This is where, actually, the dropped assignments matter... :razz:

Hey buddy, do you feel the heat? :razz:
[ATTACH]10451[/ATTACH]

hehehe...

[QUOTE=LaurV;359271]Hey buddy, do you feel the heat? :razz:
[ATTACH]10451[/ATTACH]

hehehe...[/QUOTE]

I just switched some to P-1 a week ago. Nope, I don't. Still chilly.

EDIT: I may get [I]quite a bit[/I] more cores soon. :razz:

[QUOTE=Batalov;359239]There's no "upwards or downwards" in currently implemented trial factoring in either of the programs.
This misunderstanding probably stems from misreading George's remark in the code[/QUOTE]My statement comes from George's code for calculating TF credit: there's one codeblock for TF done using Prime95, and one for "other". I don't have the code in front of me, but if it was something like this: If you have a factor of 70.9 bits, for Prime95 it would give you credit for 70 bits, plus 10% of 70-71 bits. For any other TF program, it would give you credit for 70 bits + 90% of 70-71.

For mesenne.ca I have added another credit-calculating function for mfakt* that determines which class the factor would be found in and grants credit accordingly since bitsize of factor (within a bitlevel) and runtime are unrelated.

[QUOTE=kracker;359278].....

EDIT: I may get [I]quite a bit[/I] more cores soon. :razz:[/QUOTE]

Is there a new toy on your horizon? :cool:

EDIT: BTW, I sure feel Uncwilly breathing down my neck in P-1. :ermm:

[QUOTE=kladner;359283]Is there a new toy on your horizon? :cool:[/QUOTE]

[SIZE="1"]Shhh.....[/SIZE]

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;359282]My statement comes from George's code for calculating TF credit: there's one codeblock for TF done using Prime95, and one for "other". I don't have the code in front of me, but if it was something like this: If you have a factor of 70.9 bits, for Prime95 it would give you credit for 70 bits, plus 10% of 70-71 bits. For any other TF program, it would give you credit for 70 bits + 90% of 70-71.

For mesenne.ca I have added another credit-calculating function for mfakt* that determines which class the factor would be found in and grants credit accordingly since bitsize of factor (within a bitlevel) and runtime are unrelated.[/QUOTE]
Your function makes much more sense!

However, the whole concept of credit, you know, is like this --

[QUOTE=Batalov;359287]the whole concept of credit, you know, is like this[/QUOTE]Certainly :smile:
Most of the TF work I do these days is beyond 1000M and therefore by definition gets no PrimeNet credit.

[QUOTE=kladner;359283]EDIT: BTW, I sure feel Uncwilly breathing down my neck in P-1. :ermm:[/QUOTE]
See attached to see how hot the breath is.
BTW, PrimeNet says that i should overtake you (and 2 or 3 more folks) on the lifetime list in 8 days

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;359320]See attached to see how hot the breath is.
BTW, PrimeNet says that i should overtake you (and 2 or 3 more folks) on the lifetime list in 8 days[/QUOTE]

Yep, and in GPU72 ranking as well.

[QUOTE=kladner;359321]Yep, and in GPU72 ranking as well.[/QUOTE]

And I'm 90% sure I can pass you in the near future as well :razz:

EDIT: That is, if I keep P-1 up instead of DC.