[QUOTE=bayanne;367713]I have been trying to get exponents from 320m and up, but without success.
Anyone else had the same problem?[/QUOTE]
A change happened recently. Try putting in 320,000,000 as your minimum exponent. Set your bit level and number of exponents or GHz-days. Then select "lowest exponent". That last step did not used to be required. It is now, for the higher exponents, like those in the 332M range.

[QUOTE=bayanne;367713]I have been trying to get exponents from 320m and up, but without success.
Anyone else had the same problem?[/QUOTE]

Not to tell you what to do and what not to do, but just know that the 320M range is almost the least interesting one you could pick. 100 million digits starts in 332M. 320M is not 100 million digits so if you ever invested a serious amount of work into that you wouldn't be finding a 100 million digit prime which is sort of the next thing.

On the other hand, you probably do have your reasons for looking at that range but in case you wanted 100 million digits, I just wanted to let you know.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;367752]A change happened recently. Try putting in 320,000,000 as your minimum exponent. Set your bit level and number of exponents or GHz-days. Then select "lowest exponent". That last step did not used to be required. It is now, for the higher exponents, like those in the 332M range.[/QUOTE]

Worked fine, many thanks :smile:

What has happened to the "Production Heuristics" part of the "View Assignments" page? The headers are still there, just no info. :huh:

[QUOTE=kladner;368724]What has happened to the "Production Heuristics" part of the "View Assignments" page? The headers are still there, just no info. :huh:[/QUOTE]

Sorry... Yet another SPE...

I made a quick-and-dirty change to help another user yesterday with an issue, but didn't do the appropriate regression tests (I'm /very/ busy at the moment). Corrected.

[QUOTE=chalsall;368771]Sorry... Yet another SPE...

I made a quick-and-dirty change to help another user yesterday with an issue, but didn't do the appropriate regression tests (I'm /very/ busy at the moment). Corrected.[/QUOTE]

Thanks, Chris. It was a very minor SPE. I hope your "busy-ness" is having good results. Thanks again for all you do. :tu:

Hey Chris, can you check what's wrong with 31689991? It is being reported every hour or so, getting GPU72 credit, in spite of the fact that PrimeNet does not accept it. I mean, I like to see 5000 GHzDays of DC for me done within today, but kracker might get angry about :razz:

Now, honestly, I should keep half of that credit, because I signaled the bug... Huh? Do we share it? :razz:

OTOH, [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_top_500_custom/?team_flag=0&type=1004&rank_lo=39&rank_hi=40&start_date=2000-01-01&end_date=&B1=Get+Report"]hey buddy, do you feel the heat[/URL]? :razz: (no, this is serious, it does not include the bogus credit from GPU72! I am right behind of you, coming fast!)

[QUOTE=LaurV;369410]Hey Chris, can you check what's wrong with 31689991? It is being reported every hour or so, getting GPU72 credit, in spite of the fact that PrimeNet does not accept it. I mean, I like to see 5000 GHzDays of DC for me done within today...[/QUOTE]

Hmmm....

This might very well be a SPE. Either on my part, or by someone responsible for Primenet.

I see what you are reporting from the database records, but since GPU72 no longer assigns any DC nor LL candidates for LL work, I'm going to tentatively suggest that this is Primenet issuing assignments which it shouldn't. The fact that each AID is different (and is in UPPER case only, rather than GPU72's lower case only) supports this argument.

George / Scott / James... Thoughts?

[CODE]mysql> select Exponent,User,Status,Assigned,Completed,AID from Assigned where Exponent=31689991 and WorkType=3;
+----------+----------------------------------+--------+---------------------+---------------------+----------------------------------+
| Exponent | User | Status | Assigned | Completed | AID |
+----------+----------------------------------+--------+---------------------+---------------------+----------------------------------+
| 31689991 | 2423ae6e8f696d5e7d1447de91ca35a6 | 1 | 2014-03-17 18:16:47 | 2014-03-19 07:32:29 | B9CEB39665A4E5934C4F567C1BC918E0 |
| 31689991 | 2423ae6e8f696d5e7d1447de91ca35a6 | 1 | 2014-03-19 07:38:00 | 2014-03-19 07:53:43 | 738C791F34B38722E4850B36BE6DB2C8 |
| 31689991 | 2423ae6e8f696d5e7d1447de91ca35a6 | 1 | 2014-03-19 08:38:38 | 2014-03-19 10:37:40 | 0BDD3D808939B5C44358BB85DDD89F32 |
| 31689991 | 2423ae6e8f696d5e7d1447de91ca35a6 | 1 | 2014-03-19 10:39:30 | 2014-03-19 11:30:56 | 46DDA1184AF584AF2869E7861B21296B |
| 31689991 | 2423ae6e8f696d5e7d1447de91ca35a6 | 1 | 2014-03-19 11:43:14 | 2014-03-19 11:57:02 | DF7A8995AFF8086B031B57AEAE7B8291 |
| 31689991 | 2423ae6e8f696d5e7d1447de91ca35a6 | 1 | 2014-03-19 12:43:46 | 2014-03-19 12:59:43 | 25EB8E8591EC5804109087D1A57C627E |
| 31689991 | 2423ae6e8f696d5e7d1447de91ca35a6 | 1 | 2014-03-19 13:44:19 | 2014-03-19 13:51:28 | 8EAB2068DD7466D2E83FD8B771E3432A |
| 31689991 | 2423ae6e8f696d5e7d1447de91ca35a6 | 1 | 2014-03-19 14:44:58 | 2014-03-19 14:52:23 | 282FA0F4259219E2B983C87AA1EA8FC2 |
| 31689991 | 2423ae6e8f696d5e7d1447de91ca35a6 | 1 | 2014-03-19 15:33:39 | 2014-03-19 15:59:24 | 5B813040FC8330DF87DED877B38CDDA1 |
| 31689991 | d8a75f85f90457298bd3c366a8de2410 | 0 | 2014-03-19 16:12:19 | 2014-03-21 18:55:59 | 535968738BCE8DFB6CC3DC21B8D171EB |
+----------+----------------------------------+--------+---------------------+---------------------+----------------------------------+
10 rows in set (0.00 sec)[/CODE]

P.S. I'm /seriously/ busy at the moment. No code changes will be implemented unless mission critical.

[QUOTE=LaurV;369410]Hey Chris, can you check what's wrong with 31689991? It is being reported every hour or so, getting GPU72 credit, in spite of the fact that PrimeNet does not accept it. I mean, I like to see 5000 GHzDays of DC for me done within today, but kracker might get angry about :razz:

Now, honestly, I should keep half of that credit, because I signaled the bug... Huh? Do we share it? :razz:

OTOH, [URL="http://www.mersenne.org/report_top_500_custom/?team_flag=0&type=1004&rank_lo=39&rank_hi=40&start_date=2000-01-01&end_date=&B1=Get+Report"]hey buddy, do you feel the heat[/URL]? :razz: (no, this is serious, it does not include the bogus credit from GPU72! I am right behind of you, coming fast!)[/QUOTE]

Nope, you mean chalsall passing me, not you. Next!

:razz:

[QUOTE=kracker;369433]Nope, you mean chalsall passing me, not you. Next![/QUOTE]

If you two don't stop fighting I'm going to shut this server down.

I'm serious. I have better things to do with my time.

And then, The Mawn said, very cautiously, that he doesn't think it's funny when people say they're serious when they're joking.