[QUOTE=davieddy;302603]If you left DC to the slower guys 'n' gals the range wouldn't
be so high and they would stand a chance.

Find a prime for Christ's sake

D[/QUOTE]

But DC is so far behind LL.

[QUOTE=petrw1;302624]But DC is so far behind LL.[/QUOTE]
Not far enough to tempt me.

[QUOTE=davieddy;302639]Not far enough to tempt me.[/QUOTE]

Gee... A pity... You'd make such a difference to the effort....

[QUOTE=chalsall;302641]Gee... A pity... You'd make such a difference to the effort....[/QUOTE]Sarcasm will get you anywhere!

[QUOTE=davieddy;302170]I rest my case.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=petrw1;302175][URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjoH6TiW_eY[/URL]

I think if you change the general topic from the opening of the tomb to the clearing exponents this could very well be a discussion between Chris and David.:boxer:[/QUOTE]
That is so near the mark.
Assuming Hitchens is me, I was an exact contempory with
his great mate Martin Amis at Exeter College Oxford.

David

[QUOTE=davieddy;302815]Enough of your mindless insolence already[/QUOTE]
To add more fuel to this fun filled fire :smile: (albeit in a more appropriate thread):

I just went and got myself ten manually assigned "vanilla" expos from PrimeNet.

[quote=PrimeNet][FONT=Courier New]PrimeNet Get Manual Assignment(s)[/FONT]

[FONT=Courier New]Test=0B..FC,55338301,72,1[/FONT]
[FONT=Courier New]Test=94..8D,55338863,72,1[/FONT]
[FONT=Courier New]Test=F5..28,55341821,72,1[/FONT]
[FONT=Courier New]Test=F9..DD,55342549,72,1[/FONT]
[FONT=Courier New]Test=03..13,55342961,72,1[/FONT]
[FONT=Courier New]Test=14..6A,55343023,72,1[/FONT]
[FONT=Courier New]Test=70..2B,55343063,72,1[/FONT]
[FONT=Courier New]Test=2E..14,55343261,72,1[/FONT]
[FONT=Courier New]Test=AE..10,55343507,72,1[/FONT]
[FONT=Courier New]Test=BA..78,55343521,72,1[/FONT]

[FONT=Courier New]Distribute the lines above to your computer's worktodo.txt files.[/FONT] [/quote]

All at 72 and all P-1'd :smile:

(PS Damn variable width fonts!!!)

Huh
 

How did we end up with 46M(forty-six) on the DC-TF report right after 35M(thirty-five).

[url]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/available/[/url]

[QUOTE=petrw1;302837]How did we end up with 46M(forty-six) on the DC-TF report right after 35M(thirty-five).

[url]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/available/[/url][/QUOTE]

[url]http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=302828#post302828[/url]

[URL]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/factor_percentage/[/URL] has the range column mislabeled for DCTF and is missing the 38M & 39M ranges.

[QUOTE=ckdo;302842][URL]http://www.gpu72.com/reports/factor_percentage/[/URL] has the range column mislabeled for DCTF and is missing the 38M & 39M ranges.[/QUOTE]

The range columns are not mislabeled (unless I'm being really blind), and it's missing the 38M and 39M ranges because we haven't done any work there (yet).

[QUOTE=chalsall;302860]The range columns are not mislabeled (unless I'm being really blind), and it's missing the 38M and 39M ranges because we haven't done any work there (yet).[/QUOTE]

From my possibly blind vantage point the column 'Range' is labelled '62M'