[QUOTE=ric;452459]Let's sort it out... [/QUOTE]

LOL... [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/M42249167"]42249167[/URL]

FWIW, I'd have put my bet on Mark's result, amongst those.

[QUOTE=ric;452481]LOL... [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/M42249167"]42249167[/URL]

FWIW, I'd have put my bet on Mark's result, amongst those.[/QUOTE]
I certainly look forward to a definitive answer, i.e. a match with one of the results already posted.

[QUOTE=ric;452481]LOL... [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/M42249167"]42249167[/URL]

FWIW, I'd have put my bet on Mark's result, amongst those.[/QUOTE]

That has to be one of the most unlikely things to have happened in the history of PrimeNet...

[QUOTE=ric;452459]Let's sort it out... (or Madpoo will have a quintuple check soon)[/QUOTE]
Are you running the quadruple check? If no one is, I will do so.

[QUOTE=Jayder;452500]Are you running the quadruple check? If no one is, I will do so.[/QUOTE]

I'm fine with the factor, thanks: be my guest :-)

Factored, but I still want to know if my LL result is bad.

I ran 3 passes of memtest86+ last night and no errors were found (over 16 hours).

I'm really not confident in this machine. I have one more exponent that could use TC:

DoubleCheck=[url=http://www.mersenne.org/M42291517]42291517[/url],72,1

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;452521]I'm really not confident in this machine. I have one more exponent that could use TC:

DoubleCheck=[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/M42291517"]42291517[/URL],72,1[/QUOTE]
I'll queue it. I think my setup has stabilized following a doubtful period after a new build. It has turned in a match since [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/M42249167"]4224916.[/URL]
Registered.

[QUOTE=ric;452481]LOL... [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/M42249167"]42249167[/URL]

FWIW, I'd have put my bet on Mark's result, amongst those.[/QUOTE]
haha you guys, that is really funny ! :w00t:
Congrats for factor, i.e. saving Madpoo's time :razz:

My quadruple check of M42249167 resulted in a residue that matches the one from the first LL test. I have tried reporting it in the manual testing page, but it won't take it. What do I do?

[QUOTE=Jayder;452592]My quadruple check of M42249167 resulted in a residue that matches the one from the first LL test. I have tried reporting it in the manual testing page, but it won't take it. What do I do?[/QUOTE]
So Mark and I were both wrong. :picard:
The report may not be accepted because a factor has been found. Regardless, your effort is greatly appreciated. Triple checks serve to prove the (in)accuracy of equipment as well as determining prime status. Thanks for making the run. You deserve the credit I got. :tu: