![]() |
[QUOTE=kladner;282553]Fascinating! Thanks for sharing.[/QUOTE]
Tidy! Luigi |
[QUOTE=Xyzzy;282472]Would you be willing to make the columns of data sortable[/QUOTE]
Rather than sortable columns, how about different reports for each work type? :smile: Also, I've changed the query slightly for the [URL="http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/"]Workers' Progress[/URL] reports so that if someone works from, for example, 69 to 72 the intermediate steps are shown. As in, there's a +1 at 70, 71 and 72 rather than just at 72. This makes much more sense, and helps make obvious why Craig is still ahead of Xyzzy even though Xyzzy has a slightly higher number of completions to 72. |
[QUOTE=chalsall;282718]Rather than sortable columns, how about different reports for each work type? :smile:[/QUOTE]Good, but introduces a bug you may not have thought of:
The [url=http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/p-1/]P-1 report[/url] for example shows Chris Halsall at #22, with a link to the [url=http://www.gpu72.com/reports/workers/overall/graph/21-30/]"Overall Work Done by Workers ranked 21 to 30" graph[/url]. Problem is, you're ranked #22 for P-1 work, but not #22 overall, which is what the linked graph shows. |
[QUOTE=James Heinrich;282722]Good, but introduces a bug you may not have thought of:[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I had thought of that. And it will be fixed once I have work type specific graphs.... |
600 factors found!!!
Hey all.
As of right now, the [URL="http://www.gpu72.com/"]GPU to 72 Project[/URL] has found 600 factors. 208 P-1 tests saved. 1,082 LL/DC tests saved. 91,053 GHz Days (249 GHz [B]YEARS[/B]) saved. Thanks for all the cycles everyone!!! :smile: |
[QUOTE=chalsall;282931]Hey all.
As of right now, the [URL="http://www.gpu72.com/"]GPU to 72 Project[/URL] has found 600 factors. 208 P-1 tests saved. 1,082 LL/DC tests saved. 91,053 GHz Days (249 GHz [B]YEARS[/B]) saved. Thanks for all the cycles everyone!!! :smile:[/QUOTE] And may I add over 100 of those factors are from us P-one-ers. |
[QUOTE=petrw1;282936]And may I add over 100 of those factors are from us P-one-ers.[/QUOTE]
Indeed!!! 104 factors found by way of P-1 efforts, out of 2,155 runs. At first we were having to return candidates back to PrimeNet without P-1 work being completed because of lack of participation. Now the system can't even keep it's cache of 250 full! :smile: |
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=chalsall;282938]Indeed!!! 104 factors found by way of P-1 efforts, out of 2,155 runs.
At first we were having to return candidates back to PrimeNet without P-1 work being completed because of lack of participation. Now the system can't even keep it's cache of 250 full! :smile:[/QUOTE] Gee, I hate to drop in a lump of coal in your stocking so close to Christmas but I have decided to switch work types in 2012 (New Year --> New Goal). I will be doing GPU-DC work starting in the new year on at least 13 cores. By then I will have completed 600 GPU P-1s....let's hope there will be others to take over my share of P-1 (15 per day). |
[QUOTE=petrw1;282939]..... I will be doing GPU-DC work starting in the new year on at least 13 cores. By then I will have completed 600 GPU P-1s....let's hope there will be others to take over my share of P-1 (15 per day).[/QUOTE]
Quibble: Surely those 600 P-1's are CPU? Just asking.:smile: |
[QUOTE=kladner;282940]Quibble: Surely those 600 P-1's are CPU? Just asking.:smile:[/QUOTE]
Yes, I am GPU-less. 3 Quads and 1 PIV full time P-1 for almost 2 months |
[QUOTE=kladner;282940]Quibble: Surely those 600 P-1's are CPU? Just asking.:smile:[/QUOTE]I'm pretty sure by "GPU-P1" and "GPU-DC" [i]petrw1[/i] is referring to assignments from [url=http://www.gpu72.com]www.gpu72.com[/url] as opposed to actually doing the work on a GPU.
I'll pick up a small amount of the slack by adding 4 cores of a i7-3930K into the mix for P-1 (the other 2 cores are busy feeding the GTX570 for TF :smile:). |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 06:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.