[QUOTE=chalsall;324811]Excellent!!! :smile:

It can be argued that LL P-1'ing is currently more important than LLing (as long as enough memory is available and S2 is done).

If only we had a GPU P-1 program.... :wink:[/QUOTE]

We have a GPU ECM program... maybe in the next months we'll have some extensions. :wink:

Luigi

[QUOTE=firejuggler;324812]I find strange that the TF proposed in manual assignement are in the 79M-80 M range while so much work has to be done before we reach these highs.[/QUOTE]

You're talking Primenet assignments. Those usually end up going to CPUs, which almost never finish them.

[QUOTE=ET_;324813]We have a GPU ECM program... maybe in the next months we'll have some extensions. :wink:[/QUOTE]

Let us pray... :smile:

[QUOTE=firejuggler;324812]I find strange that the TF proposed in manual assignement are in the 79M-80 M range while so much work has to be done before we reach these highs.[/QUOTE]

Wow! It's true! And only doing 71-72, to boot.

YupChalsall. My bad, shouldn't having post this here.just got an assig in the 78.8 from 69 to 70 bits. Those take about 11 minutes and a half with mfaktc 0.20.
Taking one of the GPU 2 72 assig from 71 to 73 bits take me 3 hours. that's 180 minutes.
so ...
69 to 70 11.5 minutes
70 to 71 23 minutes
71 to 72 46 minutes
72 to 73 92 minutes
73 to 74 184 minutes.
Sould I "push' those manual primenet assig to 74 bits or 73 (which would take approximatly the same amount of time)?

[QUOTE=firejuggler;324818]Sould I "push' those manual primenet assig to 74 bits or 73 (which would take approximatly the same amount of time)?[/QUOTE]

Your choice. If you take them further you'll get the credit on Primenet.

Primenet still has many (CPU) clients asking for TF work. It hands them out as requested much further above, but the "close work" (some might understand the term "wet work") is being left to GPU72....

cookie cutter, bleeding edge (work)?

[QUOTE=firejuggler;324822]cookie cutter, bleeding edge (work)?[/QUOTE]

The latter works better than the former.... :smile:

[QUOTE=chalsall;324824]The latter works better than the former.... :smile:[/QUOTE]

Anyone got cookies? I'm hungry!

On a more serious thought... imho I think 70 is enough on DC TF, I don't think it's worth it, you're only saving one "[SIZE=1]short[/SIZE]" test, but just my personal opinion....

[QUOTE=kracker;324833]... imho I think 70 is enough on DC TF, I don't think it's worth it, you're only saving one "[SIZE=1]short[/SIZE]" test, but just my personal opinion....[/QUOTE]

This is not a matter of opinion. This is a matter of fact.

The problem is we're not yet sure exactly where the evidence tells us the curves cross....

[QUOTE=chalsall;324838]This is not a matter of opinion. This is a matter of fact.

The problem is we're not yet sure exactly where the evidence tells us the curves cross....[/QUOTE]

I see. :smile: but over 70 I believe, is almost useless.

EDIT: Meh, stupid me, I just about said that in my prev. post