[QUOTE=LaurV;321494]Yuck! :yucky:
Only my grandma is missing from that folder.[/QUOTE]

Look for the new naming scheme. All files begin with p95v279.

[QUOTE=Prime95;321498]Look for the new naming scheme. All files begin with p95v279.[/QUOTE]
We knew that. It was just a scream about the mess in the folder, without any intention to cloud the sky. We already installed it and it runs with no errors since we posted, 4 cores on a 50M expo. We still wait for the errors to come, just in case they are lost somewhere in the computer's intestines, but for now we would be tempted to say: Good job! What the error was? (not that I would understand, this is more a rhetorical question :razz:). This part for sure will make some laptop owners very happy:

[QUOTE=undoc.txt]WINDOWS ONLY: You can have prime95 pause when the battery level gets low.
This will allow you to charge the battery faster. Add the line
BatteryPercent=n
to prime.txt, where n is a number from 0 to 100. The default value is zero.
[/QUOTE]

[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/gimps/[/url]

We have the option of adding text to the header. Perhaps a list of file descriptions or maybe a list of the most common files?

[QUOTE=Xyzzy;321509][url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/gimps/[/url]

We have the option of adding text to the header. Perhaps a list of file descriptions or maybe a list of the most common files?[/QUOTE]

Here's a shocking new concept: Subfolders! :shock:

[QUOTE=axn;321512]Here's a shocking new concept: Subfolders! :shock:[/QUOTE]
That is what I suggested. There is already a [sub]folder inside, so it would be no problem to create more, like [older_versions\[windows,linux,mac,sources],current[[windows,linux,mac,sources]]. I can do it in few seconds with total commander, but I have no rights (I don't want this to sound as a request, but as a proof of how easy it is :razz:)

We mirror the official site so that the forum's mirror can be used in rotation with the official mirror. (Does that make sense?)

In other words, changes to the actual structure are up to George.

That said, a note at the top might be helpful. If someone wrote one and posted it here we would see to it that it got included in the header.

:mike:

New message to me....
 

[CODE][Main thread Dec 13 08:21] Mersenne number primality test program version 27.7
[Main thread Dec 13 08:21] Optimizing for CPU architecture: Core i3/i5/i7, L2 cache size: 256 KB, L3 cache size: 3 MB
[Main thread Dec 13 08:21] Unable to detect which logical CPUs are hyperthreaded.
[Main thread Dec 13 08:21] Assuming logical CPUs 1 and 2, 3 and 4, etc. are each from one physical CPU core.
[Main thread Dec 13 08:21] To the best of my knowledge this assumption is only valid for Microsoft Windows.
[Main thread Dec 13 08:21] To override this assumption, see AffinityScramble2 in undoc.txt.
[Main thread Dec 13 08:21] Starting workers.[/CODE]

Every other time before this that it started up it said Logical cores 1 and 2 make 1 physical core and 3 and 4 makes up the other.

However, the above assumption did not affect the performance. Makes sense since there really are only 2 physical cores.

That happens for me maybe every 1 of 10 starts.
If I understood correctly, it runs a quick timing test on a few threads and compares performance to a single thread: if the second thread approximately doubles throughput then the second thread is running on a "real" core. If performance is only marginally different then it's a "fake" (hyperthreaded) core. If the results don't fall within the result margins of either scenario then you get the above error. This can happen depending on what else is running on the CPU at the time Prime95 starts up.

My test of 29810063 with the huge round-off errors completely successfully. No errors are occurring on the next exponent that worker is running.

[QUOTE=LaurV;321505]Good job! What the error was?[/QUOTE]

As always, programmer error. I did a memcpy from MAXERR (a double) rather than the correct YMM_MAXERR (4 doubles). Thus, 3 uninitialized doubles were copied.

[quote=axn]Here's a shocking new concept: Subfolders![/quote]

I'll leave the mess as is. There are a number of links around the web to these binaries. I suppose I could move all the v24 and earlier binaries to a subfolder. Anyone using those old links is probably better off getting a "not found" error.

[QUOTE=Prime95;321678]As always, programmer error. I did a memcpy from MAXERR (a double) rather than the correct YMM_MAXERR (4 doubles). Thus, 3 uninitialized doubles were copied.
[/QUOTE]

In other words no errors in tests were created in this. It was just the error reporting.