[QUOTE=Mark Rose;409355]I just grabbed 1300 GHzd of LG72D LLTF and it gave me back 34 72->74 assignments in the 72.9M range. Was that intended?[/QUOTE]

Yes. Sorry, I should have been clearer...

LG72D will balance between going to 75 or 74, depending on our current "real-time" situation. Right now we're really short of candidates without P-1 done at even 74, so the "AI" decided we needed some "to 74" work done.

Thanks for pitching in! :smile:

:smile:Having run tests, CUFFTbench, and Threadbench, I am now 4 hours from completing a 36M LLDC on the MSI GTX580. One thing, I picked up this assignment from PrimeNet instead of GPU72. I have checked it with with PrimeNet, but of course, it does not show on GPU72.

Chris, may I send you the information privately? I should have had P95 acquire an assignment through the proxy, but did not think it through at the time. Of course, if it doesn't match, I won't want to report it. :razz:

EDIT: This is only a test. I will go back to LLTF on that card in 3h 34m. :smile:

[QUOTE=chalsall;409354]
I would ask that those who are doing LLTF'ing, please "pledge" to at least 74, or choose the "Let GPU72 Decide" option (which will take candidates to 75 currently). There are many "big guns" who are currently doing "breadth first" (read: TF'ing from 71 to 72); yes, that work has to be done in the future, but we have hungry P-1'ers and LL'ers to feed right now.
[/QUOTE]

GUILTY as charged....I liked to help empty a box in the "71" column of the available assignments report by working 71—>72 and being able to complete 200/day, but I know my time is better spent with "Let GPU72 Decide", so I have gone back to that work.

Sorry for this extended digression.....

[QUOTE=kladner;409364]
[QUOTE]EDIT: This is only a test. I will go back to LLTF on that card in 3h 34m. :smile:[/QUOTE]

Sigh. It did not match the only previous result. I will get back to this after I put some LLTF work through the card. Even though it passed -r 1 at the settings used, I probably need to run with more conservative settings.

[QUOTE=kladner;409382]
Sigh. It did not match the only previous result.[/QUOTE]


Of it could be correct and the other incorrect. No reason to delete data.

No. I'll submit it.

This is the [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=36114457&full=1"]item in question[/URL].

To test the decreased RAM and see if it makes it stable, I'll double-check it.

Cool! Thanks. :smile:

Just for my reference, how far did you drop your RAM speeds to get stability?

[QUOTE=chalsall;409358]Yes. Sorry, I should have been clearer...

LG72D will balance between going to 75 or 74, depending on our current "real-time" situation. Right now we're really short of candidates without P-1 done at even 74, so the "AI" decided we needed some "to 74" work done.

Thanks for pitching in! :smile:[/QUOTE]

I have a little under three days of DCTF to finish up, which is queued for tomorrow, then I'll let GPU72 decide for a while. I know my contribution won't be enough though.

Is GPU to 72 being really slow to give out assignments for anyone else? I've noticed the stats pages being slow over the past few days and occasionally the assignments page; just now it took over a minute for me to get 30 assignments. Basically any page containing data that changes seems very slow to load.