[QUOTE=storm5510;532202]Has the automated submission to [I]PrimeNet[/I] from [I]Colab[/I] been implemented? Based on my experience yesterday evening, it would seem so... :unsure:[/QUOTE]Based on my experience of right now, I would say not, at least not for TF. Are you talking about mfaktc or mprime?

[QUOTE=storm5510;532202]Has the automated submission to [I]PrimeNet[/I] from [I]Colab[/I] been implemented? Based on my experience yesterday evening, it would seem so... :unsure:[/QUOTE]

Nope. I'm only now back to transition from the "limping" GPU72 server to the new one (with Toshiba HDs!).

I /was/ doing some clean-up last night, clearing out results which had been done by "Anonymous" TF Notebook runs. Is this what you're talking about? Or have I made (yet another) stupid administrator's error?

[QUOTE=chalsall;532205]Nope. I'm only now back to transition from the "limping" GPU72 server to the new one (with Toshiba HDs!).

I /was/ doing some clean-up last night, clearing out results which had been done by "Anonymous" TF Notebook runs. Is this what you're talking about? Or have I made (yet another) stupid administrator's error?[/QUOTE]

I believe he is talking about this:

[CODE]https://www.gpu72.com/account/colab/results/
.
.
This will be automated shortly... [/CODE]

[QUOTE=petrw1;532210]I believe he is talking about this:[/QUOTE]

Yeah... And then just about every system imaginable failed all at once... :cry:

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;532203]Based on my experience of right now, I would say not, at least not for TF. Are you talking about mfaktc or mprime?[/QUOTE]

[I]mfaktc[/I]. I tried to submit more today, manually, They were refused. [U]Result not needed[/U], it said.

[QUOTE=storm5510;532230][I]mfaktc[/I]. I tried to submit more today, manually, They were refused. [U]Result not needed[/U], it said.[/QUOTE]Look at your PrimeNet account results page. I submitted some manual results the other day [earlier this week] (a mix of Colab and mfakto on my integrated graphics chip). They were all marked as not needed, but shouldn't have been. Some were in the 200,000,000 range and I manually raised the assignment by an extra bit. I got the assignment via Prime95, moved them over to the mfakto worktodo, and change the 70,71 to 70,72 at the end of each line. Then I waited until it was done with 72 bits and submitted 71 and 72 at the same time.

I think it is a problem with PrimeNet's processing.

[QUOTE=chalsall;532205]I /was/ doing some clean-up last night, clearing out results which had been done by "Anonymous" TF Notebook runs.[/QUOTE] I noticed a bit of other clean-up happening.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;532234]I submitted some manual results the other day... They were all marked as not needed, but shouldn't have been.
I think it is a problem with PrimeNet's processing.[/QUOTE]Both [i]Uncwilly[/i] and [i]storm5510[/i]: If you can identify a specific exponent for which this happened I can take a look and perhaps figure out why you got that message.

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;532239]Both [i]Uncwilly[/i] and [i]storm5510[/i]: If you can identify a specific exponent for which this happened I can take a look and perhaps figure out why you got that message.[/QUOTE]I am sending you a PM with my best guesses at some of the exponents in question.

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;532239]Both [I]Uncwilly[/I] and [I]storm5510[/I]: If you can identify a specific exponent for which this happened I can take a look and perhaps figure out why you got that message.[/QUOTE]

M94052807, M95431241, M95431309, M95432759, and M95435729. These five were submitted as a group from my notebook results page.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly]Look at your PrimeNet account results page...[/QUOTE]

They are all there, twice.

[QUOTE=storm5510;532245]They are all there, twice.[/QUOTE]

I don't see anything unusual in the GPU72 database. Single assignment, single results record in the ColabResults table.

Is there any chance you didn't wait long enough for the results to be "observed" by GPU72 (can take up to 30 minutes, depending on the range) before copy-and-pasting again?