"Subproject" #10: 200k-300k to 110 digits
 

[B]Reservations:[/B] [code]
200-250k RobertS [B](done!)[/B]
250-300k RobertS[/code]

[QUOTE=bchaffin;258416]Edit (just missed the edit window): hmm, there are some mysterious gaps in my worker's logs, so maybe we were both adding factors at the same time... I picked up the downdriver at 219282.1969, but it dropped ~10 digits with 2^2 some time before that. [B]Anyway, another one down![/B][/QUOTE]
I've started to bring up all seqs in 195k-250k to 110 digits (I've announced it somewhere here in the forum). 219282 was one of the last in this range, because it was quite "intensive". I left it at i1945 (100digits) in the evening and it was done in the next morning, by me and you.
But anyway, another one down!
To avoid double work: I will continue with the seqs. 250k-300k, <110 digits. 195k-250k is done.

PS: There are only 4860 seqs below 110 digits below 1M (mean size:106.2).
Right now 50 to 70 seqs are passing the 110 digits limit [B]daily[/B]!

[QUOTE=RobertS;258504]PS: There are only 4860 seqs below 110 digits below 1M (mean size:106.2).
Right now 50 to 70 seqs are passing the 110 digits limit [B]daily[/B]![/QUOTE]

At that rate it'll be less than 3 months till everything's up to 110 - will we need another 110 digits subproject or do you want to do all the work?
10k-50k to 120 digits isn't looking far off now :smile:

[QUOTE=10metreh;258514]At that rate it'll be less than 3 months till everything's up to 110 - will we need another 110 digits subproject or do you want to do all the work?
10k-50k to 120 digits isn't looking far off now :smile:[/QUOTE]
It seems like that it won't take 3 month, due to the huge progress (now 4828 seqs. <110 digits, < 1M)
I have not planned to do all <110 <1M seqs. But I'm not sure, wether another 110 digits subproject is suitable or not. In most cases there are only few terms to do.
I would join 10k-50k to 120 digits, after I could get to run GNFS on my unix machine.

[QUOTE=RobertS;258504]I've started to bring up all seqs in 195k-250k to 110 digits (I've announced it somewhere here in the forum). [/quote]That was in the main reservation thread, but I didn't pay enough attention to think of putting in such a reservation.

Mods, do we need to do something like that or should we just start a "mega project" thread to reserve wide swaths of numbers for intensive work?[quote]219282 was one of the last in this range, because it was quite "intensive". I left it at i1945 (100digits) in the evening and it was done in the next morning, by me and you.[/quote]I guess we could mark that as a major milestone....[quote]But anyway, another one down!
To avoid double work: I will continue with the seqs. 250k-300k, <110 digits. 195k-250k is done.[/quote]A nice wide swath of work by anyone's standards....[quote]PS: There are only 4860 seqs below 110 digits below 1M (mean size:106.2).
Right now 50 to 70 seqs are passing the 110 digits limit [B]daily[/B] ![/QUOTE]Nice progress!

[QUOTE=RobertS;258523]I would join 10k-50k to 120 digits, after I could get to run GNFS on my unix machine.[/QUOTE]Do you not run it because you haven't needed it or because you can't get it running?

If it's the latter, we can help you get it running.....

[QUOTE=RobertS;258523]In most cases there are only few terms to do.[/QUOTE]

I guess this is because of Ben's workers that are factoring all the lowest composites. This has the side-effect of pushing sequences up towards 110.

[quote=schickel;258564]Mods, do we need to do something like that or should we just start a "mega project" thread to reserve wide swaths of numbers for intensive work?[/quote]

This thread definitely isn't needed (under its current title, at least) as 200k-250k is done already by RobertS and he is now continuing to 300k. As taking sequences to 110 digits clearly isn't what it used to be, I think we coordinate the remaining effort in the ranges and status thread. Then when Subproject #9 runs out of sequences we can start the 120 digits effort (10k-50k, or perhaps 10k-100k?) for Subproject #10.

[QUOTE=10metreh;258566]This thread definitely isn't needed (under its current title, at least) as 200k-250k is done already by RobertS and he is now continuing to 300k. [/QUOTE]Oh, come on; what fits the spirit of the forum better than an entire thread devoted to a project that is almost done (and by one person at that!)?

[QUOTE=schickel;258568]Oh, come on; what fits the spirit of the forum better than an entire thread devoted to a project that is almost done (and by one person at that!)?[/QUOTE]

An entire thread devoted to a project that has already been done by only one person, I think. :razz:

We could keep the thread, as long as we change the title...
Edit: done. :grin:

[QUOTE=10metreh;258566]I guess this is because of Ben's workers that are factoring all the lowest composites. This has the side-effect of pushing sequences up towards 110.[/QUOTE]

Ben is not the only one who run workers to factor all the lowest composites!
My worker have also pushed the limit of the Database - thousends composites the last weeks.
And we don`t know how much people run also DB-Helpers.
So this work is from different Persons. And all Project benefit on that.

250k-300k is almost done.
Will continue with 300k-350k

PS: 3601 sequences < 1M < 110 digits left, with a mean size of 107.05