You are asking too many questions :razz:. Install Misfit. (it works for win64 too, very well). Configure user names in Misfit (very easy!). You don't need it configured in mfaktc. Generaly, go without user name, dates, times, etc in mfaktc: it makes report files shorter and easier to pass on to the server. Misfit takes care of the rest.

About printing every class: Use PrintMode=1 in the mfaktc.ini to overprint the lines [edit: it needs restarting mfaktc] (yes, it prints every class, and for a 70-71 bit assignment this could mean every second, you can not change this). If still bothersome, play with ProgressFormat line (like make it void) or redirect in a >nul device. But usually PrintMode=1 will do the trick. When you work @74 bits, each class takes (tens of) minutes to print.

Congrats for the card! It does the same job as one of my (water cooled) 580s, at a fraction of the wattage. Good choice!

NEVER too many questions....hahaha
 

[QUOTE=LaurV;388458]You are asking too many questions :razz:. Install Misfit. (it works for win64 too, very well). Configure user names in Misfit (very easy!). You don't need it configured in mfaktc. Generaly, go without user name, dates, times, etc in mfaktc: it makes report files shorter and easier to pass on to the server. Misfit takes care of the rest.

About printing every class: Use PrintMode=1 in the mfaktc.ini to overprint the lines [edit: it needs restarting mfaktc] (yes, it prints every class, and for a 70-71 bit assignment this could mean every second, you can not change this). If still bothersome, play with ProgressFormat line (like make it void) or redirect in a >nul device. But usually PrintMode=1 will do the trick. When you work @74 bits, each class takes (tens of) minutes to print.

Congrats for the card! It does the same job as one of my (water cooled) 580s, at a fraction of the wattage. Good choice![/QUOTE]

Thanks for the answers so far....less than MP44 questions to go....

It seems MISFIT IS NOT the same as the Submission Spider Chris talks about?

Do they do the same things? Compete? Complement each other?

Is this Capitalism/competition at its finest?

Should I read more and ask less questions????? I vote "YES".

They do the same thing, but Misfit is doing it much better, unfortunately it only works on windoze (it uses some .net stuff or so). New developments which I am not aware of, may include *nix, but I don't believe. If you windoze, take misfit. You can easily compile it if you are skeptical, sources are available. Submission spider is (are some) python/perl/bash/batch files which run on alien stuff like Linux :wink:. You don't need that for windows.

Chris' submission spider on the GPU72 site is a perl script. It does the same job as Misfit, but works on all platforms. There is also mfloop.py, a python which I use (and hack on). mfloop.py is probably the best tool for non-Windows systems.

But in your case, just use Misfit :)

oh, c'mon boyar!
[ATTACH]12016[/ATTACH]

p.s. as seen in the header, the visualization site is working, so it is not the server (I assume they are physically the same computer?)

500 Internal Server Error
[QUOTE][B]Internal Server Error[/B]

The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator, [email]chalsall@ideas4lease.com[/email] and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.
More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
[/QUOTE]
This is from the Overall individual statistics page.

The server still responds, just slowly.

[QUOTE=petrw1;388442]Benchmark submitted[/QUOTE]Thanks. And it's in line with expected. 388GHd/d is at stock clock of 1050MHz, your is running at 1392MHz, so 388 * (1392 / 1050) = 514GHd/d

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;388489]Thanks. And it's in line with expected. 388GHd/d is at stock clock of 1050MHz, your is running at 1392MHz, so 388 * (1392 / 1050) = 514GHd/d[/QUOTE]

Interesting. 1392 MHz is well above any card's base clock, so it must be the boost clock. And if the boost clock can be sustained like that, the GTX 970 is an even better value.

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;388489]Thanks. And it's in line with expected. 388GHd/d is at stock clock of 1050MHz, your is running at 1392MHz, so 388 * (1392 / 1050) = 514GHd/d[/QUOTE]

Good to know but I made no changes nor did I ask for any. I had the card added by a local shop. Now I did happen to mention I use this PC and GPU for extreme number crunching only...no games. So he may have boosted it for me but if so he did not ask or tell.

I believe it is this card:
[url]http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125684[/url]

GIGABYTE GV-N970G1 GAMING-4GD GeForce GTX 970 4GB 256-Bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 HDCP Ready G-SYNC Support Video Card

But it only has a BOOST clock of 1329. I suspect I typed it in wrong (transposed the last 2 digits).
514 * 1329 / 1392 = 490.
Though with the window open over night and the room dropping to 55F it got as high as 509.

[QUOTE=petrw1;388496]Good to know but I made no changes nor did I ask for any. I had the card added by a local shop. Now I did happen to mention I use this PC and GPU for extreme number crunching only...no games. So he may have boosted it for me but if so he did not ask or tell.[/QUOTE]

The boost is automatic. The card will boost if it's within the power and heat limitations.