[QUOTE=Mark Rose;415318]I've noticed this behaviour if I select "Lowest Exponent". If I pick "What makes sense" it works as expected, giving out assignments at 50M+.[/QUOTE]

"Lowest Exponent" can go to quite high exponents if no upper limit is set. Careful balancing between range and request types can pull in just about anything which is available. Reference [URL]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/available/[/URL] to set your parameters. I occasionally get the urge to take assignments from lower levels (factor lust). This gets me into 73M to 76+M territory.

Doing LLTF, until recently, GPU72 was giving me 67M assignments from 74 to 75, with either WMS or Let GPU Decide selected. I see that the ones I have queued since a few days are high 74M's and low 75M's from 74 to 75. Would this be to keep the churners fed?

EDIT: I realize that 67M has been essentially wiped out.

[QUOTE=kladner;415357]"Lowest Exponent" can go to quite high exponents if no upper limit is set. Careful balancing between range and request types can pull in just about anything which is available. Reference [URL]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/available/[/URL] to set your parameters. I occasionally get the urge to take assignments from lower levels (factor lust). This gets me into 73M to 76+M territory.

Doing LLTF, until recently, GPU72 was giving me 67M assignments from 74 to 75, with either WMS or Let GPU Decide selected. I see that the ones I have queued since a few days are high 74M's and low 75M's from 74 to 75. Would this be to keep the churners fed?

EDIT: I realize that 67M has been essentially wiped out.[/QUOTE]
I just picked off three stray 67M's, and then got a couple of 68M's using WMS. It's fun to empty a column.

[QUOTE=kladner;415357]"Lowest Exponent" can go to quite high exponents if no upper limit is set. Careful balancing between range and request types can pull in just about anything which is available. Reference [URL]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/available/[/URL] to set your parameters. I occasionally get the urge to take assignments from lower levels (factor lust). This gets me into 73M to 76+M territory.[/QUOTE]

I think you're describing the behaviour of "Lowest TF level" not "Lowest Exponent".

"Workers' Overall Progress for the last Day" report
 

I thought this report included only the previous 24 hours of work, but I noticed that AirSquirrels numbers have not changed in several days.

If a user does no work in a 24 hour period, I thought this report should show zeroes. Does it default to the last 24 hour period of activity when no new work is being reported?

[QUOTE=Mark Rose;415375]I think you're describing the behaviour of "Lowest TF level" not "Lowest Exponent".[/QUOTE]

Oops!

[QUOTE=Chuck;415382]I thought this report included only the previous 24 hours of work, but I noticed that AirSquirrels numbers have not changed in several days. If a user does no work in a 24 hour period, I thought this report should show zeroes. Does it default to the last 24 hour period of activity when no new work is being reported?[/QUOTE]

You have caught me out. :smile:

Because of the computational load to do a full recompute, it can take a while for inactive participants to be marked as "dirty" (in a cache sense).

This actually annoys me. Some do an amazing amount of work, but only submit their results only every week or so.

This is, at the end of the day, my mistake, not theirs. I expected results to be submitted at least within 24 hours of completion. This doesn't always happen.

Again, my mistake. I thank the heavy hitters for the fire-power.

[QUOTE=chalsall;415452]I thank the heavy hitters for the five-power.[/QUOTE]Yes, thanks!
...
Is that like something[sup]5[/sup], or 5[sup]something[/sup]? :unsure:

It's not just you! [URL]http://www.gpu72.com[/URL] looks down from here. ?

"500 Internal Server Error"

It's Baaaack! :smile:

[QUOTE=kladner;416329]It's not just you! [URL]http://www.gpu72.com[/URL] looks down from here. ?

"500 Internal Server Error"

It's Baaaack![/QUOTE]

Hmmm....

It's happening again, but now it is reported as "Just Me."

Time to power cycle the cable modem.

[QUOTE=kladner;416336]It's happening again, but now it is reported as "Just Me."

Time to power cycle the cable modem.[/QUOTE]

Just for the information. The problem seems to be somewhere in my connection.

Well, cable modem reset has not helped. DNS for the router seems to be in order, Is It Everyone still says it's just me. At one point I was able to see the GPU72 home page, but not individual statistics or assignments pages. Now they all respond very quickly with the 500 Server Error message.

Oh well. Almost time for work, anyway.