[QUOTE=davar55;413439]IN MONEY WE TRUST.[/QUOTE]
IN MONEY WE THRUST

[QUOTE=only_human;413614]IN MONEY WE THRUST[/QUOTE]
Heh! :smile:

[QUOTE=davar55;413439]IN MONEY WE TRUST.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=only_human;413614]IN MONEY WE THRUST[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=kladner;413653]Heh! :smile:[/QUOTE]
No comprende...

[QUOTE=davar55;413947]No comprende...[/QUOTE]

No comprend[U]o[/U].

Catholic Theologians To [URL="http://thinkprogress.org/culture/2015/10/28/3717003/ross-douthat-could-you-not/"]Ross Douthat[/URL]: Stop Writing About Theology. You’re Terrible At It.

[QUOTE]On Monday, a group of Catholic theologians [URL="http://dailytheology.org/2015/10/26/to-the-editor-of-the-new-york-times/"]published an open letter[/URL] directly challenging Douthat, who reportedly has little if any formal training in theology or Church history. The signers took particular umbrage with his most recent article, but also appeared to decry Douthat’s larger body of work on Catholicism — especially his tendency to [URL="https://twitter.com/DouthatNYT/status/657615283293679617?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw"]bat about accusations of heresy[/URL], often at Catholic theologians.


The text of the letter is below:[INDENT]On Sunday, October 18, the Times published Ross Douthat’s piece “The Plot to Change Catholicism.” Aside from the fact that Mr. Douthat has no professional qualifications for writing on the subject, the problem with his article and other recent statements is his view of Catholicism as unapologetically subject to a politically partisan narrative that has very little to do with what Catholicism really is. Moreover, accusing other members of the Catholic church of heresy, sometimes subtly, sometimes openly, is serious business that can have serious consequences for those so accused. This is not what we expect of The New York Times.
[/INDENT][/QUOTE]

[url]http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21677613-far-bolstering-generosity-religious-upbringing-diminishes-it-matthew-2239[/url]

[QUOTE]The upshot was that the children of non-believers were significantly more generous than those of believers. [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE]Quote:
The upshot was that the children of non-believers were significantly more generous than those of believers.[/QUOTE]

Things that make you go hmmm.....

[QUOTE=kladner;413971]No comprend[U]o[/U].[/QUOTE]

(different tense)

[QUOTE=davar55;415209](different tense)[/QUOTE]

What tense? It is a mis-conjugation. "[B][U]I[/U][/B] don't understand" = "No comprend[B][U]o[/U][/B]" You are mixing persons.

[QUOTE=kladner;415232]What tense? It is a mis-conjugation. "[B][U]I[/U][/B] don't understand" = "No comprend[B][U]o[/U][/B]" You are mixing persons.[/QUOTE]

OK, I meant no comprendi. Past tense.

[QUOTE=only_human;413614]IN MONEY WE THRUST[/QUOTE]

No comprendo. Is money as an institution good or bad?