I've found 5, but I have no idea how many attempts

We turn in our first batch tomorrow. So far there are five 74→75 factors!

:max:

[QUOTE=TheMawn;397724]What is the overall success rate with TF to 75? I have still not found a factor and I'm pushing 300 attempts...[/QUOTE]

3/299 in the 66M range

1/50 in the 74M range

Would any of you mind giving me a couple of the exponents that you've found factors for in 74 -> 75? 0/300 is a bit concerning and I'd like to check that my hardware isn't rejecting 75 bits for some reason.

[CODE]
66545503
66428893
66422129
66362921
66341423
71641907
[/CODE]

Thanks.

[QUOTE=TheMawn;397724]What is the overall success rate with TF to 75? I have still not found a factor and I'm pushing 300 attempts...[/QUOTE]

8796 runs from 74 to 75; 106 factors found -- ~1/83.

Edit: Deeper query to include those assignments from below 74 and/or beyond 75: 12713 runs covering 74 to 75; 147 factors found within 74 to 75 -- ~1/86.5.

Updated Workers' Overall Progress report.
 

Just so everyone knows, I've updated the [URL="https://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/"]Workers' Overall Progress[/URL] report to include TF'ing to 74 and 75 (and >75). As before, you can click on the column headers to see who's doing what to where. For [URL="https://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/75/"]example, those going to 75[/URL].

I'm afraid it makes the table rather wide, but I know people have been wanting this data exposed.

I looked at your link, and clicked my name out of curiosity, and it took me to [url=https://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker/111,347/]here[/url], which gives me blank graphs for Anonymous. Not just me, all the links under the name are broken.

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;397774]I looked at your link, and clicked my name out of curiosity, and it took me to [url=https://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker/111,347/]here[/url], which gives me blank graphs for Anonymous. Not just me, all the links under the name are broken.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, thanks... SPE. Fixed.

[QUOTE=chalsall;397773]I'm afraid it makes the table rather wide, but I know people have been wanting this data exposed.[/QUOTE]

It still displays fine in a 1200 pixel wide window. Most screens can display it just fine. :)