[QUOTE=LaurV;294756]This could only make sense for TF, and not too much sense for P-1 or ECM. There is no factor in that list which was found by TF. We could have it sorted in any order we like, if the effort is not big to implement it. But I think the effort is high for the benefit we get.[/QUOTE]

I never said it would be useful, just cool :razz::smile:

New transition point for DCTF...
 

Just so everyone knows, based on the analysis by James, and bcp19 [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpost.php?p=294841&postcount=1742"]here[/URL], I have changed the DC transition from 69 to 70 bits from 29.69M to 32M.

All the reports, and of course the assignment page, have been updated accordingly.

Also, while I'm "transmitting", bcp19 asked for his individual factoring statistics. I should have thought of doing that myself for everyone long ago; took three minutes. Everyone now has a new link under their "My Account" menu -- "[URL="http://www.gpu72.com/account/factoring_cost/"]Individual Factoring Cost[/URL]".

Please let me know if anyone would like this data available to them in CSV format.

[QUOTE=chalsall;294858]"[URL="http://www.gpu72.com/account/factoring_cost/"]Individual Factoring Cost[/URL]"[/QUOTE]Would it be easy to add a comparison to the total/average numbers for all users, so I can see how my cost-per-factor compares to overall?

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;294859]Would it be easy to add a comparison to the total/average numbers for all users, so I can see how my cost-per-factor compares to overall?[/QUOTE]

Not exactly easy, but yes, that's in the works.

Also, I'm going to go ahead and do the CSV version of this, and will expose all useful data, including that which can't easily be made to fit on a web page. For each 1M range and bit level, I'll expose TF attempts, GHzDays Done, Factors Found, GHzDays Saved, and Expected Factors.

With a spreadsheet (or programming language of one's choice), the Cost per Factor Found and Factor Found Percentage can be easily be derived from the above fields.

[QUOTE=chalsall;294858]Everyone now has a new link under their "My Account" menu -- "[URL="http://www.gpu72.com/account/factoring_cost/"]Individual Factoring Cost[/URL]".[/QUOTE]

P1?

[QUOTE=petrw1;294861]P1?[/QUOTE]

[URL="http://www.gpu72.com/account/factoring_cost/p-1/"]P-1.[/URL]

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;294859]Would it be easy to add a comparison to the total/average numbers for all users, so I can see how my cost-per-factor compares to overall?[/QUOTE]

Towards this functionality, I've built a weighted linear regression of all our factoring attempts vs. factoring successes across all the ranges we've worked, and all the bit levels we've worked to.

To make sure the regression was "sane", I [URL="http://www.gpu72.com/reports/factor_percentage/graph/"]plotted the results[/URL]. This is updated in real-time, and is available as a sub-menu of the "Factor Found Percentages" menu.

Please note that at the moment, the percentage found values are being under-reported for several ranges and bit-levels for reasons I won't bore you with. But hopefully this will correct itself soon (hint, hint to the person responsible... :wink:).

(And, yes... A P-1 version of this will be available in the near future.)

I'm currently held from home by work, so my GPU-laptop can't run (not taking it with me on the plane, and not letting it run hot at home without supervision - hot hot hot).
This situation should improve over then next 2 weeks.

Chris: that might have an impact on my current assignments...

[QUOTE=sonjohan;295193]Chris: that might have an impact on my current assignments...[/QUOTE]

No problem. I've marked all of your assignments as "Extended" so they won't be auto-expired.

Have a good and safe trip!

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;290960]I'm sure that's a tidbit of interesting for many people -- could you put that on the user stats page (expected vs found factors; by bit range and overall)?

Of course, if you do that there's bound to be somebody complaining that they're missing some factors because they're below average.[/QUOTE]

OK, it's taken some time, but this has now been implemented for Trial Factoring in both meta ranges (DC and LL), based on the weighted linear regression across our entire data set. The P-1 analysis is still to be implemented.

This information is currently shown on the Individual Stats page. I'll place it on the "Workers' Overall Progress" page once I have the P-1 implemented (needed for the default aggregate display).

Note that the statistics will be constantly adjusted as additional candidates are processed and the WLR gets additional data to fit to.

Another Wow! This is really cool.
It confirms an impression that my brief period of DCTF yielded a remarkable number of factors. I'm barely under the expected for LLTF.