Magical mystery tour-bo DC assignments
 

On my primenet Assignments page I have assignments assigned to one PC that are NOT in my worktodo.txt and that I did NOT ask for or manually assign.
Since I am using ProxyHost=gimps.gpu72.com:80 I am pretty sure it is a gputo72 issue.
My worktodo.txt:
[CODE][Worker #1]
DoubleCheck=26933813,69,1
DoubleCheck=26484223,69,1
DoubleCheck=26943799,69,1
DoubleCheck=27338921,69,1
DoubleCheck=27367369,69,1

[Worker #2]
DoubleCheck=26627561,69,1
DoubleCheck=26965031,69,1
DoubleCheck=26469893,69,1
DoubleCheck=26720627,69,1
DoubleCheck=26686949,69,1
DoubleCheck=27284927,69,1

[Worker #3]
DoubleCheck=26595901,69,1
DoubleCheck=26997823,69,1
DoubleCheck=26975521,69,1
DoubleCheck=26676071,69,1
DoubleCheck=26481239,69,1

[Worker #4]
DoubleCheck=26637557,69,1
DoubleCheck=26970637,69,1
DoubleCheck=26474257,69,1
DoubleCheck=26715239,69,1
DoubleCheck=27839419,69,1[/CODE]

My latest end-dates sent to the server...same list:
[CODE][Comm thread Nov 4 15:08] Updating computer information on the server
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:08] Sending expected completion date for M26933813: Nov 14 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:08] Sending expected completion date for M26484223: Nov 25 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26943799: Dec 07 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M27338921: Dec 18 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M27367369: Dec 30 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26627561: Nov 06 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26965031: Nov 15 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26469893: Nov 26 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26720627: Dec 08 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26686949: Dec 19 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M27284927: Dec 30 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26595901: Nov 14 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26997823: Nov 26 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26975521: Dec 07 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26676071: Dec 19 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26481239: Dec 30 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26637557: Nov 15 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26970637: Nov 26 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26474257: Dec 07 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M26715239: Dec 19 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Sending expected completion date for M27839419: Dec 31 2012
[Comm thread Nov 4 15:09] Done communicating with server.[/CODE]

What I see on primenet (I deleted irrelevant columns to assist formatting):
The 9 at the end (preceded by a *) are not on the other two lists.
Since the Assigned data is quite old for some of them I am quite certain they came from GPUto72 since it sets the Assigned date as the day it got the assignment from PrimeNet
[CODE]Core Exponent Assigned age days Updated
2 26469893 8/27/2012 0:49 69 11/4/2012 21:09
4 26474257 8/27/2012 0:49 69 11/4/2012 21:09
3 26481239 11/3/2012 21:03 1 11/4/2012 21:09
1 26484223 8/27/2012 0:49 69 11/4/2012 21:09
3 26595901 8/4/2012 0:48 92 11/4/2012 21:09
2 26627561 7/7/2012 1:12 120 11/4/2012 21:09
4 26637557 7/9/2012 0:50 118 11/4/2012 21:09
3 26676071 9/11/2012 0:51 54 11/4/2012 21:09
2 26686949 11/3/2012 21:03 1 11/4/2012 21:09
4 26715239 9/19/2012 0:51 46 11/4/2012 21:09
2 26720627 9/19/2012 0:51 46 11/4/2012 21:09
1 26933813 8/10/2012 1:10 86 11/4/2012 21:09
1 26943799 9/13/2012 1:14 52 11/4/2012 21:09
2 26965031 8/10/2012 1:10 86 11/4/2012 21:09
4 26970637 8/10/2012 1:10 86 11/4/2012 21:09
3 26975521 8/25/2012 0:50 71 11/4/2012 21:09
3 26997823 8/10/2012 1:10 86 11/4/2012 21:09
2 27284927 10/26/2012 18:509 11/4/2012 21:09
1 27338921 10/24/2012 0:49 11 11/4/2012 21:09
1 27367369 11/3/2012 21:03 1 11/4/2012 21:09
4 27839419 10/19/2012 1:49 16 11/4/2012 21:09
2 *27836041 10/20/2012 0:49 15 11/3/2012 21:01
1 *27389689 10/27/2012 0:51 8 11/3/2012 2:39
4 *27837127 10/20/2012 1:19 15 11/3/2012 21:06
2 *27836401 10/29/2012 0:20 6 11/3/2012 21:02
2 *27836119 10/21/2012 0:50 14 11/3/2012 21:01
1 *27836243 10/21/2012 0:50 14 11/3/2012 21:02
2 *27836903 11/3/2012 0:50 1 11/3/2012 21:02
4 *28703177 11/3/2012 21:04 1 11/3/2012 21:04
3 *28690997 11/3/2012 21:03 1 11/3/2012 21:03
[/CODE]

[QUOTE=petrw1;316990]Since I am using ProxyHost=gimps.gpu72.com:80 I am pretty sure it is a gputo72 issue.

...

The 9 at the end (preceded by a *) are not on the other two lists.
Since the Assigned data is quite old for some of them I am quite certain they came from GPUto72 since it sets the Assigned date as the day it got the assignment from PrimeNet[/QUOTE]

Yes, these were all assigned by GPU72, but I don't [I][U]think[/U][/I] this is an GPU72 "issue". Going through the "Traffic" logs between your computer and Primenet / the GPU72 proxy, these were assigned by GPU72, and then your computer "claimed" them from Primenet by reporting an estimated completion date.

For some of them, your machine reported the estimated completion every day (as its supposed to) for several days, and then all of a sudden sometime between yesterday (11.03) and today those nine appear to have dropped out of your worktodo.txt file without any further communications between your machine and the proxy / Primnet.

One additional piece of data which might help -- just around the time your machine was reporting all of the estimated completion dates for all your assignments yesterday (including the nine now missing), your machine requested and was given a new assignment (27835711) at 2012-11-03 21:00:22 UTC. [B][I][U]But[/U][/I][/B], it never reported an estimated completion which the clients usually do within seconds.

Without trying to pass blame (I'm always willing to accept my own SPEs...), from everything I can see this looks to me like a possible problem with Prime95 or your computer.

Have you gone through the prime.log file, and see if it gives any indication on what happened? Search for the nine candidates you starred above, plus 27835711. Any information there could be very helpful in figuring out what happened.

Please let me know if you'd like me to PM you the AIDs for the nine candidates which are missing, or if I should just recycle them.

Same here, happened sometimes. I did the assignments which did not appear in my worktodo lists using another card, worktodo done by hand/copy/paste) and reported the results and got credit. There is a glitch somewhere on this chain (with GPU72 as proxy), but as long as I get the credit for the work I do, then I don't care too much. Some forgotten exponents (in case they escape my vigilance :razz:) will expire and be done by other people, or someone will cry to my attention.

I have had exponents disappear from my worktodo magically too. It is a Prime95/Primenet interaction issue. Happens say once a year or two. Nothing to do with GPU72.

My bad.....
 

[QUOTE=chalsall;316999]
Without trying to pass blame (I'm always willing to accept my own SPEs...), from everything I can see this looks to me like a possible problem with Prime95 or your computer.

Please let me know if you'd like me to PM you the AIDs for the nine candidates which are missing, or if I should just recycle them.[/QUOTE]

Thanks...it was a PEBKAC error.

Problem Exists Between Keyboard and Client.

I unreserved in PrimeNet and in GPU72.
I hope that cleans is.

[QUOTE=petrw1;317206]Thanks...it was a PEBKAC error.

Problem Exists Between Keyboard and Client.

I unreserved in PrimeNet and in GPU72.
I hope that cleans is.[/QUOTE]

Maybe the /"thing"/ that operates the keyboard is overclocked a bit too much :unsure: