Just upload them to filesmelt.com and provide links... that's what I do when I can't get attachments here to work.

Also... way to avoid the question :smile:

[QUOTE=Dubslow;278352]At least 8 threads... but good performance, so not a Bulldozer?[/QUOTE]
Hehe, and as it [URL="http://www.overclock.net/t/1141188/asus-crosshair-v-formula-board-may-have-hampered-bulldozer"]turns out[/URL], this was a very "[URL="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20111013232215_Ex_AMD_Engineer_Explains_Bulldozer_Fiasco.html"]smart[/URL]" move of AMD. They forced all Bolldozer-reviewers to use a mainboard that really sucked with Bulldozer. When using a board that not just runs Bulldozer, but really [B]supports[/B] it, performance returns to usable figures. Still not the the performance that would hold up to the CPU name and flatten everything.

[QUOTE=LaurV;278407]Definitely not. I have read bad things about AMD, right here on this forum :D
About the photos, I really tried, but the 240kB limitation of the forum pissed me off, I have to make them either low resolution or tough jpg compression, in either case you can't see nothing clear... I will try again tonight.[/QUOTE]

Hmm.... we still haven't found out. Can you please tell us?

After I've run CudaLucas and have some results, where do I post them?
Do I send it somewhere or what?

Send the results to Primenet Server using the Manual Testing pages (be sure to be logged in to get the credit for it).

To expand on what lycorn said, click the (+) next to Manual Testing and then select Results

Thank you :)

100M digits
 

CudaLucas is running pretty well for 55.xxx.xxx exponents.:cool:
But it does'nt work for 332.xxx.xxx
what can i do?

Hi ,f11ksx
[QUOTE=f11ksx;283514]
But it does'nt work for 332.xxx.xxx
what can i do?[/QUOTE]
This is memory size issue.
My GTX-550Ti(1G byte) is not enough M332220523.
Somebody who does it a try?

Hi msft

I have 1536 Mb with the gtx-580
Do you mean it is not enough, and there is no solutions? :cry:

[QUOTE=f11ksx;283566]
I have 1536 Mb with the gtx-580
Do you mean it is not enough, and there is no solutions? :cry:[/QUOTE]Correct.

For each exponent range, there is a minimum FFT size needed, and no way to reduce that requirement.

There are tables of FFT size vs. exponent range around here somewhere.