[QUOTE=Madpoo;406177]Oh, maybe not. I must be thinking of the report to show *results* by user, but can't do it for assignments. Oh well.

Here's the list of all the 71+ assignments I have:[/QUOTE]

Many of these are already TF'ed appropriately. The remainder will take an additional day.

[QUOTE=Madpoo;406179]If you find any factors, can you also report them in this thread so I don't miss it? Then I can remove any of those from my worktodo files.

Thanks for that. It takes ~ 13 hours to do a 34M exponent on a 10-core chip, so even finding factors for two of the smallest in the list would be a net gain. And not all my systems are dual 10-core beasties either, so that's just a conversation starter there... if you found a factor for a 50M+ exponent that I had running on a 6-core CPU it'd save me about a week, for instance.

(in truth I tend to put the larger exponents on the higher-cored chips)[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I'll monitor on occasion over the next two days. Everything should be done in under 48 hours.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;406171]PrimeNet is not letting me manually reserve it for whatever reason though.[/QUOTE]

So you don't "step on any toes"... The trick on getting such an assignment is to put the candidate's factor line into a Prime95/mprime instance's worktodo.txt file (e.g. "Factor=47223833,73,74"), and then have the instance communicate with Primenet (e.g. "./mprime -c").

If the candidate is not already assigned to someone else, the line should change to be "Factor=[AID],47223833,73,74". If it is already assigned, it will change to have [AID] == "N/A".

[QUOTE=chalsall;406184]So you don't "step on any toes"... The trick on getting such an assignment is to put the candidate's factor line into a Prime95/mprime instance's worktodo.txt file (e.g. "Factor=47223833,73,74"), and then have the instance communicate with Primenet (e.g. "./mprime -c").

If the candidate is not already assigned to someone else, the line should change to be "Factor=[AID],47223833,73,74". If it is already assigned, it will change to have [AID] == "N/A".[/QUOTE]

Ahh, neat. That worked. It's now assigned to me as a double check. :)

Edit: Should be done in 6 days.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;406185]Ahh, neat. That worked. It's now assigned to me as a double check. :)

Edit: Should be done in 6 days.[/QUOTE]

Cool... you da man.

I have a new little idea rattling around in my brain, like a BB in a boxcar...

I don't know how feasible this is from a DB perspective, but the thought was that for each exponent that's only been tested once, do a query that shows that exponent along with a count of "Bad Results" and "Good Results" for the computer that tested it.

I'm trying this out on 6 exponents where the # of bad results was larger than the good results, and it was a non-zero error code (but not enough to trigger it being marked as suspect). So that should be interesting...

But if we could make a list like that available widely, could be fun.

Last of the original self-verified triple-checks... done!
 

Ugh... that was a slog. 4 months on this one exponent. You can't imagine how glad I am it matched. :smile:
[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/M383838383"]M383838383[/URL]

Okay, now I asked for assignments here and all are taken already by one person :D

But thats okay, I just want them to be done, I don't mind who is gonna do that.

Then I will just continue my (maybe stupid) work to bring everything above 100k to 62 bits.

[QUOTE=manfred4;406191]Okay, now I asked for assignments here and all are taken already by one person :D

But thats okay, I just want them to be done, I don't mind who is gonna do that.

Then I will just continue my (maybe stupid) work to bring everything above 100k to 62 bits.[/QUOTE]

You could do these... I just picked up these 6 additional ones:
[CODE]Exponent CurrentTF
46416751 69
37041211 71
36908527 71
36705943 71
35480609 71
40582921 72[/CODE]

Only 46416751 needs more TF, the rest is fine already. Will be done very soon.

How many GHz-d/day can you do, manfred4?

I'll split some off so we finish the divided work at approximately the same time, if you like.

I will do 300 GHzd per day, if you split it even for time that would be great!