[QUOTE=Mark Rose;405387]I finished my work a few days ago. I don't know why it's still in the list :)[/QUOTE]

Hmm... you might check and make sure you checked in your results for:
27045749
27107077
27161191

I just looked at those and still only saw the self-verified runs for those. Let me know if they were submitted and just didn't make it in for some reason?

[QUOTE=Madpoo;405410]Hmm... you might check and make sure you checked in your results for:
27045749
27107077
27161191

I just looked at those and still only saw the self-verified runs for those. Let me know if they were submitted and just didn't make it in for some reason?[/QUOTE]

I guess I missed submitted the very first batch of completed ones. Oops. Anyway, they all match.

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;405413]I guess I missed submitted the very first batch of completed ones. Oops. Anyway, they all match.[/QUOTE]

Thanks, I see those results now. Very cool.

It feels good to be in the home stretch. I juggled a few workers around to try and get most of them done tomorrow. There'll be a few that came in lately in the 70M range that will take another day or two, but oh well. There'll always be a few more showing up I guess.

Given that I did find one instance of the self-verified result being incorrect (and maybe that was a custom build that just generated goofy residues) I think it's worthwhile to keep on top of these and try to clear them as new ones show up.

Now that a pretty major (as in HUGE) backlog of them has been cleared out it shouldn't be too bad. As we progressed, I was generating new lists and I only saw maybe 2-3 new ones show up per week. And since George added code to prevent double check assignments from going to the same user who did the first check, it should be even less now. I think that was done back in April or something. Sometimes users just run two checks at once on different boxes... no double-check assignment. Oh well... nothing to do except encourage people to let someone else do that, I guess?

I'll volunteer to run double-checks if anyone thinks they have a flaky box and need independent checks...within reason of course. :smile:

Hello. Sorry if this isn't the right place but I was wondering if someone could re check [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/M40250641"]M40250641[/URL]. It's concerning since an anonymous user seemed to have check in matching results for the first time LL. I also switched the worktodo from "AdvancedTest=40250641" to "DoubleCheck=...." generated on the assignments page a few % in.

I'm running some self checks on a new machine that I have much more confidence in. The old machine was a laptop what was overheating under load (a recent change of thermal paste reduced load temps by ~15°C).

[QUOTE=XZT;405451]Hello. Sorry if this isn't the right place but I was wondering if someone could re check [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/M40250641"]M40250641[/URL]. It's concerning since an anonymous user seemed to have check in matching results for the first time LL. I also switched the worktodo from "AdvancedTest=40250641" to "DoubleCheck=...." generated on the assignments page a few % in.

I'm running some self checks on a new machine that I have much more confidence in. The old machine was a laptop what was overheating under load (a recent change of thermal paste reduced load temps by ~15°C).[/QUOTE]

As it happens, I noticed that new self-verified exponent yesterday and started my own check on it. It has 8 hours to go. :smile:

For wombatman and petrw1 ... need help finishing up?
 

Now that I'm just about done here (I've already got several systems done with these triple-checks, doing other regular double-checks now) would either of you (wombatman and petrw1) want help finishing up the rest of the ranges you picked out?

Especially once my 8- and 10-core dual proc systems finish up in the next few hours, I can add in whatever you guys wanted to get off your plate and hopefully have it all done and over with in short order.

Otherwise I'll just load 'em up with other stuff, no worries.

Here's the latest list... short enough now to just paste in here:
[CODE]---- start DC requested by wombatman
DoubleCheck=19717543,69,1
DoubleCheck=19728979,69,1
DoubleCheck=19786813,69,1
DoubleCheck=19789381,69,1
DoubleCheck=19802033,69,1
DoubleCheck=19877959,69,1
DoubleCheck=19884833,69,1
DoubleCheck=19916933,69,1
DoubleCheck=19924139,69,1
DoubleCheck=19944763,69,1
DoubleCheck=19948349,69,1
DoubleCheck=19955653,69,1
DoubleCheck=19977641,69,1
DoubleCheck=19977883,69,1
DoubleCheck=19990783,69,1
DoubleCheck=19992317,69,1
---- end DC requested by wombatman
---- start DC requested by petrw1
DoubleCheck=28056661,71,1
DoubleCheck=28100893,71,1
DoubleCheck=28101811,71,1
DoubleCheck=28108229,71,1
DoubleCheck=28127987,71,1
DoubleCheck=28130363,71,1
DoubleCheck=28223827,71,1
DoubleCheck=28228363,71,1
DoubleCheck=28259303,71,1
DoubleCheck=28262029,71,1
DoubleCheck=28269509,71,1
DoubleCheck=28293673,71,1
DoubleCheck=28396163,71,1
DoubleCheck=28405591,71,1
DoubleCheck=28422829,71,1
DoubleCheck=28447213,71,1
DoubleCheck=28485481,71,1
---- end DC requested by petrw1
---- start DC requested by madpoo
DoubleCheck=32019353,72,1
DoubleCheck=32309281,72,1
DoubleCheck=32399207,72,1
DoubleCheck=32572817,72,1
DoubleCheck=32747503,72,1
DoubleCheck=32936149,72,1
DoubleCheck=32994967,72,1
DoubleCheck=34224103,72,1
DoubleCheck=34254811,72,1
DoubleCheck=36330247,71,1
DoubleCheck=40250641,72,1
*DoubleCheck=58496237,75,1
DoubleCheck=73823033,75,1
DoubleCheck=73830551,75,1
DoubleCheck=74281553,73,1
DoubleCheck=383838383,83,1
---- end DC requested by madpoo
[/CODE]

I'll see where I'm at tonight. I'd be fine with you finishing up my last few since you could probably crank them faster than me (I've been using CUDALucas).

Mine will take about 1 more month....

Because of a strange distribution I can send you a list tonight when I get home of which are the longest from completion

[QUOTE=XZT;405451]Hello. Sorry if this isn't the right place but I was wondering if someone could re check [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/M40250641"]M40250641[/URL]. It's concerning since an anonymous user seemed to have check in matching results for the first time LL. I also switched the worktodo from "AdvancedTest=40250641" to "DoubleCheck=...." generated on the assignments page a few % in.

I'm running some self checks on a new machine that I have much more confidence in. The old machine was a laptop what was overheating under load (a recent change of thermal paste reduced load temps by ~15°C).[/QUOTE]

Here you go:
[URL="http://www.mersenne.org/M40250641"]M40250641[/URL]

[QUOTE=petrw1;405498]Mine will take about 1 more month....

Because of a strange distribution I can send you a list tonight when I get home of which are the longest from completion[/QUOTE]

I can PM you my email address if you wanted to zip up your save files for any you wanted me to take over. Sounds like you might be running all of yours simultaneously, so even if some are just a few percent along, every bit helps. :smile:

[QUOTE=wombatman;405496]I'll see where I'm at tonight. I'd be fine with you finishing up my last few since you could probably crank them faster than me (I've been using CUDALucas).[/QUOTE]

Sure, just give me the list of which ones you'd like me to snag.

And I do appreciate all the help. Between everyone else who was pitching in, I think we finished this like a month or two earlier than if I'd tried to bite off this huge task myself. It was a little daunting... I'm looking at the original list of 2300+ exponents, and it's cool we're near the finish line, approx 4 months later.