My vote....
 

6 possible stars (one for each category)
Platinum for 100%
Gold for 98% (or 99%)
Silver for 95%
Bronze for 90%
(Diamond? Kryptonite? if you have all 6 Platinum)

[QUOTE=petrw1;309713]4 X 90%+
2 X 100%

Personally:

I think 6 X 98% is doable.
6 X 99 a stretch.
6 X 100 .... special club indeed....not one I would likely get membership in.[/QUOTE]

Hmmm...I was already there (90%+) 15 months ago......(365 too; not any more)
[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=261251&postcount=696[/url]

Those are all interesting ideas.

How about "in the top 100" for each category? You get a star for each one?

(Although the 99% club sounded good.)

So I was bored....and I did some ciphering.
 

According to my ciphering (and I could very well have messed up) but this should be close:

There is currently NOONE with 6 100%-stars (or 7 in my stats: I counted 1 for Overall as well).

The closest are (of 119 with at least 1 ... or 104 if you exclude Overall):
The number after each heading is their rank in that list.
[CODE]
[SIZE="2"][FONT="Courier New"]
Member Name All TF P1 LL DC EC EF Stars
Sturle Sunde 9 16 6 10 17 3 - 6
ahmerali 4 25 39 5 6 - - 5
linded 3 46 4 3 3 - - 5
TheJudger 7 5 2 18 2 - - 5
GrunwalderGIMP 17 15 15 - 4 - - 4
Torchwood Institute 26 24 21 - 11 - - 4
unconnected 24 - 25 25 - 5 - 4[/FONT][/SIZE]
[/CODE]

If you have the data already, it would be very interesting to know where the 100%, 99%, 98%, 95%, 90% break in the top. For example, being in the first 100 at DC or P-1 puts you in 99% percentile, but being in 50th at ECM only puts you in 80th% percentile. Then xyzzy can think more about "top100 on each category", versus "top custom number for each category".

If you do this table I promise you I let you overpass me in gpu72 DC top :razz:

[QUOTE=Xyzzy;309826]Those are all interesting ideas.

How about "in the top 100" for each category? You get a star for each one?

(Although the 99% club sounded good.)[/QUOTE]

Even for TF? :razz: I think most people are here.

[QUOTE=petrw1;309829]According to my ciphering (and I could very well have messed up) but this should be close:

There is currently NOONE with 6 100%-stars (or 7 in my stats: I counted 1 for Overall as well).

The closest are (of 119 with at least 1 ... or 104 if you exclude Overall):
The number after each heading is their rank in that list.
[CODE]
[SIZE="2"][FONT="Courier New"]
Member Name All TF P1 LL DC EC EF Stars
GrunwalderGIMP 17 15 15 - 4 - - 4
[/FONT][/SIZE]
[/CODE][/QUOTE]

I think you're missing my #16 ranking in ECM.

Graff (a.k.a GrunwalderGIMP)

[QUOTE=Graff;309866]I think you're missing my #16 ranking in ECM.

Graff (a.k.a GrunwalderGIMP)[/QUOTE]

Ranks are only listed if they are in the 100%.

PS forgot to mention. I excluded ANONYMOUS because I had no way of knowing if it was the same person.

[QUOTE=LaurV;309831]If you have the data already, it would be very interesting to know where the 100%, 99%, 98%, 95%, 90% break in the top. For example, being in the first 100 at DC or P-1 puts you in 99% percentile, but being in 50th at ECM only puts you in 80th% percentile. Then xyzzy can think more about "top100 on each category", versus "top custom number for each category".

If you do this table I promise you I let you overpass me in gpu72 DC top :razz:[/QUOTE]

You mean let me stay ahead. Have you checked lately.

I'll see what I can cipher this weekend.

[QUOTE=Xyzzy;309826]Those are all interesting ideas.

How about "in the top 100" for each category? You get a star for each one?

(Although the 99% club sounded good.)[/QUOTE]

I like the idea of Top-100. It's just cool to have a 2-digit rank.
Though some are very easy (ECM, P1) and some (LL) are much harder.

[QUOTE]I like the idea of Top-100. It's just cool to have a 2-digit rank.[/QUOTE]You sound like you are interested in managing this awesome program. Maybe PM us sometime?

:smile: