[QUOTE=chalsall;286402]This is Ground Control to Major Tom
You’ve really made the grade
And the papers want to know whose shirts you wear
Now it’s time to leave the capsule if you dare

(Meant to be funny....)[/QUOTE]


LOL! Take cover!

EDIT: Hasn't happened (or been observed) yet.

Or yet.

IT HAZ HAPPENED

I've added my ~625 GD stash of results to the pile.


Edit: Nuts.
[code]Aggregate Computing Power

Today, last 24 hours

Week, last 7 days

Month, last 30 days

Potential
TFLOP/sec Actual
TFLOP/sec Potential
TFLOP/sec Actual
TFLOP/sec Potential
TFLOP/sec Actual
TFLOP/sec
99.413 104.976 206.943 79.642 466.720 74.418
Power GHz-Days Power GHz-Days Power GHz-Days
[B][I][U]105%[/U][/I][/B] 52488 38% 278747 15% 1116262
[/code]

[QUOTE=Dubslow;286424]IT HAZ HAPPENED

I've added my ~625 GD stash of results to the pile.[/QUOTE]

You have not broken the system.

If you had, you would not be able to see the results.

QED.

@Dubslow: If you're looking for other delayed deliveries, check out LL 13-22: lalera and ethan (EO). They've been flatlined since 12/19 or before. Of course, this could show a reallocation of resources. I haven't looked for them on other graphs.

EDIT: Actually, "Pete" has been on almost as long a hiatus, too.

[QUOTE=kladner;286432]EDIT: Actually, "Pete" has been on almost as long a hiatus, too.[/QUOTE]

Really?

"Pete", the number one contributor to G72 for DC TF, and number three overall, has been on hiatus?

Perhaps I'm not reading the same graphs you are.

Could you please expand on what you mean?

[QUOTE=kladner;286432]@Dubslow: If you're looking for other delayed deliveries, check out LL 13-22: lalera and ethan (EO). They've been flatlined since 12/19 or before. Of course, this could show a reallocation of resources. I haven't looked for them on other graphs.[/QUOTE]

Neither of them has any TF assignments, and lalera only has ~2 DC assignments. Ethan has zip, zero, nada.

[QUOTE=Dubslow;286435]Neither of them has any TF assignments, and lalera only has ~2 DC assignments. Ethan has zip, zero, nada.[/QUOTE]

Once upon a time (a time before xyzzy and Craig) Ethan was the big fish in the project.

[QUOTE=Dubslow;286424]
Edit: Nuts.
[code]Aggregate Computing Power

Today, last 24 hours

Week, last 7 days

Month, last 30 days

Potential
TFLOP/sec Actual
TFLOP/sec Potential
TFLOP/sec Actual
TFLOP/sec Potential
TFLOP/sec Actual
TFLOP/sec
99.413 104.976 206.943 79.642 466.720 74.418
Power GHz-Days Power GHz-Days Power GHz-Days
[B][I][U]105%[/U][/I][/B] 52488 38% 278747 15% 1116262
[/code][/QUOTE]
Hehe, we're at 112% now :smile:

[QUOTE=chalsall;286434]Really?

"Pete", the number one contributor to G72 for DC TF, and number three overall, has been on hiatus?

Perhaps I'm not reading the same graphs you are.

Could you please expand on what you mean?[/QUOTE]

Sorry. Tunnel vision. Pete should have been fresh in my mind, since I noted his broad distribution of work types in the last day or so. A little more use of the various graphs and tables would have given me a better idea.

In paltry defense, I did say of the first two that they might have reallocated their resources. But that seems, per Dubslow, to be true in the sense that lalera and Ethan are not dining at the GPU272 table just now.

EDIT: I am puzzled by TF exponents which turned up with Error 40's in my Results this morning. I realize that my attentiveness is questionable, given the above. Still, my first thought was that I had fumbled distributing assignments between workers -Copied instead Cut from a list, for instance. But I checked my completions and they weren't there. When I checked on the PrimeNet "Status" page I found this:

[CODE]46876849 -Greg 70-71 -RichD0 71-72
45164401 -rduerr 70-71 -RichD0 71-72
45103577 -rduerr 70-71 -RichD0 71-72[/CODE]
This seems to suggest that these assignments never were mine. I'm just not sure how I would have put them in queue if that were the case. Am I missing something? Did I let them expire, or some such?

[QUOTE=kladner;286475]This seems to suggest that these assignments never were mine. I'm just not sure how I would have put them in queue if that were the case. Am I missing something? Did I let them expire, or some such?[/QUOTE]

According to the database records, these three were never assigned to you. And none of them were the subject of the PrimeNet expiry bug. Also, please note that I have turned off the automatic expiry script until I've got the "Extend" function enabled.

The only thing I can think of is is it possible you unreserved them yourself? The system doesn't actually keep track of that itself (although it probably should).

I could restore into a forensic database a backup of the tables to see if you had them at some point in the past. Could you give me an idea as to when you think you had them assigned?

Please let me know, and if you (or anyone else) sees similar issues in the future.

I take the avoidance of duplication of effort (and faith in the system) very seriously.