![]() |
Is this still running, or is done? Or in fact it evolved into GPU-2-72 project?
|
[QUOTE=LaurV;279466]Is this still running, or is done? Or in fact it evolved into GPU-2-72 project?[/QUOTE]
I think the latter. |
[QUOTE=LaurV;279466]Is this still running, or is done? Or in fact it evolved into GPU-2-72 project?[/QUOTE]
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAdottB7UU8]Yep[/url] David |
In my case, it's become GPU to 72....but I still take special requests.
|
I thought this was a special request thread, which while certainly less necessary thanks to GPU to 72, still is open...
|
[QUOTE=Christenson;279529]In my case, it's become GPU to 72....but I still take special requests.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Dubslow;279541]I thought this was a special request thread, which while certainly less necessary thanks to GPU to 72, still is open...[/QUOTE] Same here, that is why I asked. If still open, I am available to take some special requests too. |
I have 5 more exponents that need more TF:
72000209 72000283 72000343 72000449 72000479 They have already been TF'ed to 2^70 (and P-1'ed). They should be taken to 2^73 or 2^74 before I feed them to CudaLucas. Any volunteers? Thanks. |
[QUOTE=Prime95;282365]I have 5 more exponents that need more TF:
72000209 72000283 72000343 72000449 72000479 They have already been TF'ed to 2^70 (and P-1'ed). They should be taken to 2^73 or 2^74 before I feed them to CudaLucas. Any volunteers? Thanks.[/QUOTE] I'll take one or two. |
Which ones? I'll take the last three.
Edit [code]Factor=N/A,72000343,70,74 Factor=N/A,72000449,70,74 Factor=N/A,72000479,70,74 [/code] I'm sure I've asked this before, but why do you test exponents that are so high? |
[QUOTE=Dubslow;282369]
I'm sure I've asked this before, but why do you test exponents that are so high?[/QUOTE] I would guess, optimal use of GPU? Since 68M to 77.9M require 4096K FFT wich is a nice power of 2... From the GPU LL testing FAQ: [QUOTE] cudaLucas Restrictions Exponents: 2<=Exponent< 151,150,000 Exponent< 39,800,00 -> 2MB FFT size Exponent< 79,600,00 -> 4MB FFT size Exponent<159,200,00 -> 8MB FFT size [/QUOTE] |
[QUOTE=Dubslow;282369]Which ones? I'll take the last three.
[/QUOTE] OK. I'll take the first two. 72000209 72000283 70-74. EDIT: Running. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 13:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.