[QUOTE=gd_barnes;313206][URL]http://www.noprimeleftbehind.net/crus/DonBlazysiswrong.htm[/URL]
[/QUOTE]
The page title says "Riesel conjecture page 2 remain". Google will not look kindly to that.

While you're at it, you may consider adding links to Matthew Watkins' page
[url]http://empslocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin/zeta/RHproofs.htm[/url]
on purported proofs/disproofs/etc. of the Riemann Hypothesis, and Gerhard Woeginger's page
[url]http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP.htm[/url]
on purported proofs/disproofs/etc. of the P = NP problem. I link to all three now.

[QUOTE=axn;313226]The page title says "Riesel conjecture page 2 remain". Google will not look kindly to that.[/QUOTE]

I pulled a Don Blazys there. Fixed. Now it is true and correct.

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;313229]I pulled a Don Blazys there. Fixed. Now it is true and correct.[/QUOTE]

[URL="http://www.google.ca/search?num=100&hl=en&newwindow=1&q=site+noprimeleftbehind+net+crus+intitle+Don&sa=X&ei=Li9oUNX_JIPfyQH_-YHYCw&ved=0CB0QpBc&biw=1454&bih=704"]Don Blazys'[/URL] this google search should work.

Quoting gd_barnes:
[QUOTE]
The only way to slow down a crank is to publicly humilate him so much that he goes away.
[/QUOTE]

Actually, all cranks should simply be ignored.

But in my case, well, I must be such a clever, crafty and downright
dangerous crank, that the only way to "slow me down" is to start an
internet campaign to "publicly humiliate me so much that I go away".

Anyway, don't forget to tell everyone that I am "evil" and that I am
"out to get you" with my counting function!

Don.

You see folks, in this thread and elsewhere, I have offered to debate
the issue of my top ranked proof with any major college or university
mathematics department in the world.

The embarrassing fact is, they all chickened out, just like
[B][I]the little panty waist wussies that they are.[/I][/B]

Well, my offer to debate still stands.

All I ask is that we use our real names and that the debate be monitored
by the media and fairly moderated and refereed by a panel of experts.

So come on all you so called "famous" or "distinguished" mathematicians
like Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao.

Let's have at it!

You see folks, they really [B][I]can't[/I][/B] debate me, because it is obvious that I am right,
and that they would therefore lose such a debate.

Their problem is their fragile egos and haughty pride!

[B][I]They are simply too embarrassed to publicly admit that I am right.[/I][/B]

That's the truth.

Don.

[QUOTE=Don Blazys;313914]You see folks, they really [B][I]can't[/I][/B] debate me, because it is obvious that I ...[/QUOTE]... don't listen?
:lalalalala:

... ignore them?
:ignore:

:popcorn:

You just can't help it, can you.

Not only are you [B][I]continuing[/I][/B] to read this incredibly popular thread,
but you are [B][I]continuing[/I][/B] to post here too!

I think that's just great!

It tells everyone that you are utterly obsessed with me!

:missingteeth:

Don.

[QUOTE=Don Blazys;313919]You just can't help it, can you.[/QUOTE]Nope, I can't. You are 100% right there.[QUOTE=Don Blazys;313919]Not only are you [B][I]continuing[/I][/B] to read this incredibly popular thread,
but you are [B][I]continuing[/I][/B] to post here too![/QUOTE]Indeed. Although I thought that was obvious since how else could I have responded.[QUOTE=Don Blazys;313919]I think that's just great!

It tells everyone that you are utterly obsessed with me![/QUOTE]Not obsessed, but certainly enjoying your utter disregard for what the experts here are saying. Truly excellent trolling skillz.

[QUOTE=Don Blazys;313914]You see folks, in this thread and elsewhere, I have offered to debate
the issue of my top ranked proof with any major college or university
mathematics department in the world.

The embarrassing fact is, they all chickened out, just like
[B][I]the little panty waist wussies that they are.[/I][/B]

Well, my offer to debate still stands.

All I ask is that we use our real names and that the debate be monitored
by the media and fairly moderated and refereed by a panel of experts.

So come on all you so called "famous" or "distinguished" mathematicians
like Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao.

Let's have at it!

You see folks, they really [B][I]can't[/I][/B] debate me, because it is obvious that I am right,
and that they would therefore lose such a debate.

Their problem is their fragile egos and haughty pride!

[B][I]They are simply too embarrassed to publicly admit that I am right.[/I][/B]

That's the truth.

Don.[/QUOTE]

[URL="http://www.google.ca/search?num=100&hl=en&newwindow=1&site=&source=hp&q=site%3Anoprimeleftbehind.net+%2B%22Don%22&oq=site%3Anoprimeleftbehind.net+%2B%22Don%22&gs_l=hp.3...25354.38703.0.39078.35.34.1.0.0.0.150.2969.27j7.34.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.tdLQxtlQglQ"]This[/URL] must prove you're wrong, after all it's at the top of the search.

I and others have already proved that you are wrong. Some of them PhDs in math. You just won't accept it the fact that you are wrong. Why would a math department waste their time when they can easily see the flaws?

AFAIAC, you are a troll.