[QUOTE=Madpoo;465484]Here's a list of the latest exponents that need a triple-check (first two mismatched).[/QUOTE]

Some of these are already assigned or done, here's what remains:

[CODE]
DoubleCheck=57453983,73,1
DoubleCheck=72334631,75,1
DoubleCheck=75857183,75,1
DoubleCheck=77377661,75,1
DoubleCheck=77380019,75,1
DoubleCheck=77569637,75,1
[/CODE]

Here's an updated/new list of triple-checks needed:

[CODE]41809057
41833657
42457213
43241743
43553633
43556251
43558313
43560947
45189191
45493081
45505181
45538319
45607973
45627973
46386617
46661249
52201411
57143657
57453983
69190643
72113243
72334631
74682667
74734069
75320129
75407621
75431747
75857183
77377661
77380019
77546113
77569637
78326977
78448099
80037151
81419599[/CODE]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;465890]Here's an updated/new list of triple-checks needed:
[/QUOTE]

I took:

[CODE]
43241743
74682667
74734069
77546113
81419599
[/CODE]

I grabbed the remaining untaken ones close to the upper exponent limit of an Mlucas FFT length:

57143657
57453983
72113243
72334631
77569637

Aaron, for those of us picking expos from these lists you put out, it would be really handy to enhance the current "Optional exponent range" feature of the manual tests page with an "Exponent list" option: user pastes 1 or more expos into the list-entry field, server assigns all which are currently unreserved. How hard would that be to implement on your end?

Would someone run a triple (quad?) check for [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/default.php?exp_lo=44034871&full=1"]44034871[/URL]? I mismatched an Anon result in which Anon seems to have run back-to-back LLs.

[QUOTE=kladner;465969]Would someone run a triple (quad?) check for [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/default.php?exp_lo=44034871&full=1"]44034871[/URL]? I mismatched an Anon result in which Anon seems to have run back-to-back LLs.[/QUOTE]

The 2 other results were actually just one result. Looks like there's an overlap in the history section where a v4 result was added in, but it was actually already present in the v5 logs.

Yeah, strange as it was, there were in fact some imported v4 logs up to as late as Sep 2011... some of those, if I recall, were cases where people still emailed their results to George, for instance.

Interesting though... maybe I should look for other cases of overlap.

Anyway, that only affects the "history" section... there was only the single recorded result for it, as it should be.

That is comforting to hear. I really don't want another bad result.

Unfortunately it was bad :sad:

[url]https://mersenne.org/M44034871[/url]

[QUOTE=ATH;466216]Unfortunately it was bad :sad:

[URL]https://mersenne.org/M44034871[/URL][/QUOTE]
Thanks for running it. This one is kind of a surprise. I thought I was in a known stable setup. Time for more testing.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;462542]Ahh... you're right about that. To avoid changing the database so it just uses "-Anonymous-" in all cases, I was being too clever by half when I modified the exponent report page. I didn't want to change it in the DB without making sure it wouldn't affect anything else.

Unfortunately I forgot about the report_ll page...

I just tweaked it as well. I need to test it a bit more and make sure I got it swapped out in all the correct spots and then I'll make it live. Good catch.[/QUOTE]

The [URL="https://mersenne.org/report_recent_cleared/"]Recent Cleared[/URL] page also uses ANONYMOUS exclusively, although clicking through the exponent to the PrimeNet Exponent Status page shows that some of them are -Anonymous- instead.

I managed to run my own double check by mistake. I forgot to check them:
[url]http://mersenne.org/M44356541[/url]

If anyone got time at some point to do another run.