[QUOTE=VictordeHolland;380178]That doesn't seem right?[/QUOTE]

Yeah... I noticed that as well, and it isn't right. I can't explain how it happened though; started a little more an a month ago, and only for that single range...

As no one is being assigned 34M candates by Primenet at the moment I decided to simply let sleeping dragons lie. But since you brought this forward I have released everything not assigned by GPU72 back to Primenet, and am now bringing everything back in.

What are you two exactly talking about?
The GPU72 TF assignments are NOT reserved from PrimeNet as TF assignments. For PrimeNet, which is not "gpu-aware", the TF level is much lower and these ranges are long time ago "done" for TF, from PN's point of view. That is why GPU72 reserves exponents "for LL", we do LLTF to few bits higher than the PN's TF limit, and we then release them back. Therefore, GPU72's TFs (or part of them) do not appear as TF reservations on PN.

Or is this different now? At least this is how we started, if I remember right, and the subject is discussed on the forum many times, when "newbies" complain that their TF reservations appear on PN as reserved by other user for LL ("For Research").

So, if I didn't understand wrong, the "issue" described by Victor is quite normal...

[QUOTE=LaurV;380219]What are you two exactly talking about?
The GPU72 TF assignments are NOT reserved from PrimeNet as TF assignments.For PrimeNet, which is not "gpu-aware", the TF level is much lower and these ranges are long time ago "done" for TF, from PN's point of view. That is why GPU72 reserves exponents "for LL", we do LLTF to few bits higher than the PN's TF limit, and we then release them back. Therefore, GPU72's TFs (or part of them) do not appear as TF reservations on PN.

Or is this different now? At least this is how we started, if I remember right, and the subject is discussed on the forum many times, when "newbies" complain that their TF reservations appear on PN as reserved by other user for LL ("For Research").

So, if I didn't understand wrong, the "issue" described by Victor is quite normal...[/QUOTE]
Not any-more, *most* LLTF and DCTF show up in the Work Distribution map as assigned TF. Don't know when the change took place, but some time ago.

[QUOTE=LaurV;380219]Or is this different now? At least this is how we started, if I remember right, and the subject is discussed on the forum many times, when "newbies" complain that their TF reservations appear on PN as reserved by other user for LL ("For Research").[/QUOTE]

It's been different for quite some time, at least for most candidates.

Some are still being reserved by "For Research" / "wabbit" (recycled captured by one of my spiders), but most are reserved by "GPU72" / "gpufactoring" using a different spider.

Christ, could you load the 46M range in GPU72 for DCTF (the last DC range for 68-69 bit), at the current rate (5000 exponents/week) I expect the 45M range (to 69bit) to be ready in 4-7 days.

Thanks in advance.

[QUOTE=VictordeHolland;380485]Christ, could you load the 46M range in GPU72 for DCTF.[/QUOTE]

Golly! I've been elevated from Christopher to Christ!

[QUOTE=chalsall;380487]Golly! I've been elevated from Christopher to Christ![/QUOTE]

I thought he was just really mad.

[QUOTE=chalsall;380487]Golly! I've been elevated from Christopher to Christ![/QUOTE]
The flying spaghetti monster took over control there for a second!

[QUOTE=VictordeHolland;380503]The flying spaghetti monster took over control there for a second![/QUOTE]
Blessed be the Noodly Appendage!

Need some additional DCTF'ing...
 

Just to let everyone know that we're running a bit low on DC Cat4 candidates -- only about ten days worth or so.

So, for those willing, taking a hundred or so of DCTF "What Makes Sense" or "Let GPU72 Decide" would be much appreciated.

Makes Sense[SUP]TM[/SUP] makes sense to me. I'll grab a few next time I'm visiting the shop.