Now that the only assignments available are to take things from 71-72 I suspect that we will need a lot more P-1 power soon...

I suspect we'll see quite a few more 69 expos once the server is back up.

Tweeks to Individual Workers' Graphs...
 

Since PrimeNet was having issues today, I wasn't able to finish the clean-up work I had started yesterday.

So, I spent a little bit of time experimenting with my suggestion of spreading the work received by those who return a large batch of results which were really done over a number of previous days. I know at least one person doesn't like the idea, but I think it's worthwhile.

For examples, [URL="http://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker/829a683f5d991e17d4cca0453117d491/"]Dubslow's[/URL] and [URL="http://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker/89edb735f68ff3faa688634ac776d5f8/"]Carsten's[/URL] graphs are now actually readable. As in, their Y axis is now not unreasonably compressed.

Note that I am not actually destroying data -- this is a new field in the table which has an "Adjusted" return date. And the Dubslow's and Carsten's adjustments were done by hand to test the idea and develop an algorithm. This will be automated if it's agree this has more upside than down.

Anyone want to be excluded from having their charts adjusted in this way?

I like it, but some others may want to compare the old and new side by side. (Remembering my own graph previously, I can say without direct comparison that this is a major improvement.)


(In case you're wondering about the DCTF I'm doing for all the hubub I made, I'm just trying to get each individual work type rank above the overall rank :razz::smile:)

[QUOTE=Dubslow;290765]I like it, but some others may want to compare the old and new side by side. (Remembering my own graph previously, I can say without direct comparison that this is a major improvement.)[/QUOTE]

Well, as a comparison, I'm attaching your graph without the Adjustment function....

And here is Carsten's....

[QUOTE=KyleAskine;290756]Now that the only assignments available are to take things from 71-72 I suspect that we will need a lot more P-1 power soon...[/QUOTE]

I'm going to move a few more cores to P-1 once I get done with my current batch of TF. It won't help much, but hopefully an extra P-1 or two a day.

Wait, you mean shift a GPU to CUDALucas? :confused: (If a CPU is doing TF, that means mfatkc?)

[QUOTE=Dubslow;290785]Wait, you mean shift a GPU to CUDALucas? :confused: (If a CPU is doing TF, that means mfatkc?)[/QUOTE]

No, right now my 6-core CPU is running TF through a 580. It takes a core per instance, so I figured I could stop TFing on a couple cores and start another P-1 on the system.

So you mean you had 6 instances on one 580?

[QUOTE=flashjh;290787]No, right now my 6-core CPU is running TF through a 580.[/QUOTE]That seems a lot. I can feed a 570 with only 2 cores of a 3930K, leaving 4 cores left for P-1... what is your 6-core CPU?