[QUOTE=davieddy;302053]Assuming you are TFing "virgin" exponents, this is precisely what I have been advocating for a couple of years.[/QUOTE]

We really need a "Sigh...." emoticon....

[QUOTE=chalsall;302055]We really need a "Sigh...." emoticon....[/QUOTE]
Indeed.
[QUOTE=davieddy;302053]
When it was at 53M, we judged (accurately it is now clear)
that the GPU capacity could manage 72 bits for 200 NEW
LL assignments per day[B], hence the name "GPUto72".[/B]
[/QUOTE]

I was thinking "that's what we were telling you...." ...

[QUOTE=Dubslow;302059]
I was thinking "that's what we were telling you...." ...[/QUOTE]
You are telling me, but not DOING it.

[QUOTE=davieddy;302064]You are telling me, but not DOING it.[/QUOTE]

Gee... To do what you want (only 200 a day to 72) we'd have to turn over 75% of our firepower away....

[QUOTE=chalsall;302066]Gee... To do what you want (only 200 a day to 72) we'd have to turn over 75% of our firepower away....[/QUOTE]
So why isn't every exponent >53M TFed to 72 at least?

Because you won't listen.

[QUOTE=davieddy;302068]So why isn't every exponent >53M TFed to 72 at least?[/QUOTE]

"The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." - Einstein

And, BTW, there are currently 52,977 candidates between 53M and 60M which we [B][I][U]HAVE[/U][/I][/B] taken to 72 or above, and released back to PrimeNet. This is in addition to the 39,179 LL candidates below 53M which we've processed.

[QUOTE=davieddy;302068]Because you won't listen.[/QUOTE]

Not to you. Nope.

C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!
Daveiddy, stick to being the community bard and give chalsall a break.

[QUOTE=chalsall;302066]Gee... To do what you want (only 200 a day to 72) we'd have to turn over 75% of our firepower away....[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=davieddy;302068]So why isn't every exponent >53M TFed to 72 at least?

Because you won't listen.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=chalsall;302092]there are currently 52,977 candidates between 53M and 60M which we [B][I][U]HAVE[/U][/I][/B] taken to 72 or above,

Not to you. Nope.[/QUOTE]

I rest my case.

[QUOTE=davieddy;302170]I rest my case.[/QUOTE]

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjoH6TiW_eY[/url]

I think if you change the general topic from the opening of the tomb to the clearing exponents this could very well be a discussion between Chris and David.:boxer:

[QUOTE=petrw1;302175][URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjoH6TiW_eY[/URL]

I think if you change the general topic from the opening of the tomb to the clearing exponents this could very well be a discussion between Chris and David.:boxer:[/QUOTE]:smile::smile:

[QUOTE=petrw1;302175]I think if you change the general topic from the opening of the tomb to ...[/QUOTE]
:cmd:
That discussion is about tombs, plural not singular.