was slowing down mprime.

Perhaps more importantly is it easy to upgrade?

gowen72 2004-02-03 22:35

The ease of upgrade really depends on the linux distribution you are running, if they support the 2.6 kernel then you should be pretty straightforward.

I use Gentoo and upgrading was easy, I've a friend who upgraded a Fedora box (using the 2.6 RPM) without any problems.

Jeff Gilchrist 2004-02-04 03:24

[QUOTE=Angular]So it the 2.6 Kernel faster than the 2.4 Kernel?[/QUOTE]

Here is an article that shows some perfomance differences between 2.4 and 2.6: [url]http://www.infoworld.com/infoworld/article/04/01/30/05FElinux_2.html[/url]

But that doesn't tell you how mprime will perform though...

Jeff.

Pablo the Duck 2004-03-19 21:33

I just compiled a 2.6.4 kernel on an Athlon 1200 box running Slackware 9.0. The kernel size was about 30% bigger than the old 2.4 default kernel and the speed looked to be about 2% slower. It's even more disappointing because the 2.6 kernel was running at a lower screen resolution.

geoff 2004-03-22 08:39

[QUOTE=Pablo the Duck]I just compiled a 2.6.4 kernel on an Athlon 1200 box running Slackware 9.0. The kernel size was about 30% bigger than the old 2.4 default kernel and the speed looked to be about 2% slower. It's even more disappointing because the 2.6 kernel was running at a lower screen resolution.[/QUOTE]

The speed difference is the same for my P4. Mprime benchmark averages about 2% lower with an otherwise idle 2.6.4 kernel than with a 2.4.25 kernel.

As far as the memory usage, I found that even though the 2.6.4 kernel image on disk is about 20% larger, it actually reserves slightly less memory once running compared to a 2.4.25 kernel.

Here are some of my stats. Machine is a hyperthreading P4, kernel 2.6.4 was compiled with all features present in 2.4.25, plus the anticipatory IO scheduler which is not in 2.4.25.

[code] 2.4.25 2.6.4
--------------------------------------------------------------
bzImage file size: 939K 1118K
Total kernel memory after boot: 8116K 7908K
mprime 384K FFT iteration time: 12.7ms 13.0ms
mprime 1024K FFT iteration time: 33.7ms 34.3ms
mprime 2048K FFT iteration time: 72.9ms 74.7ms[/code]


All times are UTC. The time now is 06:55.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.