[QUOTE=GP2;459295]Quadruple check available at [M]44872229[/M], Madpoo's result is probably the good one.[/QUOTE]

Queued.

[QUOTE=GP2;459295]Quadruple check available at [M]44872229[/M], Madpoo's result is probably the good one.[/QUOTE]
[STRIKE]Taken and queued.[/STRIKE] Oops. Too slow! :smile:

One more quad check involving Madpoo, but it's a big one:

DoubleCheck=[M]78220829[/M],75,1

[QUOTE=GP2;459308]One more quad check involving Madpoo, but it's a big one:

DoubleCheck=[M]78220829[/M],75,1[/QUOTE]

Queued.

Here's one I just turned in a result for that needs a quad check:

[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M48148157"]M48148157[/URL]

[QUOTE=Madpoo;459472]Here's one I just turned in a result for that needs a quad check:

[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M48148157"]M48148157[/URL][/QUOTE]

Queued

Another Madpoo quad check:

DoubleCheck=[M]75706511[/M],75,1

These double-checks are also available from the same user/computer:

DoubleCheck=[M]75684407[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]75734119[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]75812557[/M],75,1

DoubleCheck=[M]78440003[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]78474337[/M],75,1
DoubleCheck=[M]78591883[/M],75,1

New one needing a quad check
 

I just finished up this little gem that now needs a quad check:
[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M52422059"]https://www.mersenne.org/M52422059[/URL]

Always fun to find those. :smile:

[QUOTE=Madpoo;459953]I just finished up this little gem that now needs a quad check:
[URL="https://www.mersenne.org/M52422059"]https://www.mersenne.org/M52422059[/URL]

Always fun to find those. :smile:[/QUOTE]

Queued.

The exponent [M]75976063[/M] is a curious case.

The first-time check is probably bad, given the track record of the machine that did it and the fact that it has a scary looking error code.

A double check is 99.9% complete, but it's been stuck there for a long time, maybe even a couple of weeks or more. Yet it checks in and updates daily.

If it were a smaller exponent I'd poach it without thinking twice, since a triple check will likely be needed no matter what. But I have a large backlog to work through, so I'll pass.

[QUOTE=GP2;460646]The exponent [M]75976063[/M] is a curious case.

The first-time check is probably bad, given the track record of the machine that did it and the fact that it has a scary looking error code.

A double check is 99.9% complete, but it's been stuck there for a long time, maybe even a couple of weeks or more. Yet it checks in and updates daily.

If it were a smaller exponent I'd poach it without thinking twice, since a triple check will likely be needed no matter what. But I have a large backlog to work through, so I'll pass.[/QUOTE]

I can tell you exactly how long it's been stuck at 99.9% since I'm tracking the daily progress of assignments... it went from 97.7 to 99.9 between May 3rd and May 4th, and it's been stuck there now for the past month.

Up until then it had been averaging 5-6% progress per day... something definitely happened to it. It would be pretty weird if they stopped it at 99.9% and then moved some other work ahead of it in the queue.

Odds are they need to restart the program and maybe it would finish? Just a guess. We'll find out eventually...