![]() |
[QUOTE=tServo;366257]Luigi,
I'm wrapping up the 2 older ranges by the weekend. I have the new 29 range I just reserved. I will decide how much work I have ahead of me this weekend and let you know. If someone steps in before then, that's OK, of course.[/QUOTE] Thanks Marvin, the range has slowly paced duting the last six months, so there is no hurry. I just wanted to be sure that no holes were present among the ranges, as usual, and asked for help. Luigi |
[QUOTE=tServo;361788]Reserve,
FermatFactor=39, 6.1 * 10^16, 1.0 * 10^17 [/QUOTE] nada: [CODE]no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 61P to 65P (95-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 65P to 70P (95-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 70P to 72P (95-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 72000000000000000 to 72057594037927935 (95-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 72057594037927936 to 74000000000000000 (96-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 74P to 76P (96-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 76P to 78P (96-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 78P to 80P (96-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 80P to 85P (96-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 85P to 90P (96-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 90P to 93P (96-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 93P to 96P (96-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] no factor for k*2^39+1 in k range: 96P to 100P (96-bit factors) [mmff 0.26 mfaktc_barrett96_F32_63gs] [/CODE] |
[QUOTE=ET_;366293]Thanks Marvin, the range has slowly paced duting the last six months, so there is no hurry. I just wanted to be sure that no holes were present among the ranges, as usual, and asked for help.
Luigi[/QUOTE] The other 2^37 range I thought would be done this weekend, which was a hole in the range, will be done in about 4 days because I found a hole in my work. ( a hole within a hole? ). The 2^29 work I just started looks to take about 2 months or so. How long do you reckon ( a guess will do ) do you think it will take to finish your stuff in gtx 580 time? I am refurbing an old machine this weekend and may be able to use it. |
[QUOTE=tServo;366464]The other 2^37 range I thought would be done this weekend, which was a hole
in the range, will be done in about 4 days because I found a hole in my work. ( a hole within a hole? ). The 2^29 work I just started looks to take about 2 months or so. How long do you reckon ( a guess will do ) do you think it will take to finish your stuff in gtx 580 time? I am refurbing an old machine this weekend and may be able to use it.[/QUOTE] The range is a heavy one. It wil take 8-9 days to complete the bitlevel, and another month or two to complete the whole range in a not-24/7 fashion. Luigi P.S. Congratulations for reaching the top of the list! :bow: |
[QUOTE=ET_;366490]The range is a heavy one. It wil take 8-9 days to complete the bitlevel, and another month or two to complete the whole range in a not-24/7 fashion.
Luigi P.S. Congratulations for reaching the top of the list! :bow:[/QUOTE] OK, Luigi, you can PM me with the *.ckp and worktodo files at my Gmail account. I'll send you a message from there so You'll have the correct address to use. I can't believe I surpassed Batalov ! Oooops. I just realized I put my latest results in this thread instead of the results thread. Oh, well. |
[QUOTE=tServo;366512]OK, Luigi, you can PM me with the *.ckp and worktodo files at my Gmail account.
I'll send you a message from there so You'll have the correct address to use. I can't believe I surpassed Batalov ! Oooops. I just realized I put my latest results in this thread instead of the results thread. Oh, well.[/QUOTE] Ooops... I misunderstood you and sent the mmff source instead. A new mssage is coming! Luigi |
finally complete (with many stops - sorry):
no factor for MM31 in k range: 55P to 56P (88-bit factors) [mmff 0.27 mfaktc_barrett89_M31gs] reserving: MM107, 3P to 3.2P |
Now Reserving,
FermatFactor=36,310e15,330e15 Regards, Matt |
complete, no factors:
no factor for MM107 in k range: 3000T to 3200T (160-bit factors) [mmff 0.27 mfaktc_barrett160_M107gs] reserving: MM107, 3.2P to 3.4P |
complete, no factors:
no factor for MM107 in k range: 3200T to 3400T (160-bit factors) [mmff 0.27 mfaktc_barrett160_M107gs] reserving: MM31, 56P to 57P |
Complete:
[CODE]no factor for k*2^91+1 in k range: 1000000000000000 to 1125899906842623 (141-bit factors) [mmff 0.27 mfaktc_barrett152_F64_95gs] no factor for k*2^91+1 in k range: 1125899906842624 to 1300000000000000 (142-bit factors) [mmff 0.27 mfaktc_barrett152_F64_95gs] no factor for k*2^92+1 in k range: 1000000000000000 to 1125899906842623 (142-bit factors) [mmff 0.27 mfaktc_barrett152_F64_95gs] no factor for k*2^92+1 in k range: 1125899906842624 to 1300000000000000 (143-bit factors) [mmff 0.27 mfaktc_barrett152_F64_95gs] no factor for k*2^93+1 in k range: 1000000000000000 to 1125899906842623 (143-bit factors) [mmff 0.27 mfaktc_barrett152_F64_95gs] no factor for k*2^93+1 in k range: 1125899906842624 to 1300000000000000 (144-bit factors) [mmff 0.27 mfaktc_barrett152_F64_95gs] no factor for k*2^94+1 in k range: 1000000000000000 to 1125899906842623 (144-bit factors) [mmff 0.27 mfaktc_barrett152_F64_95gs] no factor for k*2^94+1 in k range: 1125899906842624 to 1300000000000000 (145-bit factors) [mmff 0.27 mfaktc_barrett152_F64_95gs] [/CODE] n=110...119 is almost done, too. Reserving: n=58...63, k=3e15...4.503e15 (i.e. 2^52) |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:29. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.