![]() |
No time...
Hey everyone.
Sorry for any outstanding issues. I can't (yet) say why, but I have *zero* cycles for the next 48 hours. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;568520]Hey everyone.
Sorry for any outstanding issues. I can't (yet) say why, but I have *zero* cycles for the next 48 hours.[/QUOTE] Primenet accepted all of my reruns, and the automatic work fetch is working again. :smile: |
[QUOTE=LaurV;568437][URL="https://mariadb.org/about/"]Nope.[/URL]
. P.S. I will tell on you, to your wife! :razz: .[/QUOTE] Never seen a Maria being relational. Maria has been the most popular female name in Portugal for last 16 years. All my aunties are Maria, mother too, Maria something. Lol apologies for the thread hijack. |
Quite the same in Ro, albeit not in newer generations, but I have plenty of them in the family too, in the ancestry and old relatives. Mother and grandma were both Maria.
|
I have a couple assignments at GPU72 that GPU72 hasn't detected that I've finished, from last year.
Anyway, I'm not particularly concerned about that, but there may be some other exponents that failed to update around mid December. An example: [url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/default.php?exp_lo=103452421&full=1[/url] |
[QUOTE=Mark Rose;568698]I have a couple assignments at GPU72 that GPU72 hasn't detected that I've finished, from last year.
Anyway, I'm not particularly concerned about that, but there may be some other exponents that failed to update around mid December. An example: [url]https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/default.php?exp_lo=103452421&full=1[/url][/QUOTE] It looks like it skipped the 74th bit level. I've been noticing the same problem with some GPU-72 assignments recently. At first, I thought I messed up somehow, but now I'm not sure. |
I have four results from yesterday and today stuck as well.
no factor for M103618351 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.21 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M103623307 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.21 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M103625663 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.21 barrett76_mul32_gs] no factor for M103625887 from 2^74 to 2^75 [mfaktc 0.21 barrett76_mul32_gs] |
Most recently, GPU-72 gave me [M]116345897[/M] and skipped the 73 to 74. I went back and ran it, and now primenet shows "no factors below 74" even though it is factored to 76.
[Sorry for the double post, I had to dig for that exponent, thanks.] |
[QUOTE=Runtime Error;568704]Most recently, GPU-72 gave me [M]116345897[/M] and skipped the 73 to 74. I went back and ran it, and now primenet shows "no factors below 74" even though it is factored to 76.
[Sorry for the double post, I had to dig for that exponent, thanks.][/QUOTE] That's a PrimeNet bug that's existed for many years. It only analyses if the line received increases the previous count, and doesn't take into account any higher TF results that already exist. A few years ago I went through everything under 100M and fixed all those by taking exponents one higher. |
Similar here, sometime ago we did a 67-to-68 for many exponents to fix the non-contiguity. PrimeNet is missing the intermediary bit. If the reports is found in the DB, then James/George may "fix" it. If not, then the 75 need to be re-done, and it will show the 76 too.
Edit: can you get back and report the 74-75 again? You may get a "range not needed" error, buy it may fix the DB. |
So I checked all my stuck assignments, and all had a skipped bit level. I'm filling the gap over the next 12 hours or so.
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 06:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.