I've sent a report bug to the Contact Us on the home page several days ago. Is that address still monitored?

[QUOTE=RichD;330035]I've sent a report bug to the Contact Us on the home page several days ago. Is that address still monitored?[/QUOTE]

Yes. And thanks for the report. I just haven't had time to drill down on it yet.

[QUOTE=Uncwilly;329931]It is up to 2400 as of today. The TF assignments are only around 59, which is in the typical range. The number of 100M digit assignments that have yet to yield a result after a year or better seems quite high >97%[/QUOTE]
I don't see why this would be considered unusual, it took me right around a year to complete one and that was after moving it to a bit of a monster machine and devoting 2 cores (though it did have to have P-1 and a fair amount of TF done)

[QUOTE=bcp19;330138]I don't see why this would be considered unusual, it took me right around a year to complete one and that was after moving it to a bit of a monster machine and devoting 2 cores (though it did have to have P-1 and a fair amount of TF done)[/QUOTE]Most of them have not done a single bit level of TF during that year. Even on a slow machine with a single core, one can take the expo from 74 to 75 in a reasonable time period. That is part of yielding a result. If the folks had taken the exponents that they got to 77, the current factoring report would be quite different.

Is the site currently down?

[QUOTE=KyleAskine;330453]Is the site currently down?[/QUOTE]

It seems up right now.

(btw, long time no see! :smile:)

Been switching my minions to P-1.... currently about [SIZE=3]¾ [/SIZE]are running P-1 at around ~10-12 I believe a day. 'need to catch up to that "Chris Halsall" guy there :bump2:

The ranking on the reports is rather broken, e.g. [URL]http://en.gpu72.com/reports/workers/[/URL]:

[code]
87 ramgeis 999
Stocker33 914

115 Anonymous 46
Anonymous 31

128 mdettweiler 4
Jack Sandor 3
[/code]Those shouldn't share a rank.

Also on [URL]http://en.gpu72.com/reports/workers/ll/[/URL]

[code]
10 Chuck 4,249
11 Sid & Andy 3,303
15 Carsten Kossendey 3,158
12 Pete 2,936
13 markr 2,691
14 delta_t 1,849
[/code]Where does the #15 part come from?

There's probably more, those just caught my eye.

Those ranks were always broken (i.e. they were never right, that is why people don't really pay attention to the numbers anymore). If you sort by, say, assigned ghzd, you see what I mean. Even in the main sorting (by "done") I was on position 20, but my number still was 18, and in front of me was 19 and 20 (to what I complained in the past, long ago).

Upon further inspection, that GHzd total is way off, and the #15 ranking would be correct based on the actual GHzd total. My bad. :confused:

Is the server down? I can't get the page to load more than partially.