Personal LL total <> top LL total

I think it is related to me unassigning being counted as completed.

Thought I did it right this time. I unassigned from the client only.

It is. I had dropped the remaineder of what I had picked up when we were emergency rolling to only 72, and gained about 10,000 GhzDays that day. :)

[QUOTE=Aramis Wyler;332451]It is. I had dropped the remaineder of what I had picked up when we were emergency rolling to only 72, and gained about 10,000 GhzDays that day. :)[/QUOTE]

OK. I obviously am a Stupid Programmer, and made an Error... :smile:

I'll have some cycles to look into this this weekend.

(No data was permanently harmed during the results of this error.)

[QUOTE=chalsall;332471]I'll have some cycles to look into this this weekend.
[/QUOTE]
Oh no! Please don't look into it this weekend, I just need 3-4 days more to be able to point you to [URL="http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/saved/"]this link[/URL] and say "see what happens when you mix the saved time of LLTF with the saved time of LMHTF? you come on the second place!" :razz:

[QUOTE=LaurV;332477]Oh no! Please don't look into it this weekend, I just need 3-4 days more to be able to point you to [URL="http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/saved/"]this link[/URL] and say "see what happens when you mix the saved time of LLTF with the saved time of LMHTF? you come on the second place!" :razz:[/QUOTE]

LOL... James has already given me an elegant solution to this "problem".

Thanks for reminding me.... :razz:

The "GHz Days per Day of Work Saved by x" doesn't seem to be that accurate, as [URL="https://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker/factors/d0a0a9610115a8227c686f0d8951998b/bydate/"]here[/URL] shows I found 2 factors, one at 03.08, and 03.09, but those two factors have appeared BEFORE 03.07 in the "saved" graph [URL="https://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker/d0a0a9610115a8227c686f0d8951998b/"]here[/URL].

(I remember the graph before, those two bars were NOT there at 03.05 and 06 before the two factors I found today and yesterday)

[QUOTE=kracker;332571]The "GHz Days per Day of Work Saved by x" doesn't seem to be that accurate, as [URL="https://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker/factors/d0a0a9610115a8227c686f0d8951998b/bydate/"]here[/URL] shows I found 2 factors, one at 03.08, and 03.09, but those two factors have appeared BEFORE 03.07 in the "saved" graph [URL="https://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker/d0a0a9610115a8227c686f0d8951998b/"]here[/URL].

(I remember the graph before, those two bars were NOT there at 03.05 and 06 before the two factors I found today and yesterday)[/QUOTE]

None of the charts are an accurate representation of what and when people have reported anymore, ever since 'somebody' decided it would be a good idea to compensate for those workers who only report results occasionally. From what I've seen all results get 'randomly' spread over several days, if you want an accurate representation of what you have done, you will have to keep your own records and create your own graphs :sad:

I want a GPU like Carsten has — he did 17,000+ GHz days yesterday according to the statistics.

[QUOTE=Antonio;332626]From what I've seen all results get 'randomly' spread over several days, if you want an accurate representation of what you have done, you will have to keep your own records and create your own graphs :sad:[/QUOTE]

When I implemented this, I did say that no information is lost. There's an "adjusted" field in the table which is used to spread the results out over the time they were out.

This has had a very useful effect of removing huge spikes in the overall graphs. However, if people want (and I get the impression they do) I could make available graphs for individuals without the adjustments.

[QUOTE=chalsall;332647]When I implemented this, I did say that no information is lost. There's an "adjusted" field in the table which is used to spread the results out over the time they were out.

This has had a very useful effect of removing huge spikes in the overall graphs. However, if people want (and I get the impression they do) I could make available graphs for individuals without the adjustments.[/QUOTE]

Ah, for like people who don't upload daily?

EDIT: Can/may I have them w/o adjustments? thanks!

[QUOTE=kracker;332650]
EDIT: Can/may I have them w/o adjustments? thanks![/QUOTE]

It would be interesting to see, at least.