[QUOTE=petrw1;297609]...[/QUOTE]
It's on his to do list to add a function that guesses roughly how many P-1 factors you should have found based on the total average; he's done the same for TF, but P-1 is different enough that it's not a simple matter of copying code.

[QUOTE=petrw1;297609][CODE]Work Type Rank Of Candidates Factors GHz Days
Assigned Completed Expected Found
P-1 9 49 600 [B][U]Soon[/U][/B] 28 1,622.498[/CODE][/QUOTE]

@petrw1: "This is curious?

Not terribly.

I haven't yet finished the code required to predict P-1 factors found.

It's much more complicated than predicting simple TFing.

But I am amused that someone finally noticed (or, perhaps, noticed and brought it forward).

[QUOTE=chalsall;297617]@petrw1: "This is curious?

Not terribly.

I haven't yet finished the code required to predict P-1 factors found.

It's much more complicated than predicting simple TFing.

But I am amused that someone finally noticed (or, perhaps, noticed and brought it forward).[/QUOTE]

Guess I thought that since I do not have any assignments I could not have an Expected.

[QUOTE=petrw1;297623]Guess I thought that since I do not have any assignments I could not have an Expected.[/QUOTE]It's not an expected completion date, it's how many factors you were expected to find, compared to the 28 you actually found.

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;297624]It's not an expected completion date, it's how many factors you were expected to find, compared to the 28 you actually found.[/QUOTE]

:doh!:

[QUOTE=chalsall;297617]
But I am amused that someone finally noticed.[/QUOTE]
I noticed days ago, but I figured it out and did not ask (I was almost to ask, however). :D

[QUOTE=chalsall;294183]Instead I've added a "FactTo desc" to the "order by" clause. Try now.... :smile:[/QUOTE]
I was able to get one at 74, but everything else it gives me is 72. I would like to get the 73's before the 72's. How do I get them?

[QUOTE=flashjh;297889]I was able to get one at 74, but everything else it gives me is 72. I would like to get the 73's before the 72's. How do I get them?[/QUOTE]

A few weeks ago I changed the query to just sort by Exponent.

To give people a bit more control, I've added the same type of Options on the P-1 assignment page as is on the LLTF and DCTF pages; "What Makes Sense", "Lowest TF", "Highest TF", "Lowest Exponent", "Highest Exponent" and "Oldest Exponent".

Currently "What Makes Sense" is simply "Lowest Exponent", but this may change from time to time as the situation warrents. The other options will always do what they say they do.

[QUOTE=chalsall;297922]"Oldest Exponent"[/QUOTE]What does this option mean? Is that the one that GPUto72 has owned for the longest, or..?

[QUOTE=James Heinrich;297928]What does this option mean? Is that the one that GPUto72 has owned for the longest, or..?[/QUOTE]

Yes. Oldest held by GPU72 (as a function of when the system was first ever assigned it).

[QUOTE=chalsall;297922]A few weeks ago I changed the query to just sort by Exponent.

To give people a bit more control, I've added the same type of Options on the P-1 assignment page as is on the LLTF and DCTF pages; "What Makes Sense", "Lowest TF", "Highest TF", "Lowest Exponent", "Highest Exponent" and "Oldest Exponent".

Currently "What Makes Sense" is simply "Lowest Exponent", but this may change from time to time as the situation warrents. The other options will always do what they say they do.[/QUOTE]
Awesome! Thanks.