![]() |
[QUOTE=cmd;452705][url]http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000900921624[/url]
is P not C[/QUOTE] [CODE]? isprime(111111111111111111111111111111111111061) 1 [/CODE] |
°|<
2 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=paulunderwood;452706][CODE]? isprime(111111111111111111111111111111111111061)
1 [/CODE][/QUOTE] thx |
[QUOTE=cmd;452705][url]http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000900921624[/url]
[/QUOTE] fdb now works again, but the link id=1100000000900921624 is still wrong "status C" .. erase .. |
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=cmd;452810]fdb now works again,
.. mo__re .. [/QUOTE] [code] [QUOTE=cmd;452810]fdb now works again, but in image attachments, find .. mo__re .. mo_er_dup#keyid .. [/QUOTE] [/code] |
The core on "Factoring numbers <70 digits" frequently hangs (last event >1 hour), and there's a large number of small composites without known factors (<30 digits).
Don't think this is normal behavior. Edit: Can someone double check if the following four 39-digit numbers labelled "C" are actually prime? 111111111111111111111111111111111111061 111111111111111111111111111111111111061 111111111111111111111111111111111110957 111111111111111111111111111111111110947 |
[QUOTE=GeoffreyY;453016]The core on "Factoring numbers <70 digits" frequently hangs (last event >1 hour), and there's a large number of small composites without known factors (<30 digits).
Don't think this is normal behavior. Edit: Can someone double check if the following four 39-digit numbers labelled "C" are actually prime? 111111111111111111111111111111111111061 111111111111111111111111111111111111061 111111111111111111111111111111111110957 111111111111111111111111111111111110947[/QUOTE] There are only three distinct numbers here, and they are all prime. |
I just started doing some Primo certificates in the 2400d range and seem to be getting a lot of composites from the PRP listing. Is this indicative of a problem associated with the above mentioned C vs. P issues, or is it normal?
|
There is also a C79 in the list of composite numbers without known factors that is prime:
(10^79-181)%(10^79-1)/9 Appears to be more of cmd's handiwork..... |
2 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=richs;453061]There is also a C79 in the list of composite numbers without known factors that is prime:
(10^79-181)[B][B]%[/B][/B](10^79-1)/9 Appears to be more of cmd's hand_[COLOR="DarkOrange"][i][/COLOR]_work.. [/QUOTE] id .. times [COLOR="Red"] [__][/COLOR] [ ] [COLOR="Green"][__] [/COLOR] |
There are primes that return composite in factordb, such as:
4*143##+1 4*173##+1 4*186##+1 4*180##-1 4*228##-1 4*268##-1 4*301##-1 Also, there are composites that return prime in factordb, such as: 2^17058*210681-1 (equals (2^8529*459-1) * (2^8529*459+1)) 2^22910*837225-1 (equals (2^11455*915-1) * (2^11455*915+1)) Besides, PRP 108^398*109+1 should be easy to prove by N-1. But factordb thinks 108^398*109 is 2*5*109 so N-1 is only 0.259% factored, I think that there are the same bug to some other numbers. |
factordb still thinks that these two are 82 digit composites:
9699691 (id 1100000000912669113) 223092871 (id 1100000000912669114) |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 06:20. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.