mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Soap Box (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Americanophobia (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=16974)

xilman 2012-09-27 06:49

The Empire Strikes Back
 
[url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19670686[/url]

Dubslow 2012-09-27 06:57

[QUOTE=xilman;312904][url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19670686[/url][/QUOTE]

Gingers are the brunt of many jokes -- I'm not sure I'd call it prejudice, but I definitely don't think of gingerbread (or anything warm/comforting) when I hear the word.

retina 2012-09-27 07:09

I sincerely hope that the Imperial measurement system doesn't become the world standard. It is already crazy enough to put up with seconds, minutes, hours and months without having to add in inches, feet, yards, chains, miles, furlongs, gallons, pounds, ounces etc. But I like the dollars, I will always accept more of those.

davieddy 2012-10-02 14:13

[QUOTE=retina;312906]I sincerely hope that the Imperial measurement system doesn't become the world standard. It is already crazy enough to put up with seconds, minutes, hours and months without having to add in inches, feet, yards, chains, miles, furlongs, gallons, pounds, ounces etc. But I like the dollars, I will always accept more of those.[/QUOTE]
How about Rods, Pole or Perches?

Make mine a pint:smile:

Uncwilly 2012-10-03 00:20

pottles, ells, nails, squares, gills, giggers....

davar55 2012-10-05 20:17

[QUOTE=retina;312906]I sincerely hope that the Imperial measurement system doesn't become the world standard. It is already crazy enough to put up with seconds, minutes, hours and months without having to add in inches, feet, yards, chains, miles, furlongs, gallons, pounds, ounces etc. But I like the dollars, I will always accept more of those.[/QUOTE]

Makes cents to me.

garo 2012-10-12 17:08

And now the NYT picks up the theme.

[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/11/fashion/americans-are-barmy-over-britishisms.html[/url]

only_human 2012-10-12 17:40

[QUOTE=garo;314412]And now the NYT picks up the theme.

[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/11/fashion/americans-are-barmy-over-britishisms.html[/url][/QUOTE]I didn't know "twee."

I disagree with the article about any US usage of "chat up" that varies from the British meaning of "flirting" except perhaps by conveying less serious intent. I suppose that someone might try using it for a meaning of butter up, but it would be odd. I never have heard it used for a meaning of simply "talk to."

davieddy 2012-10-14 11:07

[QUOTE=only_human;314413]
I disagree with the article about any US usage of "chat up" that varies from the British meaning of "flirting" except perhaps by conveying less serious intent.[/QUOTE]

I would say that "chatting up" implies some intention of "pulling" whereas "flirting" is just being friendly.

You'll have to ask the late Sir Jimmy Saville about it.

David

xilman 2012-10-17 14:04

[QUOTE=xilman;312904][url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19670686[/url][/QUOTE]Some more: [url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19929249[/url]

Most of them fed back to the Beeb by Americans living in the US.

Dubslow 2012-10-18 00:09

[QUOTE=xilman;314965]Some more: [url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19929249[/url]

Most of them fed back to the Beeb by Americans living in the US.[/QUOTE]
"pop over" I wouldn't really call a Britishism, though it is less popular than (e.g.) "swing by".


All times are UTC. The time now is 11:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.