A few AMD price updates :smile:

R7 240 is [URL="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007709%20600473872&IsNodeId=1&name=Radeon%20R7%20240"]$70[/URL].
R7 250 is [URL="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007709%20600473873&IsNodeId=1"]$90[/URL].
R7 250X is [URL="http://www.anandtech.com/show/7751/amd-announces-radeon-r7-250x-shipping-today"]$99[/URL].
R7 260 is $109.
R7 260X is $139.
R7 265 is ~[URL="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007709%20600489396&IsNodeId=1"]$160[/URL].

R9 270 is [URL="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007709%20600481061&IsNodeId=1"]$180[/URL].
R9 270X is [URL="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007709%20600481061&IsNodeId=1"]$199[/URL].
R9 280 is [URL="http://www.anandtech.com/show/8019/amd-cuts-radeon-r9-280-to-249"]$250[/URL].
R9 280X is ~[URL="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007709%20600473876&IsNodeId=1"]$300-$310[/URL].

[URL="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007709%20600473877&IsNodeId=1"]R9 290[/URL] and [URL="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007709%20600473871&IsNodeId=1"]290X[/URL] pricing is all over the place... but not $552 and $674.

GPU pricing is in Canadian Dollars. Pricing is taken semi-live as an average selling price from a major (Canadian) retailer. If you happen to live in the land of cheap then lucky you. USA prices are probably 25% less (our government needs the money to pay the utility bill to keep this place frozen all year long).

Getting a bit more on topic of the website again: The "Individual Overall Statistics"-page doesn't show up any assignments completed in the 70M or 71M-range.
That should be only pulling over one or two switches, right? ;)

Wow!!!
 

I'm beginning to get the impression that Oliver might 0wnz EC2.... :wink:

[URL="https://www.gpu72.com/graphs/worker/ghzdays_exact/6e67460a77a11a707a665a6270df1a82/"]20,000 GHz days/day for the last week![/URL]

Thanks mate! This helps a lot.

[QUOTE=manfred4;373770]Getting a bit more on topic of the website again: The "Individual Overall Statistics"-page doesn't show up any assignments completed in the 70M or 71M-range. That should be only pulling over one or two switches, right? ;)[/QUOTE]

Good catch! Thanks.

I've commented out the "... and Exponent<70000000" constraint in the SQL query. (GPU72 has been running for a lot longer than I ever imaged -- it was originally envisioned to be short-term sub-project.)

In an "order by fire power", I see a "[URL="http://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker/c87ea45fa5e7920bc6d4a431af1c3698/"]NickOfTime[/URL]" coming very strong from the back. With about 2THzD/D, that sounds like 4 Titans or a lot of AMD fire power. With ~29G/factor, it means he is doing the last bit, for which the 39 factors from 46 expected sounds statistically good. So, he is not cheating, he [U]has[/U] a lot of fire power.

So.. Who is he? Same "Nick" from the forum, or new meat? :razz:
Congrats anyhow, and kotgw!

[QUOTE=LaurV;373807]In an "order by fire power", I see a "[URL="http://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker/c87ea45fa5e7920bc6d4a431af1c3698/"]NickOfTime[/URL]" coming very strong from the back. With about 2THzD/D, that sounds like 4 Titans or a lot of AMD fire power. With ~29G/factor, it means he is doing the last bit, for which the 39 factors from 46 expected sounds statistically good. So, he is not cheating, he [U]has[/U] a lot of fire power.

So.. Who is he? Same "Nick" from the forum, or new meat? :razz:
Congrats anyhow, and kotgw![/QUOTE]

I noticed yesterday... Hmm.
[url]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/week/[/url]

EDIT: Titan's do 500 GHz?

[QUOTE=kracker;373808]EDIT: Titan's do 500 GHz?[/QUOTE]
The unlocked Titan (the one which you can enable/disable the DP from the Nvidia Control Panel) can do ~520GD/D with DP disabled and a bit of OC (only a bit, didn't try more, I bought the one from Xyzzy, which is still air cooled, I am planing to buy the water block, but no budget/time yet).

[QUOTE=LaurV;373807]So.. Who is he? Same "Nick" from the forum, or new meat? :razz:
Congrats anyhow, and kotgw![/QUOTE]

I can't speak to that. Well, actually I can, but I won't.

I thank him for his contributions. Seems very honest.

Well... statistically we seem to be [URL="https://www.gpu72.com/graphs/ghzdays/halfyear/"]doing well[/URL] :smile:

[QUOTE=chalsall;373774]Good catch! Thanks.

I've commented out the "... and Exponent<70000000" constraint in the SQL query. (GPU72 has been running for a lot longer than I ever imaged -- it was originally envisioned to be short-term sub-project.)[/QUOTE]

Did you implement that one yet? If you did, it seems to be not working as intended now, the 70M+ Assignments are not showing up yet (on [URL="http://en.gpu72.com/reports/factoring_cost/"]this[/URL] one neither).