![]() |
[QUOTE=S485122;455847]I had your first mismatch on a slower machine; I transferred it to another that should finish it round 2017-03-31 16:00 UTC.
Jacob[/QUOTE] Much appreciated :smile: I wasn't so fussed with just the one mismatch, I'm plenty patient, but with two at the same time... that has me rather more worried for the quality of my machine :no: |
please triple check 45465307
same machine that has previously had a bad and a suspect result. I may have to retire this machine from the program. :-( |
[QUOTE=stebbo;455893]please triple check 45465307[/QUOTE]
Looks like Madpoo is already on it. The machine that did the first test seems to have a less than perfect record, so there's hope. |
[QUOTE=Dubslow;455855]Much appreciated :smile: I wasn't so fussed with just the one mismatch, I'm plenty patient, but with two at the same time... that has me rather more worried for the quality of my machine :no:[/QUOTE]
Out results matched on [url=https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=39655643&full=1]39655643[/url]. Jacob |
[QUOTE=S485122;455908]Out results matched on [url=https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=39655643&full=1]39655643[/url].
Jacob[/QUOTE] Ah, that's a relief. I guess I just got lucky to get two bad-first-tests at the same time :smile: Thanks for switching to a faster machine for me. |
[QUOTE=Dubslow;455947]...
Thanks for switching to a faster machine for me.[/QUOTE]I had to : the new version of prime95 has another way of using the "RollingAverage" compared to previous versions. As a consequence the slower machine was given too many work units with the cat 0 as last one ! Jacob |
[QUOTE=GP2;455751]MadPoo grabs a lot of double-check assignments. If exponents are not urgent he lets them sit for a while until it's their turn in the queue, however he routinely does them to 0.1% first, presumably because that immunizes them from the weird sporadic "spontaneous unreserving" bug.[/QUOTE]
I don't grab more than I can complete in ~ 20 days or so. I used to grab enough for 60 days at a time to keep me from micro-managing the worktodo files as much but then I had some exponents expiring because I do all my assignments manually and if I didn't report at least some update, they were expiring on me too soon. :smile: I guess I don't really have that problem now since I'm not getting as much in advance, but yeah, I report it as being started anyway just to be sure. On the odd chance I get a cat 0 assignment (just happened a couple days ago) I move it to the front of the queue. Right now I queue them up in the order I assign them, but if there's an interesting one (a quad check, or if I'm looking at one of those false positives) I bump it to the top. |
I've been playing with undervolting. Could someone kindly quickly triple check [url=https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=79819147&full=1]M79819147[/url] please?
|
[QUOTE=Mark Rose;456268]I've been playing with undervolting. Could someone kindly quickly triple check [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=79819147&full=1"]M79819147[/URL] please?[/QUOTE]
Registered. ETA 4 days 10 hours. |
[QUOTE=kladner;456288]Registered. ETA 4 days 10 hours.[/QUOTE]
Thank you! |
[QUOTE=Mark Rose;456268]I've been playing with undervolting. Could someone kindly quickly triple check [URL="https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=79819147&full=1"]M79819147[/URL] please?[/QUOTE]
My result matched yours. :smile: |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:55. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.